Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1492
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 336 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Misogynist anti white working class ‘BANTER’ from Nigel’s Nazi Army

Ever kissed a girl, SON?
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8548
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4969 times
Been liked: 2669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

I reckon her cսnt stinks rotten. Proper surströmming notes that you could pick up before she enters a room. Doesn't bother to wash at all so to save the planet. 

"Oh fucking hell Bill open the window, Hannah's coming.."



مجھے لگتا ہے کہ اس کی بدبو بوسیدہ ہے۔ مناسب سرسٹرمنگ نوٹ کرتی ہے کہ آپ اسے کمرے میں داخل ہونے سے پہلے اٹھا سکتے ہیں۔ سیارے کو بچانے کے لیے بالکل بھی دھونے کی زحمت نہیں کرتا۔ 

"اوہ فکنگ ہیل بل کھڑکی کھولو، حنا آرہی ہے۔"
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1254
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 545 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post wils »

Should say that this Green MP doesn't struck me that she comes from a social class that produces plumbers. She looks, dresses and behaves northern middle-class to me. But if she had the politics that appealed to the average cockney geezer that frequent this thread I think she would have her own grrr thread by now.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8548
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4969 times
Been liked: 2669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

OK_Guy wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 13:54
Massive Attack" wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 13:43 یہ برطانیہ میں بنائے گئے تمام غیر قانونی تارکین وطن، سائلو اور یہودی بستیوں کی فتح ہے جو مقامی برطانوی لوگوں کے ساتھ بہت کم برطانوی اقدار کا اشتراک کرتے ہیں۔ پرانی سڑنے والی چوت کا کتنا بوجھ ہے۔
It is a victory for all the illegal immigrants, silos and ghettos built in Britain who share very little British values with the local British people. How much burden is the old rotting chute?

In Urdu, close..

This is a victory for all the illegal immigrants, silos and ghettos built in Britain who share very few British values ​​with the native British people. What a load of old rotting shit.


The Official language now in this Country apparently. So thought I'd do my bit to assimilate and integrate using their mother tongue instead.
OK_Guy
Posts: 284
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 418 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

Massive Attack" wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 13:43 یہ برطانیہ میں بنائے گئے تمام غیر قانونی تارکین وطن، سائلو اور یہودی بستیوں کی فتح ہے جو مقامی برطانوی لوگوں کے ساتھ بہت کم برطانوی اقدار کا اشتراک کرتے ہیں۔ پرانی سڑنے والی چوت کا کتنا بوجھ ہے۔
It is a victory for all the illegal immigrants, silos and ghettos built in Britain who share very little British values with the local British people. How much burden is the old rotting chute?
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1492
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 336 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

Yes, now that Britishness is threatened by 30 years and counting of mass, unprecedented, open door immigration policies that has led to the following, amongst other things:

- Multiple stabbing attacks in major cities
- The bombing of a concert in Manchester killing children and adults
- The cold blooded stabbing murders of three little girls in a Taylor Swift themed workshop
- A major, co-ordinated terrorist attack on 7th July 2005 which killed 50 people and injured hundreds others
- Sectarian Muslim first candidates and sectarian Muslim first block voting
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8548
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4969 times
Been liked: 2669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

یہ برطانیہ میں بنائے گئے تمام غیر قانونی تارکین وطن، سائلو اور یہودی بستیوں کی فتح ہے جو مقامی برطانوی لوگوں کے ساتھ بہت کم برطانوی اقدار کا اشتراک کرتے ہیں۔ پرانی سڑنے والی چوت کا کتنا بوجھ ہے۔
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1254
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 545 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post wils »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 13:22
wils wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 12:35
zebthecat wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 10:50 The fastest growth in religion accroding to the last census is "No religion" at 38% close behind Christian at 47%.
Islam was 7% and growing slower.






 
 
There are some caveats to this. Look at the fertility rates for atheists compared to Muslims. Secondly look at the age demographics of that religion spread. Muslims are the youngest demographic and in London represent 15% of the population as it's a young population. In London school's, 33% of the pupils are muslims.

With sectarian politics here, as us older white majority die off, this will define the next generation.

The muslim proportion of the population is growing and we can debate about how quickly but with chain migration the rate will only increase so their dominance is about when and not if. So if you think it's alarmist then I have a question for you. What are you expecting to change to stabilise their rate of growth?

Finally I should add I am married to Turk (albeit an atheist) but have many headscarfed practicing muslims in my extended family and friend group. They even held an Iftar in our home last year. I am personally ok with Muslims themselves and hold no prejudice against them. But it's a fact if they reach even a significant minority, which they arguably already are, we will face a Northern Ireland style political landscape.
Agree with a lot of that.

The freedoms we offer as a country to immigrants should come with. to use a popular idiom, caveats. We should probably and probably legally expect all immigrants to:
  1. Respect the monarchy and religion of the/our country as a pinnacle with non-changeable status,
  2. Live and abide by the rules and accepted norms of their chosen adopted country,
  3. Give the same respect to those who's beliefs differ from theirs as that which they expect/demand others to give to their beliefs.
  4. Fuck off completely if they believe in any sort of "god".
OK - number 4 is a bit tongue in cheek, but immigrants can do that belief shit in their own country. We don't need their help to do it in ours.
 
 
I see where you're coming from. But this still means the host country takes a hit. Because, historically, with a stable homogenised demos we were able to be liberal and thrive without needing to codify what it means to be British.

British was the water we swam in and, like fish who didn't know they were wet, we didn't need to know or care what it meant to be British. That gave us a lot of freedom and amongst other things underpinned a liberal society. But now that Britishness is threatened, we need to codify what being British means (like you have attempted with this post) and the consequences of that will be a less liberal and authoritarian state.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

How dare those British Muslims vote for candidates that they think will be more advantageous to them personally?
And not for the dismal Labour or the party that would happily deport them 
Isnt that how democracy works?

The Reform candidate seemed a gormless wet wipe 
Finding candidates who aren’t twats , domestic abusers or straight out racists will be their biggest problem going forward
They have a collection of failed Tories though. If that’s what you want

 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5525
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 796 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

wils wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 12:35
zebthecat wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 10:50 The fastest growth in religion accroding to the last census is "No religion" at 38% close behind Christian at 47%.
Islam was 7% and growing slower.



 
 
There are some caveats to this. Look at the fertility rates for atheists compared to Muslims. Secondly look at the age demographics of that religion spread. Muslims are the youngest demographic and in London represent 15% of the population as it's a young population. In London school's, 33% of the pupils are muslims.

With sectarian politics here, as us older white majority die off, this will define the next generation.

The muslim proportion of the population is growing and we can debate about how quickly but with chain migration the rate will only increase so their dominance is about when and not if. So if you think it's alarmist then I have a question for you. What are you expecting to change to stabilise their rate of growth?

Finally I should add I am married to Turk (albeit an atheist) but have many headscarfed practicing muslims in my extended family and friend group. They even held an Iftar in our home last year. I am personally ok with Muslims themselves and hold no prejudice against them. But it's a fact if they reach even a significant minority, which they arguably already are, we will face a Northern Ireland style political landscape.
Agree with a lot of that.

The freedoms we offer as a country to immigrants should come with. to use a popular idiom, caveats. We should probably and probably legally expect all immigrants to:
  1. Respect the monarchy and religion of the/our country as a pinnacle with non-changeable status,
  2. Live and abide by the rules and accepted norms of their chosen adopted country,
  3. Give the same respect to those who's beliefs differ from theirs as that which they expect/demand others to give to their beliefs.
  4. Fuck off completely if they believe in any sort of "god".
OK - number 4 is a bit tongue in cheek, but immigrants can do that belief shit in their own country. We don't need their help to do it in ours.
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1254
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 545 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post wils »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 10:50 The fastest growth in religion accroding to the last census is "No religion" at 38% close behind Christian at 47%.
Islam was 7% and growing slower.


 
 
 
There are some caveats to this. Look at the fertility rates for atheists compared to Muslims. Secondly look at the age demographics of that religion spread. Muslims are the youngest demographic and in London represent 15% of the population as it's a young population. In London school's, 33% of the pupils are muslims.

With sectarian politics here, as us older white majority die off, this will define the next generation.

The muslim proportion of the population is growing and we can debate about how quickly but with chain migration the rate will only increase so their dominance is about when and not if. So if you think it's alarmist then I have a question for you. What are you expecting to change to stabilise their rate of growth?

Finally I should add I am married to Turk (albeit an atheist) but have many headscarfed practicing muslims in my extended family and friend group. They even held an Iftar in our home last year. I am personally ok with Muslims themselves and hold no prejudice against them. But it's a fact if they reach even a significant minority, which they arguably already are, we will face a Northern Ireland style political landscape.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1492
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 336 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 10:50 The fastest growth in religion accroding to the last census is "No religion" at 38% close behind Christian at 47%.
Islam was 7% and growing slower.
My main take is the Conservatives polling less than 2% of the vote share. They are fucked.


 
 
 
Well those stats are just fake news.

Look at the Census data from 2001, 2011 and 2021 to see a truer reflection of where this country is heading.

In each of those Census surveys the white British population has declined significantly and the South Asian and Muslim and Hindu populations have risen significantly.

This is why we get sectarian South Asian politics in the UK now and battles and riots between Muslims and Hindus in places like Leicester.

It's the depressing reality.
Council Scum
Posts: 787
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Council Scum »

, wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 10:21 Scum, that link you posted up shows how the FPP system can be hijacked. This problem can be mitigated by having a PR system for Westminster votes.

It beggars belief that at a moment in time when the imbalance at Westminster is so stark the electorate, and politicians alike, are not clamouring for a more representative HoC.
What it shows is Muslims will vote for who ever panders to them the most, so any muslim heavily populated area, if you want to get in, you do what they want. 
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1254
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 545 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post wils »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 11:02 Because, of course, all Muslims are going to vote for a white woman in a party led by a gay Jew. 
They did. Are you not paying attention?
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2649
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 441 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mad Ferret »

Why was the other thread deleted?

stubbo you fucking mug.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2170
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 649 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

Reform didn't help themselves by putting up a misogynistic trad wife dingbat as a candidate.
Never go full MAGA in the UK. 
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 641
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Hahahaha!  Loving all the whining on here about those pesky Muslims voting. Because, of course, all Muslims are going to vote for a white woman in a party led by a gay Jew. The meltdown from the flag shagging roundabout painters, on here, is hilarious. Keep it up. 😂
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2170
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 649 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

The fastest growth in religion accroding to the last census is "No religion" at 38% close behind Christian at 47%.
Islam was 7% and growing slower.
My main take is the Conservatives polling less than 2% of the vote share. They are fucked.
 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

So what’s that figure?

Too woke to have IVORY in my tower , matey 
,
Posts: 1249
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 155 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

Scum, that link you posted up shows how the FPP system can be hijacked. This problem can be mitigated by having a PR system for Westminster votes.

It beggars belief that at a moment in time when the imbalance at Westminster is so stark the electorate, and politicians alike, are not clamouring for a more representative HoC.
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 2097
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BRANDED »

There’s a great few videos online tgat are interviews with a KGB officer from the70s/80s who ultimately defected. Obviously spies are not always trustworthy but what he says is,

For the commies to take a country they always used the educated left as useful fools. This is true of Islam too. Once the country is captured the fools are killed or put in gulags. 

 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1492
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 336 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

Well Islam is the fastest growing religion in the UK. And demographically South Asian Muslims, namely form Pakistan and Bangladesh, are the fastest growing ethnicities in the UK.

It doesn't take Einstein to work out where this is all heading.

But yeah, keep burying your head in the sand Sven and virtue signaling from your woke ivory tower.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4599
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Reform are wanking over the idea of ICE
Mass deportations if ‘you aren’t really British’

Any update on the proportion of UK registered voters who are Muslim and are going to take power ?
Before imposing Sharia Law & make you marry your cousin
The ugly retarded one
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5525
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 796 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Feb 2026, 07:27 Mike
Whats your take on the Conservatives?
The positive is that they DID manage to finish ahead of Sir Oink-A-Lot 🐷 of the Raving Monster Looney Party
No time for the conservatives at all.

They fucked up big time the moment they privatised the GPO/Post Office Telecoms.

Had they kept that under government control, even the most left leaning of Civil Service state departments could not have pissed the profits it was making, and about to make, up the wall.

If they have anything going for them, it's that they don't regard the wealth I've created down the years as belonging to them to spend on their mates pet projects as much as Labour do.
Post Reply