AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1492
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 106 times
- Been liked: 336 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 15:19One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 14:57 A documentary film about Donald might be interesting, at least. He might be a scumbag sex case but there's never a dull moment with him. What does Meliana ever do other than stand next to the orange rapist with a permanent, slightly puzzled "don't I know you from somewhere?" look on her face?
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.
No sunshine, it is what it is. A documentary of a First Lady. That’s all, nothing more. Nothing to get yourself so worked up over you deranged Mong!
And yet you're on here like a one man PR team for it
-
Westham67
- Posts: 1325
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 440 times
- Been liked: 162 times
- Contact:
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
A distraction so the ICE issues dont make the headlines
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 14:57 A documentary film about Donald might be interesting, at least. He might be a scumbag sex case but there's never a dull moment with him. What does Meliana ever do other than stand next to the orange rapist with a permanent, slightly puzzled "don't I know you from somewhere?" look on her face?
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.
No sunshine, it is what it is. A documentary of a First Lady. That’s all, nothing more. Nothing to get yourself so worked up over you deranged Mong!
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 641
- Has liked: 381 times
- Been liked: 166 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
A documentary film about Donald might be interesting, at least. He might be a scumbag sex case but there's never a dull moment with him. What does Meliana ever do other than stand next to the orange rapist with a permanent, slightly puzzled "don't I know you from somewhere?" look on her face?
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 07:52 Luckily in America no convicted criminals are elected to public office
Not everything has to be linked to Trump.
We all already know you spend every waking moment furiously hate wanking over him.
We all already know you spend every waking moment furiously hate wanking over him.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It would have had someone not shone a light on it.
Right now I suspect his life is getting ripped to shreds looking for anything to bang him up.
Right now I suspect his life is getting ripped to shreds looking for anything to bang him up.
- goose
- Posts: 6433
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 586 times
- Been liked: 1126 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
No but you are a nonce. No surprise you’d stick up for your own.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4599
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 683 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Luckily in America no convicted criminals are elected to public office
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
No, but you are, by your own admission, a rapey nonce.
Glass houses, stones, pots, kettles etc...
Glass houses, stones, pots, kettles etc...
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
But thats it as its an accusation...not fact unlike the nonces and rapists in your beloved Vatican
oh by the way I'm clearly not a Trump supporter
oh by the way I'm clearly not a Trump supporter
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1330
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 334 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 21:08only1billybonds wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!No not spot on, some were discredited but there are more than that, some were never investigated and says as much in the files. As for them being deleted, feel free to try and find the below on the DoJ website, you can't, because they're already gone
They haven't deleted anything and the complainant was found not credible.
The files are suffering from the amount of traffic of desperate morons thinking that there is going to be something there that can be cause for impeachment or worse. It's not going to happen.
The files are suffering from the amount of traffic of desperate morons thinking that there is going to be something there that can be cause for impeachment or worse. It's not going to happen.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4599
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 683 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Believe this Melania film cost $75m including $35m on marketing & promotion
Financed by Jeff Bezos of Amazon who will benefit to much more than that despite the ticket sales being a car crash
The director has had multiple sexual assault allegations against him by actresses so I guess he will have something to chat to the President about at the premiere
Financed by Jeff Bezos of Amazon who will benefit to much more than that despite the ticket sales being a car crash
The director has had multiple sexual assault allegations against him by actresses so I guess he will have something to chat to the President about at the premiere
-
Hello Mrs. Jones
- Posts: 409
- Old WHO Number: 224273
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 78 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutloaf. I suppose this weekend you will be snuggled up with a large bucket of popcorn and a box of tissues watching Melania. She got $28m for this turkey, adding to the Trump grift.
One critic said, 'it was so bad that even passengers watching on a plane walked out'. Another 'I would rather have a glass shard enema that watch that again'.
One critic said, 'it was so bad that even passengers watching on a plane walked out'. Another 'I would rather have a glass shard enema that watch that again'.
- goose
- Posts: 6433
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 586 times
- Been liked: 1126 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It’s pretty hard to put a positive spin on that accusation.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 21:14Nutsin wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 21:06only1billybonds wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
- goose
- Posts: 6433
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 586 times
- Been liked: 1126 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 21:06only1billybonds wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.

-
Hammer I am
- Posts: 410
- Old WHO Number: 22726
- Has liked: 101 times
- Been liked: 104 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
only1billybonds wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
No not spot on, some were discredited but there are more than that, some were never investigated and says as much in the files. As for them being deleted, feel free to try and find the below on the DoJ website, you can't, because they're already gone
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
only1billybonds wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2679
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 668 times
- Been liked: 1043 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Do fuck off!
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1330
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 334 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
They haven't been deleted, and they have all been investigated and found to be false allegations.
Anyone who thinks the Democrats sat on the Epstein files for 4 years without checking to find prosecutable evidence against Trump is a moron. They were literally working with Epstein in Trump's first term and came up with nothing back then.
Anyone who thinks the Democrats sat on the Epstein files for 4 years without checking to find prosecutable evidence against Trump is a moron. They were literally working with Epstein in Trump's first term and came up with nothing back then.
-
Hammer I am
- Posts: 410
- Old WHO Number: 22726
- Has liked: 101 times
- Been liked: 104 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yep, they're all being deleted as we speak, good job thousands have already saved them
- goose
- Posts: 6433
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 586 times
- Been liked: 1126 times
- goose
- Posts: 6433
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 586 times
- Been liked: 1126 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Received On: 07/04/2016
Receipt Method: TelephoneIncident
Type: Criminal ActivityComplaint
Details:On 07/04/2016 at 2:16 EST, cellular telephone number office address ocate in home addresslocated in contacted the Public attorney to Jane Doe, to report the sexual exploitation and rape of a minor child of 13 years of age by Donald J Trump and Jeffrey E Epstein.
Receipt Method: TelephoneIncident
Type: Criminal ActivityComplaint
Details:On 07/04/2016 at 2:16 EST, cellular telephone number office address ocate in home addresslocated in contacted the Public attorney to Jane Doe, to report the sexual exploitation and rape of a minor child of 13 years of age by Donald J Trump and Jeffrey E Epstein.
