AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Sullivan
-
- Posts: 1117
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1102 times
- Been liked: 267 times
Sullivan
Wouldn't be surprised when the seedy little perverted dwarf leaves, there will be a scandal about him going on. Women will come out and accuse him of misconduct, sexual harassment etc.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Sullivan
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑17 Nov 2024, 13:52 Minority groups?
To be honest Sullivan has gone above & beyond by marrying a 6ft TRANNY
Who cares about his personal life and who he has married. The fuck business is it of yours? I suppose me saying that makes me a ''moaner''. You're just fucking weird with your never ending personal agendas of people.
Re: Sullivan
On another thread there is a post referring to how two erstwhile favourites performed against the likes of Port Vale and Notts County a generation or more ago.
It helps put into perspective the merits, or otherwise, of the Sullivan era.
It helps put into perspective the merits, or otherwise, of the Sullivan era.
-
- Posts: 2675
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Sullivan
Minority groups?
To be honest Sullivan has gone above & beyond by marrying a 6ft TRANNY
Sullivan is the problem as he picks the managers with no football intelligence
Obvious when you see smaller clubs like Brentford, Bournemouth, Brighton & Fulham etc with progressive younger managers who are superior to our dinosaurs like Loppy, Moyes. Allardyce & Avram Grant
To be honest Sullivan has gone above & beyond by marrying a 6ft TRANNY
Sullivan is the problem as he picks the managers with no football intelligence
Obvious when you see smaller clubs like Brentford, Bournemouth, Brighton & Fulham etc with progressive younger managers who are superior to our dinosaurs like Loppy, Moyes. Allardyce & Avram Grant
Re: Sullivan
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2024, 18:45Then you son, are a major part of the problem in my honest opinion.
under this regime we have become a solid premiership club!
-
- Posts: 240
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 26 times
Re: Sullivan
Agreed GB - despise all 3 of them.
Problem is, the cartel has now fixed it to stop wealthy owners coming in to buy success and challenge them (just like they did).
So there’s little incentive for people to buy clubs these days.
Problem is, the cartel has now fixed it to stop wealthy owners coming in to buy success and challenge them (just like they did).
So there’s little incentive for people to buy clubs these days.
-
- Posts: 240
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 26 times
Re: Sullivan
The hatred for him and Brady should be made far clearer to have even the slightest effect on them, maybe force Kretinsky into moving. Won’t happen with our diluted support now, just apathy.
Gold, Sullivan and Brady have never done anything for the betterment of our club only themselves albeit Gold had a little sentiment, but all still outright self serving liars with no concern for anything the support want until it turns toxic.
Personally would wish stage 4 arse rot on the remaining 2 cunts.
Gold, Sullivan and Brady have never done anything for the betterment of our club only themselves albeit Gold had a little sentiment, but all still outright self serving liars with no concern for anything the support want until it turns toxic.
Personally would wish stage 4 arse rot on the remaining 2 cunts.
-
- Posts: 178
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 271 times
- Been liked: 61 times
Re: Sullivan
As the late great Peter Cook would've said..
A liar, a humbug, a hypocrite, a vagabond, a loathsome spotted reptile and a self-confessed chicken strangler. You may choose, if you wish, to believe the transparent tissue of odious lies which streamed on and on from his disgusting, greedy, slavering lips.
A liar, a humbug, a hypocrite, a vagabond, a loathsome spotted reptile and a self-confessed chicken strangler. You may choose, if you wish, to believe the transparent tissue of odious lies which streamed on and on from his disgusting, greedy, slavering lips.
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Sullivan
Sullivan has consistently demonstrated he carries weight on the board beyond his minority share - why? I’m not going to speculate but I would suggest trying to freeze him out is a high-risk strategy liable to lead to a stalemate just when we need decisive action. He needs to believe he’s a great visionary ready to act decisively and be given the credit for doing so. After all, if all he wants is an ego massage, Sullivan can have it if he agrees to spend and get rid for someone like Potter or the German Slav.
Re: Sullivan
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑09 Nov 2024, 21:22 Wouldn't be surprised when the seedy little perverted dwarf leaves, there will be a scandal about him going on. Women will come out and accuse him of misconduct, sexual harassment etc.
I’m going to celebrate when he croaks it. One down, two to go.
- factory seconds
- Posts: 164
- Old WHO Number: 294848
- Been liked: 64 times
Re: Sullivan
sullivan acts with a certainty that the gold family shares will always vote en bloc with him, which seems odd to me. have it on good authority that outside of business they weren't exactly mates so i can't imagine his daughter or her ST holding husband have any reason to swear fealty unless there's something legal written into them
if i were kretinsky i'd be making a concerted effort to WOO them in order to kneecap the dwarf after his fuckup in pushing an unsuitable manager no-one wanted.
if i were kretinsky i'd be making a concerted effort to WOO them in order to kneecap the dwarf after his fuckup in pushing an unsuitable manager no-one wanted.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: Sullivan
I think he'd probably already made up his mind that he was going after Chelsea long before we got relegated. We were relegated in May 2003, and he completed his takeover of Chelsea in June - just a month later. These things take months to negotiate, so he'd have made up his mind long beforehand. We were already struggling, of course, so maybe that played a part. Who knows? He probably weighed up a few clubs. The same team that told me he sniffed around us also said his advisers looked briefly at Q.P.R and Fulham. Imagine that lot becoming a global force?!
Sounds like Abramovic just wanted a big London club. But Chelsea seemed to be his first choice.
Sounds like Abramovic just wanted a big London club. But Chelsea seemed to be his first choice.
Re: Sullivan
If Roedent hadn't relegated us it might of happened. No way was he buying a Championship club.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: Sullivan
Speaking of ownership, the other thing I picked up last summer was that, allegedly, Abramovic briefly looked at West Ham before he bought Chelsea.
Again, no idea how serious it was - others have said Chelsea was always his target. But, if true, there was a sliding doors moment. That would have been a rollercoaster.
Again, no idea how serious it was - others have said Chelsea was always his target. But, if true, there was a sliding doors moment. That would have been a rollercoaster.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: Sullivan
Yeah, Sullivan owns 38.8% of shares in the club. Making him the biggest shareholder, rather than the outright owner.
Kretinsky and his business partner, Pavel Horsky, own 27% between them.
The Gold family own 25.1% via what is now a trust.
That weird Yank, Tripp Smith, owns around 8%.
Other investors own 1.1%.
Basically, our ownership structure is more complex than most. Making a takeover a little more difficult, but not impossible. If you nabbed Kretinsky's and the Gold family shares, you'd probably have effective control of the club.
Some legal insiders told me a while back that the Saudi's sniffed around West Ham before buying Newcastle. Prestige and landmarks are always a big thing with them, and they liked the idea of owning a London-based side playing in the "Olympic" stadium. But it never got off the ground - not sure how far it got, tbh.
Kretinsky and his business partner, Pavel Horsky, own 27% between them.
The Gold family own 25.1% via what is now a trust.
That weird Yank, Tripp Smith, owns around 8%.
Other investors own 1.1%.
Basically, our ownership structure is more complex than most. Making a takeover a little more difficult, but not impossible. If you nabbed Kretinsky's and the Gold family shares, you'd probably have effective control of the club.
Some legal insiders told me a while back that the Saudi's sniffed around West Ham before buying Newcastle. Prestige and landmarks are always a big thing with them, and they liked the idea of owning a London-based side playing in the "Olympic" stadium. But it never got off the ground - not sure how far it got, tbh.
Re: Sullivan
Gank
Sullivan only owns about 39% iirc. So he isn't the owner, just the biggest shareholder.
Sullivan can be outvoted but it needs most of the board to go against him now that he cannot rely on the Gold family since David Gold's death.
As an example, I heard from a friend of a friend with supposed boardroom connections, that Sullivan had to agree to take a backward step for the appointment of Steidten. It was supposedly done on the basis that Sullivan had done a great job but, the club needed to be less reliant on him now that he was 75.
Sullivan only owns about 39% iirc. So he isn't the owner, just the biggest shareholder.
Sullivan can be outvoted but it needs most of the board to go against him now that he cannot rely on the Gold family since David Gold's death.
As an example, I heard from a friend of a friend with supposed boardroom connections, that Sullivan had to agree to take a backward step for the appointment of Steidten. It was supposedly done on the basis that Sullivan had done a great job but, the club needed to be less reliant on him now that he was 75.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 956
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 442 times
Re: Sullivan
...and aim not saying he wants to be the good guy. But he wants to be SEEN to be the good guy. It's part of his clear insecurity complex.
That's the thing to play on to get rid of him.
That's the thing to play on to get rid of him.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 956
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 442 times
Re: Sullivan
Sullivan despises bad publicity.
Everything he does is centred around his optics (or money). I suspect if the fans and his media chums started to ask the difficult questions, he'd find a reason to want out.
Alledged investigations like the one Wils posted below, if it comes to fruition, could well do the trick too.
If the club was up for sale at a reasonable price, there would be no shortage of interested parties.
Everything he does is centred around his optics (or money). I suspect if the fans and his media chums started to ask the difficult questions, he'd find a reason to want out.
Alledged investigations like the one Wils posted below, if it comes to fruition, could well do the trick too.
If the club was up for sale at a reasonable price, there would be no shortage of interested parties.
Re: Sullivan
Folk such as Sullivan tend to have developed a REALLY thick skin over years of wrangling deals in very hostile environments. Chants and even coins thrown will barely register. People I have known similar to this only really take notice when the income stream from their business dries up.
They are well aware that supporters of football clubs, however vocal and fierce their anger will keep sending them their money until hell freezes over.
They are well aware that supporters of football clubs, however vocal and fierce their anger will keep sending them their money until hell freezes over.
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1138
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 372 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Re: Sullivan
Gank wrote: ↑10 Nov 2024, 15:39Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑10 Nov 2024, 15:00 Good luck getting any anti-Sillivan chants going at the ground in this day and age.Agreed
Also, he’s the owner, even if you managed to make it such an uncomfortable place to be on match days, that’s not his day job and he’ll simply stop going to matches. He’ll still own the club.
You could kill him, or have him killed, but then you get the spastic son take over so it really needs to be a sale and you can’t force someone to do that, he needs an amazing offer.
if you can’t offer that, stop wasting your time.
You are right of course, but that doesn't mean the fans should sit silently. Voicing negatives towards Sullivan will over time be a pain in his ego
Re: Sullivan
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑10 Nov 2024, 15:00 Good luck getting any anti-Sillivan chants going at the ground in this day and age.
Agreed
Also, he’s the owner, even if you managed to make it such an uncomfortable place to be on match days, that’s not his day job and he’ll simply stop going to matches. He’ll still own the club.
You could kill him, or have him killed, but then you get the spastic son take over so it really needs to be a sale and you can’t force someone to do that, he needs an amazing offer.
if you can’t offer that, stop wasting your time.
Also, he’s the owner, even if you managed to make it such an uncomfortable place to be on match days, that’s not his day job and he’ll simply stop going to matches. He’ll still own the club.
You could kill him, or have him killed, but then you get the spastic son take over so it really needs to be a sale and you can’t force someone to do that, he needs an amazing offer.
if you can’t offer that, stop wasting your time.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Sullivan
stubbo-admin wrote: ↑10 Nov 2024, 14:42 I wouldn't be surprised either. Just one of the reasons there should be (IMO) a sustained campaign to rid ourselves of this little stain on our club.
Driving him to sell up is the best thing that can happen for our club.
As for making him fuck off...answers on a post card.
Couldn't agree more. Some have tried throwing coins at him but he never got the message.
We should be making noise letting him know at every game. Perhaps like that legendary semi final where the fans kept up "Billy bond's claret and blue army" we should have an anti-Sullivan chant sung with the same intensity at every game until he goes.
We should be making noise letting him know at every game. Perhaps like that legendary semi final where the fans kept up "Billy bond's claret and blue army" we should have an anti-Sullivan chant sung with the same intensity at every game until he goes.