Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1492
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 336 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Nutsin
Posts: 3687
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 31 Jan 2026, 14:57 A documentary film about Donald might be interesting, at least. He might be a scumbag sex case but there's never a dull moment with him. What does Meliana ever do other than stand next to the orange rapist with a permanent, slightly puzzled "don't I know you from somewhere?" look on her face?
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.

 
No sunshine, it is what it is. A documentary of a First Lady. That’s all, nothing more. Nothing to get yourself so worked up over you deranged Mong!
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 641
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

A documentary film about Donald might be interesting, at least. He might be a scumbag sex case but there's never a dull moment with him. What does Meliana ever do other than stand next to the orange rapist with a permanent, slightly puzzled "don't I know you from somewhere?" look on her face?
Already looks like a massive flop - 6% on Rotten Tomatoes and tickets remain unsold for most UK showings.
Of course Nutsin will put his tin foil hat on and argue its the best, sell out film of all time and the facts are just some nasty liberal attack, orchestrated by Hillary in the basement of a Washington pizzaria, or something.
 
Nutsin
Posts: 3687
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Beauty and elegance!

THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Fauxstralian wrote: 31 Jan 2026, 07:52 Luckily in America no convicted criminals are elected to public office
Not everything has to be linked to Trump.
 
We all already know you spend every waking moment furiously hate wanking over him.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Nutsin wrote: 31 Jan 2026, 07:32 Is this really happening?

It would have had someone not shone a light on it.

Right now I suspect his life is getting ripped to shreds looking for anything to bang him up.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6433
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 585 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 23:30
goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:45
Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:36
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
It’s pretty hard to put a positive spin on that accusation.
But thats it as its an accusation...not fact unlike the nonces and rapists in your beloved Vatican 
oh by the way I'm clearly not a Trump supporter 
No but you are a nonce. No surprise you’d stick up for your own.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 682 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Luckily in America no convicted criminals are elected to public office
Nutsin
Posts: 3687
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Is this really happening?

THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 23:30
goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:45
Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:36
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
It’s pretty hard to put a positive spin on that accusation.
But thats it as its an accusation...not fact unlike the nonces and rapists in your beloved Vatican 
oh by the way I'm clearly not a Trump supporter 
No, but you are, by your own admission, a rapey nonce.

Glass houses, stones, pots, kettles etc...
XKhammer
Posts: 1565
Has liked: 902 times
Been liked: 262 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:45
Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:36
goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:14
Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.

👍
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
It’s pretty hard to put a positive spin on that accusation.
But thats it as its an accusation...not fact unlike the nonces and rapists in your beloved Vatican 
oh by the way I'm clearly not a Trump supporter 
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1330
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 334 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Hammer I am" wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:08
only1billybonds wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
No not spot on, some were discredited but there are more than that, some were never investigated and says as much in the files. As for them being deleted, feel free to try and find the below on the DoJ website, you can't, because they're already gone 
They haven't deleted anything and the complainant was found not credible.

The files are suffering from the amount of traffic of desperate morons thinking that there is going to be something there that can be cause for impeachment or worse. It's not going to happen.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 682 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Believe this Melania film cost $75m including $35m on marketing & promotion 
Financed by Jeff Bezos of Amazon who will benefit to much more than that despite the ticket sales being a car crash
The director has had multiple sexual assault allegations against him by actresses so I guess he will have something to chat to the President about at the premiere 
Hello Mrs. Jones
Posts: 409
Old WHO Number: 224273
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 78 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hello Mrs. Jones »

Nutloaf. I suppose this weekend you will be snuggled up with a large bucket of popcorn and a box of tissues watching Melania. She got $28m for this turkey, adding to the Trump grift.
One critic said, 'it was so bad that even passengers watching on a plane walked out'. Another 'I would rather have a glass shard enema that watch that again'.
 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6433
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 585 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:36
goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:14
Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:06
Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.

👍
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
It’s pretty hard to put a positive spin on that accusation.
Nutsin
Posts: 3687
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:14
Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:06
only1billybonds wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.

👍
Point being if you listen to the BBC you’ll listen to anything. Especially if it’s reporting a negative on Trump.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6433
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 585 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 21:06
only1billybonds wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
Great point, apart from the fact that the below link has nothing to do with the BBC, and hasn’t been mentioned by the BBC.

👍
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

only1billybonds wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
No not spot on, some were discredited but there are more than that, some were never investigated and says as much in the files. As for them being deleted, feel free to try and find the below on the DoJ website, you can't, because they're already gone 
Nutsin
Posts: 3687
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

only1billybonds wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:55 Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Goose believes! He believes anything the BBC will tell him.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2677
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 668 times
Been liked: 1043 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Yep,spot on Jaan. Laws were practically being made up in an effort to nail Trump. Does anyone really believe that there was proof out there that could ruin him forever and that 'proof' was sat on?
Do fuck off!
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1330
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 334 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

They haven't been deleted, and they have all been investigated and found to be false allegations.

Anyone who thinks the Democrats sat on the Epstein files  for 4 years without checking to find prosecutable evidence against Trump is a moron. They were literally working with Epstein in Trump's first term and came up with nothing back then.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

goose wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 20:18 Is that legit??
Yep, they're all being deleted as we speak, good job thousands have already saved them 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6433
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 585 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Is that legit??
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6433
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 585 times
Been liked: 1126 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Received On: 07/04/2016
Receipt Method: TelephoneIncident 
Type: Criminal ActivityComplaint 
Details:On 07/04/2016 at 2:16 EST, cellular telephone number office address ocate in home addresslocated in contacted the Public attorney to Jane Doe, to report the sexual exploitation and rape of a minor child of 13 years of age by Donald J Trump and Jeffrey E Epstein.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2677
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 668 times
Been liked: 1043 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Got to hand it to Starmer when it comes to springing into action. After a mere 19 months and a record number of new surgeons and architects hitting our shores he's raced into plan B. Plan A was ' smash the gangs'. After the resounding success of this he,'s now engaging in operation 'smash the engines'

Honestly, has there ever been such a weak and despicable 'leader' of any nation in the history of mankind? Everyone knows that if we give the illegals fuck all upon arriving here the numbers will be halved within a week. He knows it, all of his predecessors going back to Major knew it yet not one of them had the balls to do it properly. I
I have some reservations about Farage but he can dispel any doubts by fronting up and being true to his rhetoric over the past few years. Should he get in of course.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

Also another mention of trump sexually assaulting a minor but that one was quickly deleted, got a screenshot but too large to post here 
Post Reply