AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Epstein latest disclosures
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Epstein latest disclosures
Some fairly unpleasant undertones for both Trump and Mandelson in the latest presentation of Epstein information.
Hard not to overly the quoted materials that are in relation to 'birthday notes' from these guys with the trafficking he has been proven to be a part of.
Jeffrey Epstein files and 'birthday book': What we know - BBC News
Mandelson's office saying 'he's said he wishes he never made the connection' is hardly an appropriate response...although the messages being cryptic means they probably count it as enough.
Will it ever all come out? Doubtful...but it's pretty clear that this whole Epstein affair laid bare would have been a disaster for so many public figures, that his convenient death was the best they could do.
What say the sages of WHO?
Hard not to overly the quoted materials that are in relation to 'birthday notes' from these guys with the trafficking he has been proven to be a part of.
Jeffrey Epstein files and 'birthday book': What we know - BBC News
Mandelson's office saying 'he's said he wishes he never made the connection' is hardly an appropriate response...although the messages being cryptic means they probably count it as enough.
Will it ever all come out? Doubtful...but it's pretty clear that this whole Epstein affair laid bare would have been a disaster for so many public figures, that his convenient death was the best they could do.
What say the sages of WHO?
-
- Posts: 910
- Been liked: 219 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
XKhammer wrote: ↑21 Sep 2025, 01:24THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 07:58Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of themPossible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.
If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.Ohhhh the flat earthers are here ohhhh the freaks and bible bashing morons ohhh
You're R-A-P-E-Y,
You're R-A-P-E-Y,
You know you NONCE, we're sure you NONCE,
You're R-A-P-E-Y.
You're R-A-P-E-Y,
You know you NONCE, we're sure you NONCE,
You're R-A-P-E-Y.
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 07:58Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of themPossible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.
If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.
Ohhhh the flat earthers are here ohhhh the freaks and bible bashing morons ohhh
-
- Posts: 910
- Been liked: 219 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them
Possible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.
If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.
If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.
-
- Posts: 2253
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 505 times
- Been liked: 760 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
MA.
Have to agree there. The Dems went to enough trouble inventing charges to try to stop/jail/bankrupt Trump. Surely if they had evidence that could ruin him they'd have got it into the public domain by now.
Have to agree there. The Dems went to enough trouble inventing charges to try to stop/jail/bankrupt Trump. Surely if they had evidence that could ruin him they'd have got it into the public domain by now.
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them
I had thought for a while now that Trump isn't trying to protect himself, it's others who he likes he's trying to protect as much as he can. Could even be a surprise like Bill Clinton because Trump loves his Country and might not like the idea of him being officially outed embarrassing a Former President like that, if it can be at all helped. Or someone like that has been my hunch. He doesn't look fazed at all if it was just to protect himself, he always looks totally relaxed about it being him.
It's things like the previous Democrat administrations that have had the opportunity to fuck Trump over good and proper if they had discovered real dirt on Trump involving the Epstein Files but never did. That's a big indicator for me. Could even be Hollywood stars like say a Clint Eastwood or the like he'd want to protect.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
I wonder how many votes of no confidence letters have gone in already on the quiet... 🗳
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1550
- Has liked: 380 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
It's the political equivalent of the football manager's kiss of death.
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Luckily he only has Badenoch on the other side
Very low ebb for both parties
Very low ebb for both parties
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
It's the fact he publicly backs him in PMQs yesterday and then sacks the twat the next morning, on top of everything else falling apart around him since the return back from their school break.
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Not sure many in the Labour Party were happy at Mandelson being in a senior role so not sure many tears will be shed
Mandelson seemed popular with Trump
Maybe reminiscing over their good times in the old days on Epstein Island
Mandelson seemed popular with Trump
Maybe reminiscing over their good times in the old days on Epstein Island
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
I think he's done, too. I think this'll escalate rapidly into a Labour feeding frenzy which I think will be amusing to see. 
It's becoming untenable.
It's becoming untenable.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 499
- Has liked: 301 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Fuck me. Starmer backs Mandy yesterday then sacks him today. When even Bad Enoch is making mince meat of him, he's really is on the rocks.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 10:55 Mandelson sacked
Maybe we will see others with inappropriate connections to the paedo similarly sacked
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
A hattrick of sackings for him.
I wonder what this "new information" that came to light, was all about?
I wonder what this "new information" that came to light, was all about?
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Mandelson sacked
Maybe we will see others with inappropriate connections to the paedo similarly sacked
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
Maybe we will see others with inappropriate connections to the paedo similarly sacked
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Starmer is floundering badly
With Starmer Sunak Truss Johnson & Cameron we have had the 5 worst PM’s since Thatcher. In a row!
Badenoch Farage & Lammy are the leaders next in line aren’t they so not getting any better
With Starmer Sunak Truss Johnson & Cameron we have had the 5 worst PM’s since Thatcher. In a row!
Badenoch Farage & Lammy are the leaders next in line aren’t they so not getting any better
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Mandelson is on his way out
Position is untenable
Needs to be asked whether Epstein provided him with underage boys
Position is untenable
Needs to be asked whether Epstein provided him with underage boys
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 13:06 Was reading that this Trump note was in a 238 page scrapbook that Ghislaine Maxwell put together for Epstein’s 50th
Maxwell obviously thinks there is a pardon coming once Trump can push this hoax line a bit further
Not sure what her explanation for a Donald Trump note not by Donald Trump in the scrapbook is but am sure they are working on it
Have abandoned the ‘Trump was working for the FBI to keep an eye on Epstein’ story though
Problem is nobody knows what to believe after all the crying wolf of the last 4 years. It’s all been engineered and fallen Flat so the reasoned assumption is that this is just another gotcha that’s going nowhere.
-
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Was reading that this Trump note was in a 238 page scrapbook that Ghislaine Maxwell put together for Epstein’s 50th
Maxwell obviously thinks there is a pardon coming once Trump can push this hoax line a bit further
Not sure what her explanation for a Donald Trump note not by Donald Trump in the scrapbook is but am sure they are working on it
Have abandoned the ‘Trump was working for the FBI to keep an eye on Epstein’ story though
Maxwell obviously thinks there is a pardon coming once Trump can push this hoax line a bit further
Not sure what her explanation for a Donald Trump note not by Donald Trump in the scrapbook is but am sure they are working on it
Have abandoned the ‘Trump was working for the FBI to keep an eye on Epstein’ story though
-
- Posts: 562
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 200 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 10:21Council Scum" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:34 Ghislaine Maxwell has also stated that Prince Andrew was set up and didn't do anything wrong.
All you have to do these days is be photographed with a criminal/paedo/murderer, and you are as guilty as them on social media.
Hmmm
Lets have it right, that wasn't even needed, anyone who has worked in or around the BBC knows exactly what a sex pest he has been to women over the years.
As well as the odd dead hooker ALLEGEDLY
As well as the odd dead hooker ALLEGEDLY
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
Council Scum" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:34 Ghislaine Maxwell has also stated that Prince Andrew was set up and didn't do anything wrong.
All you have to do these days is be photographed with a criminal/paedo/murderer, and you are as guilty as them on social media.
Hmmm

-
- Posts: 136
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
The work of a time traveller is a more credible explanation.
Where can I get hold of a supply of your tin foil?
Where can I get hold of a supply of your tin foil?
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1092
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 578 times
- Been liked: 520 times
Re: Epstein latest disclosures
zebthecat wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:16Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 07:15 I would be more inclined to believe Trump wrote those birthday messages to Epstein had the messages been more neutral in tone. The 'we have a lot in common' comment and allusion to 'secrets' is too clumsy in my opinion. Sounds like a hoaxer trying just a bit too hard.If so said hoaxer was playing a very long game.
...or forged more recently?