AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Who is our worst signing?
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1618
- Has liked: 403 times
- Been liked: 647 times
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 6083
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3484 times
- Been liked: 1796 times
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 520
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Marco Boogers has got to be in with a shout. As well as never going to sell shirts, with that name, a million quid for him was huge money, at the time. And all we got for that was 10 minutes of him trying to kill Neville before getting sent off and pissing off back to the Netherlands.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1756
- Has liked: 180 times
- Been liked: 292 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Does Mascherano count?
A supposedly world class player who couldn’t get in the side ahead of Hayden Mullins.
Along with Tevez, ended up costing us a lot of money. Though at least Tevez kept us up.
A supposedly world class player who couldn’t get in the side ahead of Hayden Mullins.
Along with Tevez, ended up costing us a lot of money. Though at least Tevez kept us up.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1618
- Has liked: 403 times
- Been liked: 647 times
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1416
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 295 times
- Been liked: 663 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
As things stand, Todibo has to be a good shout.
Fullkrug not far away in terms of output vs investment.
Danny Ings another that we spent a lot of money on for almost zero return.
There was obviously some real garbage under Redknapp and soon after.
Song was bad (especially given he was the Rio replacement). Dumitrecu....pursued for ages then barely played. Foxe another we battled for a work permit for for an age and then barely played.
Zaza, Tore, Nordveidt...all miserable signings.
Roberto was diabolical of course under Pellegrini.
The Chilean lad and Savio that were part of the master plan under Zola.
Plenty of howlers as I'm sure all clubs have.
If I had to pick one right now in terms of cost, what they've delivered, and impact on the side's fortunes....id have to say for me it's Füllkrug.
Fullkrug not far away in terms of output vs investment.
Danny Ings another that we spent a lot of money on for almost zero return.
There was obviously some real garbage under Redknapp and soon after.
Song was bad (especially given he was the Rio replacement). Dumitrecu....pursued for ages then barely played. Foxe another we battled for a work permit for for an age and then barely played.
Zaza, Tore, Nordveidt...all miserable signings.
Roberto was diabolical of course under Pellegrini.
The Chilean lad and Savio that were part of the master plan under Zola.
Plenty of howlers as I'm sure all clubs have.
If I had to pick one right now in terms of cost, what they've delivered, and impact on the side's fortunes....id have to say for me it's Füllkrug.
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 11:05 David Kelly and Alan McKnight (mare) unfortunately just about done for Lyall.so must rank among the worst
Gary Strodder too if I remember rightly. To be fair to John, Kelly was being looked at (apparently) by a lot of clubs and when he left he did quite well at Leicester, Newcastle and Wolves. Hiding to nothing trying to replace Frank and TC, plus I think inguries did for him in the end. Alvin, Galey, Ray Stewart, Dev, nonew of them could stay fit. Stewart Robson wasn't the best signing. Think the fans loved him because he ran about but he wasn't really a West Ham type of player.
-
BerlingtonBertie
- Posts: 140
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 31 times
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 520
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Billy Blagg" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 09:46 God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard.
I mostly remember him for having an on pitch punch up with his team mate, when he was at Charlton
Re: Who is our worst signing?
That was a great deal given the impact both players made over time.He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
I never understood the stick that Bishop got from some of the West Ham faithful.
A couple of times I was sat behind a bloke in the West stand who shouted at Bishop relentlessly pretty much from kick off to the final whistle. I felt sorry for the poor kid who tagged along with him to the matches.
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 591
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 214 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 11:05 David Kelly and Alan McKnight (mare) unfortunately just about done for Lyall.so must rank among the worst
Macari his successor despite being a failed experiment actually made one of the most significant and valuable signings of modern times in Ludo.
He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
And he signed Martin Allen as well.
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 917
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 13 times
- Been liked: 137 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
David Kelly and Alan McKnight (mare) unfortunately just about done for Lyall.so must rank among the worst
Macari his successor despite being a failed experiment actually made one of the most significant and valuable signings of modern times in Ludo.
He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
Macari his successor despite being a failed experiment actually made one of the most significant and valuable signings of modern times in Ludo.
He also bought in Bishop and Morley for Ward if I'm not mistaken.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3609
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 173 times
- Been liked: 954 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 08:09 Benni McCarthy called Karren Brady" the devil with a set of tits". This comment was a retort after Brady had heavily criticized him in her newspaper column for his performance at the club. The public argument continued with each of them trading insults, with Brady famously responding to his sexist jibe by saying, "At least I'm supposed to have tits".
Hahaha
Good that she's handy with a pre prepared quip in her newspaper column, akin to the Richard Keys one, because she seems to be fucking useless at any other aspect to do with running a football club.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3609
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 173 times
- Been liked: 954 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
The VAST majority we've been discussing have come under the current stewardship, no surprises. Granted massively inflated cost amplifies how bad these signings look in comparison to former generations but also scouting and recruitment strategy has moved on so so so far that it's inexcusable to miss so spectacularly so many times especially in an era where there aren't really THAT many bad signings, seen as most clubs are so sophisticated in how they run their football business and squads and recruit players to play roles in a system which allows everyone to flourish. Well run clubs like the three B's DON'T make bad signings, even when they are making big swings on more expensive players alongside the endless value they find, but even if they do it's not catastrophic. We have no long term plan or strategy and an absolute scattergun approach to transfers depending on the whims of Sullivan, regardless of any thought to the impact on the team.
Our litany of terrible terrible transfer business is indicative of how the club is run in contrast with those well run clubs. An absolute aimless directionless mess behind the scenes which has finally spilled out into the dressing room and onto the pitch as it has been periodically threatening to do over the last decade, but something or someone has always come along to bail us out just in time or other sides have just been that little bit shitter. Well our luck appears to have run out finally and our castle made of sand appears to be collapsing.
Our litany of terrible terrible transfer business is indicative of how the club is run in contrast with those well run clubs. An absolute aimless directionless mess behind the scenes which has finally spilled out into the dressing room and onto the pitch as it has been periodically threatening to do over the last decade, but something or someone has always come along to bail us out just in time or other sides have just been that little bit shitter. Well our luck appears to have run out finally and our castle made of sand appears to be collapsing.
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Hales was a very good striker but by his own admission liked the contents of a brown paper bag and I think the club needed the money to rebuild after relegation and Hales was one who could command a fee and got another signing on fee so was quite happy. Felt sorry for Radford. Ddin't he suffer a really bad jaw injury? Think he left for Blackburn and promptly scored on his debut! A lot of the below either suffered injuries or were just too old by the time they came to West Ham. Kilman for what he cost and how he "should" be in his prime must be one of the worst. Worst signing compared to what we should have got was Bobby Ferguson. Decent enough keeper but old Ron and his principles denied us having a fourth world cup winner in Gordon Banks. Sliding door moment.
-
Billy Blagg
- Posts: 135
- Old WHO Number: 10135
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 59 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Council Scum" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 09:52Derek was a top bloke and teacher at my old school. He scored 10 goals in 24 games for West Ham in one season, he'd be our best player these days.
Good point well made. Wasn't he one of those who Bonds thought was a lazy, arrogant feck and disrupted the dressing room? I know BB loathed Ted McDougall (another bad buy).
BTW, my Hales reference was to the original debate some 25+ years ago. Hales wouldn't even get on the board now.
BTW, my Hales reference was to the original debate some 25+ years ago. Hales wouldn't even get on the board now.
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 591
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 214 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 09:57 Didn't Hales have an on field punch-up with Flanagan when both were at Charlton? Yeah Derek Hales was a hard bastard.
Yes mate.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1618
- Has liked: 403 times
- Been liked: 647 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Didn't Hales have an on field punch-up with Flanagan when both were at Charlton? Yeah Derek Hales was a hard bastard.
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 591
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 214 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Billy Blagg" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2025, 09:46 God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard.
Derek was a top bloke and teacher at my old school. He scored 10 goals in 24 games for West Ham in one season, he'd be our best player these days.
-
Billy Blagg
- Posts: 135
- Old WHO Number: 10135
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 59 times
Re: Who is our worst signing?
God, I remember doing a Blagg column on this back in the days when WHO was the Ironworks - yea, it's been that long smartarse - my winner was Derek Hales. His only claim to fame was his astonishing ability with facial hair. I once saw him turn out at v Coventry at Highfield Road clean-shaven before the match. By the time 90 minutes came around, he had a full beard.
Re: Who is our worst signing?
Even if this is correct he would still be up there for me even for a couple of mil! He looked like that bloke from Soton who convinced Souness he was a pro.


