Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Saturday football

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Coffee
Posts: 2551
Old WHO Number: 211839
Been liked: 1 time

Saturday football

Post Coffee »

SOUTHAMPTON vs MANCHESTER UNITED (1230)
It’s been a tough, if expected, return to the Premier League for the Saints whose points tally is yet to get off the mark. Things ain’t so rosy for Man U either and a home win would see Southampton climb above their visitors in the table. Dear oh dear. Away win.

BRIGHTON & HOVE ALBION vs IPSWICH TOWN (1500)
From appalling starts to an outstanding one, at least as far as the Seagulls go. Ipswich have been served some tricky fixtures to start with, and Brighton will be no less of an opponent. Just one likely outcome here. Home win.

CRYSTAL PALACE vs LEICESTER CITY (1500)
Despite just the single point on the board, Palace look strong and should be way too good for the visiting Foxes. Home win.

FULHAM vs WEST HAM UNITED (1500)
A lot of people will understandably have this down as a draw, but with a hat full of fixtures now in the bag our new signings should have started to settle and form a decent functional first team. Fulham too have a decent side, so this is likely to be close. But with a strong defence – Wan-Bissaka, Todibo, Kilman – and Bowen, Paqueta and Kudus marauding towards the other end, there’s something about West Ham that threatens as few Irons sides have done in recent times. It will be interesting to see if Carlos Soler plays and what he can produce. Away win.
Image

LIVERPOOL vs NOTTINGHAM FOREST (1500)

Every point is valuable for Forest and they’ll be satisfied with the five they’ve notched up so far. They’ll struggle to add to that this afternoon, though, as Liverpool have their eyes firmly on top slot. Home win.

MANCHESTER CITY vs BRENTFORD (1500)
Will City’s legal troubles affect their approach to this game? Tempting to think it might, but unlikely. The Bees have started well but this encounter will be a bridge too far. Home win.

ASTON VILLA vs EVERTON (1730)
Poor old Everton. Bottom of the table (again), without a point and a sword once again dangling over their heads. Another tough season beckons.

BOURNEMOUTH vs CHELSEA (2000)
Two sides on the up. You’d have to fancy Chelsea, but cannot dismiss a strong Cherries side. The fence? Not today. Away win. 


*SUNDAY*

TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR vs ARSENAL (1400)
How much will the Arse miss Rice and Odegard? A good deal, you’d expect. And with home advantage, what more could Spurs wish for? But Arsenal are more than Rice and Odegard – just ask their accountants – and a local derby could spring any result, particularly if the hosts dominate midfield. So Draw it is.

WOLVERHAMPTON WANDERERS vs NEWCASTLE UNITED (1630)
It’s been a tough start for Wolves with one point and a goal difference of minus six after three games, while the Barcodes are unbeaten in fifth. Still, the hosts should be better than that and will hope to turn around their fortunes soonish. Can’t see it happening today though. Away win. 


OVER TO YOU…

SOU vs MNU
BHA vs IPS
CRY vs LEI
FUL vs WHU
LIV vs FOR
MCY vs BRF
AVL vs EVE
BOU vs CHE 

TOT vs ARS
WOL vs NEW
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3354
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Massive Attack »

£65M for Sowanke. Bargain! 😆
F 129 Row66
Posts: 440
Has liked: 231 times
Been liked: 256 times

Re: Saturday football

Post F 129 Row66 »

Love seeing the four-be-twos lose, even though I live within a mile of tottenham's ground, and am thus surrounded by gooners fans
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Mad Ferret »

Can’t say I’m happy to see Arsenal win. They will go close to the title again, hope they just miss out again.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Come On You Irons »

Far too many West Ham fans are obsessed with Tottenham 'hating'.

I can't stand Tottenham or Arsenal, so always want games between them to end in a draw. Just like Tottenham v Chelsea and Arsenal v Chelsea games.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2675
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Fauxstralian »

Think Solanke is a decent player (you’d hope so for £65m) but looked rusty. He is no Harry Kane though 
Everyone goes on about Romero & Van der Venn but they still can’t defend a set piece to save their lives.
Dont look any better than last season & Arsenal challenging for the league doesn’t do the manager any favours when they aren’t 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Manuel »

Must admit love seeing them lose at home and we don't really want a Man City procession. Spurs have some ordinary players, Brennan Johnson ain't the answer and not convinced Solanke will be a success for them.

The Aussie will be under pressure soon enough, seem to remember at the last season he was angrily suggesting it was nowhere near good enough and that there were going to be big changes in the summer with players and overall club mentality etc, lol.

Cunts.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2675
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Fauxstralian »

No lover of Arsenal but happier to see Tottenham lose. Utter cunts
If they lose here to an Arsenal team without Rice & Odegaard I suspect more than a few Tottenham fans will start to lose confidence in Fat Ange.
More abysmal work defending a set piece & the keeper looks a liability under any physical pressure. Bit of an Italian coward
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Hammer and Pickle »

One up now :)
lowlife
Posts: 972
Old WHO Number: 213354
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 150 times

Re: Saturday football

Post lowlife »

Watching Tottenham Arsenal and I don’t think there’s ever been a team that I’ve wanted to lose so much as Arsenal. Even thought it’s against Tottenham. The most snidey whingey team you can imagine with the biggest twat of a manager you could imagine.
User avatar
Full Rug
Posts: 118
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 25 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Full Rug »

It's all good and well saying we should have signed Duran, but the big question mark with him is, can he stick a long throw into the mixer?
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Manuel »

The old saying that you have to take your chances when on top must be the truest thing ever in football. There are no excuses, look at the size of a goal, it's pretty fucking big.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2675
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Fauxstralian »

Didn’t watch the game but read that Bournemouth missed a pen, hit the woodwork twice & tormented the Chelsea defence before a smash & grab at the end.
 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Manuel »

Probably just trying to make myself feel better but Jasnik may well be right and they were never selling Duran anyway, the Villa director was saying last week they'd had about 40 offers for him but they wanted to keep him. However, if he was gettable for just a few extra mil then that is a harsh reality that we will have to live with and it may have even have created problems behind the scenes, as we'd be a different animal with him leading our line.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Saturday football

Post stubbo-admin »

This was the video I was referring to:

Jasnik
Posts: 350
Old WHO Number: 10048
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: Saturday football

Post Jasnik »

Think the big problem here was they were not going to sell him.
They rejected every offer they got think they mentioned 34.

I wish sometimes we had done the same... 
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Saturday football

Post happygilmore »

A bid of 34m would have got it done apparently
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Saturday football

Post stubbo-admin »

frank_booth wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 21:57
stubbo-admin wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 21:12
onsideman wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 19:42 I'd definitely have forgone the 19 year old Brazilian kid who, yet again, was nowhere near the matchday squad.

The ineptitude is astounding. The player was desparate to join and we desperately needed him. Not hard
Not just that, but the 'suggestion' is we had a deal wrapped up for about 33m pre July, when Villa needed to sell, Tim swanned off to Brazil chasing 'young talent' rather than close it and by the time he came back they'd flogged Luiz and Kellyman, sorted their books and the Duran price had gone up.

Sullivan then says he's not paying more than the previously agreed price, and cue the saga of trying to get them to take less than 40m in a variety of ways.

Only at West Ham.
How reliable is this story? I thought it was they wanted 40 and we offered 25? Or there was a 15 mil discrepancy. If this is the case, that’s fucking shocking.
Well Nick at Claret and Booze was calling the Duran story from long before it broke as said he knew someone genuinely close to the deal. Openly admits he's rarely 'in the know' but said on the Duran deal he had a solid source right in the middle of it (on the Duran side of the deal) and stuck to it throughout. 

Only you can decide if he's shitting on it or not, but he rarely claims to truly 'know' but on this one he stuck to his guns and said he had a source and he did know what was happening.
frank_booth
Posts: 83
Old WHO Number: 225300
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Saturday football

Post frank_booth »

stubbo-admin wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 21:12
onsideman wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 19:42 I'd definitely have forgone the 19 year old Brazilian kid who, yet again, was nowhere near the matchday squad.

The ineptitude is astounding. The player was desparate to join and we desperately needed him. Not hard
Not just that, but the 'suggestion' is we had a deal wrapped up for about 33m pre July, when Villa needed to sell, Tim swanned off to Brazil chasing 'young talent' rather than close it and by the time he came back they'd flogged Luiz and Kellyman, sorted their books and the Duran price had gone up.

Sullivan then says he's not paying more than the previously agreed price, and cue the saga of trying to get them to take less than 40m in a variety of ways.

Only at West Ham.
How reliable is this story? I thought it was they wanted 40 and we offered 25? Or there was a 15 mil discrepancy. If this is the case, that’s fucking shocking.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Saturday football

Post stubbo-admin »

onsideman wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 19:42 I'd definitely have forgone the 19 year old Brazilian kid who, yet again, was nowhere near the matchday squad.

The ineptitude is astounding. The player was desparate to join and we desperately needed him. Not hard
Not just that, but the 'suggestion' is we had a deal wrapped up for about 33m pre July, when Villa needed to sell, Tim swanned off to Brazil chasing 'young talent' rather than close it and by the time he came back they'd flogged Luiz and Kellyman, sorted their books and the Duran price had gone up.

Sullivan then says he's not paying more than the previously agreed price, and cue the saga of trying to get them to take less than 40m in a variety of ways.

Only at West Ham.
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Saturday football

Post onsideman »

I'd definitely have forgone the 19 year old Brazilian kid who, yet again, was nowhere near the matchday squad.

The ineptitude is astounding. The player was desparate to join and we desperately needed him. Not hard
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Saturday football

Post happygilmore »

amazing that we could all see that but the football professionals couldn't.

It isn't only the stunner he's just scored, its him getting the winner in 3 out of 4 games this season as a late sub

I 20 year old with massive potential or a journeyman 32 yr old German. It was a no brainer. I'd have forgone w]one of the midfield signings to make up the asking price
 
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Saturday football

Post onsideman »

happygilmore wrote: 14 Sep 2024, 19:12 Villa 3-2 now
we should have gone all out for Duran
amazing that we could all see that but the football professionals couldn't.

It isn't only the stunner he's just scored, its him getting the winner in 3 out of 4 games this season as a late sub
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Saturday football

Post happygilmore »

Villa 3-2 now
we should have gone all out for Duran
User avatar
mallard
Posts: 817
Old WHO Number: 14461
Has liked: 219 times
Been liked: 89 times

Re: Saturday football

Post mallard »

Everton 2 up at Villa Park

Let’s see if we get another implosion in injury time!
lowlife
Posts: 972
Old WHO Number: 213354
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 150 times

Re: Saturday football

Post lowlife »

Everton 2 up despite only having 14% of the ball. Dyche is out Moyes-ing Moyes.
Post Reply