Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Who is our worst signing?

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Nutsin
Posts: 2754
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 298 times

Who is our worst signing?

Post Nutsin »

I’ve got Kieran Dyer.

Who you got?
BerlingtonBertie
Posts: 140
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post BerlingtonBertie »

Talking of that Lee Bowyer was a pretty shit signing too
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 517
Has liked: 306 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post One Sunny Day »

Billy Blagg" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 09:46 God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard. 
I mostly remember him for having an on pitch punch up with his team mate, when he was at Charlton 
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1815
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 326 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post zebthecat »

He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
That was a great deal given the impact both players made over time.
I never understood the stick that Bishop got from some of the West Ham faithful.
A couple of times I was sat behind a bloke in the West stand who shouted at Bishop relentlessly pretty much from kick off to the final whistle. I felt sorry for the poor kid who tagged along with him to the matches.
Council Scum
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 214 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Council Scum »

Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 11:05 David Kelly and Alan McKnight (mare) unfortunately just about done for Lyall.so must rank among the worst 

Macari his successor despite being a failed experiment actually made one of the most significant and valuable signings of modern times in Ludo.

He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.

 
And he signed Martin Allen as well. 
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 917
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Gary Strodders shank »

David Kelly and Alan McKnight (mare) unfortunately just about done for Lyall.so must rank among the worst 

Macari his successor despite being a failed experiment actually made one of the most significant and valuable signings of modern times in Ludo.

He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
 
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3609
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 954 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post El Scorchio »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 08:09 Benni McCarthy called Karren Brady" the devil with a set of tits". This comment was a retort after Brady had heavily criticized him in her newspaper column for his performance at the club. The public argument continued with each of them trading insults, with Brady famously responding to his sexist jibe by saying, "At least I'm supposed to have tits".

Hahaha
Good that she's handy with a pre prepared quip in her newspaper column, akin to the Richard Keys one, because she seems to be fucking useless at any other aspect to do with running a football club.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3609
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 954 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post El Scorchio »

The VAST majority we've been discussing have come under the current stewardship, no surprises. Granted massively inflated cost amplifies how bad these signings look in comparison to former generations but also scouting and recruitment strategy has moved on so so so far that it's inexcusable to miss so spectacularly so many times especially in an era where there aren't really THAT many bad signings, seen as most clubs are so sophisticated in how they run their football business and squads and recruit players to play roles in a system which allows everyone to flourish. Well run clubs like the three B's DON'T make bad signings, even when they are making big swings on more expensive players alongside the endless value they find, but even if they do it's not catastrophic. We have no long term plan or strategy and an absolute scattergun approach to transfers depending on the whims of Sullivan, regardless of any thought to the impact on the team.

Our litany of terrible terrible transfer business is indicative of how the club is run in contrast with those well run clubs. An absolute aimless directionless mess behind the scenes which has finally spilled out into the dressing room and onto the pitch as it has been periodically threatening to do over the last decade, but something or someone has always come along to bail us out just in time or other sides have just been that little bit shitter. Well our luck appears to have run out finally and our castle made of sand appears to be collapsing.
zico
Posts: 4423
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 439 times
Been liked: 246 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post zico »

Hales was a very good striker but by his own admission liked the contents of a brown paper bag and I think the club needed the money to rebuild after relegation and Hales was one who could command a fee and got another signing on fee so was quite happy. Felt sorry for Radford.  Ddin't he suffer a really bad jaw injury?  Think he left for Blackburn and promptly scored on his debut!  A lot of the below either suffered injuries or were just too old by the time they came to West Ham.  Kilman for what he cost and how he "should" be in his prime must be one of the worst. Worst signing compared to what we should have got was Bobby Ferguson.  Decent enough keeper but old Ron and his principles denied us having a fourth world cup winner in Gordon Banks.  Sliding door moment.
Mad Dog
Posts: 2282
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 167 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Mad Dog »

Most years we buy a player or 2 for about 2 mil, usually young player.  Then we never see them again

This year it's that celtic forward, cummings or whatever his name is
Billy Blagg
Posts: 135
Old WHO Number: 10135
Has liked: 55 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Billy Blagg »

Council Scum" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 09:52
Derek was a top bloke and teacher at my old school. He scored 10 goals in 24 games for West Ham in one season,  he'd be our best player these days. 
Good point well made. Wasn't he one of those who Bonds thought was a lazy, arrogant feck and disrupted the dressing room? I know BB loathed Ted McDougall (another bad buy).

BTW, my Hales reference was to the original debate some 25+ years ago. Hales wouldn't even get on the board now.
Council Scum
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 214 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Council Scum »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 09:57 Didn't Hales have an on field punch-up with Flanagan when both were at Charlton? Yeah Derek Hales was a hard bastard.
Yes mate. 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1615
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 646 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Didn't Hales have an on field punch-up with Flanagan when both were at Charlton? Yeah Derek Hales was a hard bastard.
Council Scum
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 214 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Council Scum »

Billy Blagg" wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 09:46 God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard. 
Derek was a top bloke and teacher at my old school. He scored 10 goals in 24 games for West Ham in one season,  he'd be our best player these days. 
Billy Blagg
Posts: 135
Old WHO Number: 10135
Has liked: 55 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Billy Blagg »

God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard. 
Rossal
Posts: 785
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Rossal »

goose wrote: 29 Oct 2025, 09:30 Savio was nowhere near £10m. From memory we only ever paid a couple of million for him.
Granted he was shit but the fee was all smoke & mirrors.
Even if this is correct he would still be up there for me even for a couple of mil!    He looked like that bloke from Soton who convinced Souness he was a pro. 
Lato
Posts: 294
Old WHO Number: 14079
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Lato »

Paulo Futre.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5362
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 462 times
Been liked: 959 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post goose »

Savio was nowhere near £10m. From memory we only ever paid a couple of million for him.
Granted he was shit but the fee was all smoke & mirrors.
honky cat
Posts: 1109
Has liked: 625 times
Been liked: 424 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post honky cat »

Not the worst but another disaster currently on the books is Cornet.
Council Scum
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 214 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Council Scum »

Rob Jones 
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3609
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 954 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post El Scorchio »

I’m not sure how to think about Savio in this context. Yes he was shit but I don’t think buying him was a ‘mistake’ per se at all in that our DOF or whatever his title was, that Italian bloke Nani did it on purpose knowing he was shit, to funnel money to his father in law or something at Ascoli? 
Lato
Posts: 294
Old WHO Number: 14079
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Lato »

Danny Ings.........but it could be anyone of the ones mentioned. A shocking and frightening thread!
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3467
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 828 times
Been liked: 1208 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Takashi Miike »

clown world

User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1615
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 646 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Zaza famously took a shot at the goal that went out for a throw in.
Rossal
Posts: 785
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Rossal »

For me its Savio, £10m was a decent wedge at the time and he was as bad if not worse than Roberto 

Kilman and Haller are also up there for wastes of money.  Felipe Anderson also deserves a mention 

Wilshere has to be in the discussion also

there were quite a few when we moved to the LS that could have their own chapter, Nordveit, Tore, Calleri, Zaza 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1615
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 646 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Benni McCarthy called Karren Brady" the devil with a set of tits". This comment was a retort after Brady had heavily criticized him in her newspaper column for his performance at the club. The public argument continued with each of them trading insults, with Brady famously responding to his sexist jibe by saying, "At least I'm supposed to have tits".

Hahaha
Post Reply