Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
charleyfarley
Posts: 546
Old WHO Number: 13854
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 11 times

‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post charleyfarley »

"Wolves V West Ham Molineux 6th Apr 15:00 GMT VAR Tim Robinson Tony Harrington (6) (22) (1) Wolves:- S?°, Semedo, Kilman ¬©, Toti, S. Bueno, A?Øt-Nouri, Doherty, M. Lemina, Jo?£o Gomes, Doyle, Sarabia Subs: Bentley (GK), Traor?©, Cunha, N Lemina, Dawson, H Bueno, Chirewa, Fraser, Chiwome West Ham Fabia?Ñski, Coufal, Zouma ¬©, Mavropanos, Emerson, ?Ålvarez, Souƒçek, Ward-Prowse, Kudus, Paquet?°, Bowen Subs: Anang (GK), Johnson, Ogbonna, Aguerd, Cresswell, Phillips, Cornet, Ings, Antonio Wolves 6/4: Draw 12/5: West Ham 17/10 ."
Helmut Shown
Posts: 1292
Old WHO Number: 213307
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 63 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Helmut Shown »

The bloke was standing in an offside position right in Fabianski's eyeline. Not even Liverpool or Man Utd. Could get given a goal for that one.
Helmut Shown
Posts: 1292
Old WHO Number: 213307
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 63 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Helmut Shown »

The bloke was standing in an offside position right in Fabianski's eyeline. Not even Liverpool or Man Utd. Could get given a goal for that one.
Surfinglizard
Posts: 97
Old WHO Number: 10827

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Surfinglizard »

Fantastic result. We had to win. And we did. News on Bowen? Manager now being exposed for zero squad rotation. We will limp across the line but enjoy an away win.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2148
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Sir Alf »

"VAR and the gale force wind motms? ;-) Actually Moyes has one trait I admire. He’s one fvcking lucky manager. Just when you think he’s finally done he eeks out a win. 2nd half more attacking formation with Emerson pushing forward from deep, JWP deeper helped and Soucek had to be replaced as u cant have him and JWP in the midfield and he was invisible for a lot of the first half. Moyes got the selections and tactics all wrong first half but fair play, he deserves credit for getting the subs correct and bringing some balance to the side as well as plugging a few holes in that 2nd half and finally getting us to play on the proverbial “front foot”. Emerson was the my MOTM for us. Great going forward. Johnson has a rickett in him but he did make a difference as did the presence of Antonio 2nd half. Kudus and Paqueta had off days by their standards but still key players. Zouma, Dinos were solid. Lets hope we are entering a streak of good fortune for Thurs because we will really miss Alvarez again"
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3363
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1817 times
Been liked: 888 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Massive Attack »

"Fantastic win and all 3 points in the bag. OK, it was due to a freak flukey goal via the wind that was never intended as a shot and a disallowed goal at the end which should have stood but we'll take it nonetheless. Relying on set pieces is what we do. Wolves seemed to be far more badly effected by the injury loss of the impressive Ait-nouri than we did Bowen going off thankfully and due to a lengthy injury list O'Neil had to rely on a bunch of inexperienced kids."
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3363
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1817 times
Been liked: 888 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Massive Attack »

"Fantastic win and all 3 points in the bag. OK, it was due to a freak flukey goal via the wind that was never intended as a shot and a disallowed goal at the end which should have stood but we'll take it nonetheless. Relying on set pieces is what we do. Wolves seemed to be far more badly effected by the injury loss of the impressive Ait-nouri than we did Bowen going off thankfully and due to a lengthy injury list O'Neil had to rely on a bunch of inexperienced kids."
Nutsin
Posts: 2241
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Nutsin »

"Great win that. That’ll hopefully quiten the wanky lot this week. To win that in front of a Europa quarter final isn’t an easy ask, it’s an easy game to look past. Moysies boys have got me Dave dreaming!"
Nutsin
Posts: 2241
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Nutsin »

"Great win that. That’ll hopefully quiten the wanky lot this week. To win that in front of a Europa quarter final isn’t an easy ask, it’s an easy game to look past. Moysies boys have got me Dave dreaming!"
claypole
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 240662
Has liked: 30 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post claypole »

1st half was absolute Mcdogshit but thought 2nd was better not sure if it all was a coincidence or Moyes orchestrated that
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 781
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 99 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post RootsRadical »

About time it went out way. Only downside was the Geordies getting a late winner.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Key game and result this. Delighted.
lowlife
Posts: 972
Old WHO Number: 213354
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 150 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post lowlife »

I’d be pissed off if we had one disallowed for that.
arsene york-hunt
Posts: 466
Old WHO Number: 290510
Been liked: 7 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post arsene york-hunt »

Fuck me we've got a vAR decision.
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 781
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 99 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post RootsRadical »

"I give up fucking sick of it, how many times, 12th minute of injury time. Pathetic cunts."
Tomshardware
Posts: 689
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 64 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Tomshardware »

"Lucky, for once it goes our way."
David L
Posts: 65
Old WHO Number: 10179

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post David L »

So still only 2 wins this year....
claypole
Posts: 591
Old WHO Number: 240662
Has liked: 30 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post claypole »

3 cheers for VAR
User avatar
Elpojohn
Posts: 231
Location: from Baden Baden to Walla Walla by way of Addis Ababa .
Old WHO Number: 233611
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post Elpojohn »

"Wow, Something goes our way. Hooray"
stewey
Posts: 130
Old WHO Number: 17909
Been liked: 15 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post stewey »

Feeling much better now COYI
pdcwhu
Posts: 266
Old WHO Number: 15211
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post pdcwhu »

Gilmore your back over us again so
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post happygilmore »

disallowed ha ha ...Moyes IN
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post happygilmore »

disallowed ha ha ...Moyes IN
DukeofDevo
Posts: 255
Old WHO Number: 20989
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 3 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post DukeofDevo »

You utter utter cunts!
master
Posts: 32
Old WHO Number: 16092
Has liked: 3 times

Re: ‚ö? Wolves v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post master »

Fucks sake. Moyes out.
Post Reply