Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Smoking to be banned.

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
only1billybonds
Posts: 1892
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Smoking to be banned.

Post only1billybonds »

"Hot on the heels of the online safety bill, Sunak is considering bringing in a law that will make it illegal for anyone born after 2009 to buy tobaco products. This is nanny state on steroids, and must be opposed if and when a bill gets read. When i heard a couple of years ago that New Zealand were making this a law i really thought it couldnt happen here. Besides, all it will do is create a massive black market and amber leaf will become the new weed. I have'nt smoked for 6 years now but thats beside the point, and what will be next? Alcohol to be outlawed or at least limits put on how much you can buy. This is where we're heading, once we go cashless, the decision in what and how much you buy will no longer be yours to make. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/22/rishi-sunak-considers-banning-cigarettes-for-next-generation"
Mad Dog
Posts: 2050
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Mad Dog »

"Unless.youve been smoking for years and addicted to fuck, I've got no comprehension as to why anyone would smoke. Banning anyone under a certain age and letting it die out should be a no brainer. Fuck vaping too"
Jonah Lomas
Posts: 55

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Jonah Lomas »

"The only people really complaining about the smoking ban in NZ are the tobacco companies. It's estimated that our economy will be better off by $5 billion from reduced costs for treating smoking related illness. So, it's a sensible, pragmatic decision. Plus, it's a disgusting, damaging habit. And I'm a former smoker."
User avatar
ray winstone
Posts: 475
Location: Utopia
Old WHO Number: 33640
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post ray winstone »

"Just like Rishi stopping the 7 bins and meat tax, this is a win WIN."
Colchester Sid
Posts: 22
Old WHO Number: 211056
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Colchester Sid »

"Total taxes raised from tobacco and the tobacco industry adds up to less than 2% of total Government revenue So neither here nor there in the greater scheme of things especially as the tapering downwards of future revenue will be gradual and decades away from now But as noted up thread - all the kids vape now rather than smoke so banning tobacco seems fairly pointless, a bit like banning snuff"
Nutsin
Posts: 2241
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Nutsin »

Bit hard to smoke hash without tobacco.
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Vexed »

"riosleftsock 6:25 Sat Sep 23 Good point. Probably safer just to ban fanny ownership, then none of the danger inducing feminine hygiene products would be needed, cutting the rate of accidents on the roads considerably."
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 275 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post riosleftsock »

"Gary I have had a pipe for about 20 years, but only use it on christmas day with a nice cherry and vanilla tobacco mix from the local tobagganist"
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 752
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Gary Strodders shank »

Does anyone bang on a pipe anymore?
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 275 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post riosleftsock »

Vexed 3:25 Sat Sep 23 Better to ban certain tampax (bodyform?) products to reduce skydiving and roller-blading incidents
nychammer
Posts: 1413
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post nychammer »

"Good point Side - Vaping is a more socially acceptable for both Cannabis and Nicotine products, and its supposed to be healthier, but that still a lot of people living half their lives stoned and do we REALLY understand the health impacts of vaping. You are still taking something that is not air into your lungs."
RBshorty
Posts: 832
Old WHO Number: 211268
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 79 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post RBshorty »

No politician. Of any party are giving up the income smoking brings in. And BATS is one of the biggest companies on the FTSE 100. The City boys would cut any party off at the knees if they were daft enough to screw that money earner.
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Pentonville »

Jim C 1:11 Sat Sep 23 Thiugt ur comment was comedic genius then realised you were replying to RBShorty and not citing Russell fucking Brand lol
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3969
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"It might simply be that (most) tobacco & tobacco products have to be imported, but enough cannabis can be grown locally to satisfy national demand, even if a % is home-grown and lies outside the tax authorities reach."
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Side of Ham »

"Erm, the youth of today ie: those born from 2009 onwards are not into smoking they would rather vape….those born prior to 2009 can carry on with their poxy habit….the revenue will be dwindling anyway once those youths fuck it off…for vaping….."
bruuuno
Posts: 536
Old WHO Number: 20510
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post bruuuno »

I was just about to post similar nyc - the logic of legalising weed and making tobacco illegal is mad.
nychammer
Posts: 1413
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post nychammer »

How do you decry smoking tobacco and celebrate smoking weed in the same breath? That's exactly what is happening here. Cannabis product 'stores' are like corner shops here now and they cant open more fast enough. Both are filthy habits when smoked and Cue a massive mental and physical health epidemic in a few years that nobody saw coming. Its personal responsibility. ban smoking both in public and make consumers of them pay more in taxes and healthcare / insurance costs.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3969
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"Who's the duller, the dullard or the one who finds the dullard interesting enough to make time to respond to?"
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3969
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"Who's the duller, the dullard or the one who finds the dullard interesting enough to make time to respond to?"
Hammer I am
Posts: 281
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 68 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Hammer I am »

So we're going to have a bizarre situation down the line where 70 years will loitering outside the newsagents asking passing 71 year olds to buy fags for them!
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2682
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Fauxstralian »

Means those 15yo's & under would never be allowed to buy FAGS Anyone who is puffing now can carry on into their early grave.
1964
Posts: 137
Old WHO Number: 16261
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post 1964 »

"Am I missing something here , if your born after 2009 the you are under 15. thought it was banned for them anyway."
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Vexed »

"Fuck, you're a dull cսnt Oxsaw. I dont know how you manage such levels of consistency."
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3969
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Here's a thought: Why not extend the sale of diesel & petrol for a few more years and allow that once anticipated loss of fuel duty cover the loss in tobacco tax?
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Vexed »

"I had a relative who died in a skydiving accident, I think we should ban aeroplanes. And clouds. And pizza."
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 752
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Gary Strodders shank »

"Fags, betting and no doubt booze will be on the hit list soon. My old man and other family members died from emphysema / COPD and it was heartbreaking to watch them struggle to breath and in the case of my old man having a CPAP mask strapped to his face for 23 hours a day, however I would still be against any ban purely because I feel all out liberties are gradually being eroded and there is already all the information and warnings out there for people to make there own decisions. Tax as already mentioned will be the reason it doesn't happen (yet)"
Post Reply