AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Fury v Usyk
-
- Posts: 196
- Old WHO Number: 307525
Fury v Usyk
Fury to win? Usyk to win? Draw? Called off at the last moment? Fixed? Not interested? May have to actually pay form this one as I can't be fucked arsing around with shit streams that buffer every 3 seconds. Fury inside 8 if he is 100% prepared Usyk on points if he has a good night Draw for the purpose of a rematch and more money could be a good punt You cunts?
-
- Posts: 436
- Old WHO Number: 10197
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 13 times
-
- Posts: 370
- Old WHO Number: 17502
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 16 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
not one of u is commending my opinion. i was almost bang on. dont apologies but respect the opinion next time lol. read my breakdown of what would happen and why now if u ask nicely i will tell u what marvellous marvin hagler told me about the SRL fight. we had dinner and i finally had the courage to ask. give me a day or so to deal wtih a fellow hammer in trouible and then ill tell u xxxx
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 730
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 385 times
- Been liked: 256 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
zebthecat 3:45 With the ‘knockdown’ you’ve at least 6 points too many there mate ;-) Maximum of 228.
Re: Fury v Usyk
"Usyk was the better fighter, think that’s Fury’s lot. If he takes the rematch he’ll have to get some aggression in to him and I’m not sure he’s got that anymore. Usyk is nails, one of the best of the modern era."
Re: Fury v Usyk
"Fury thinking he won that when if it was anybody else that fight is stopped when his eyes were in the back of his head while he was staggering into the ropes. I wanted Fury to win, but Usyk was the clear winner. Shame Fury had to reference the war and claim it as a reason for the judges the decision. He should be thankful he got a split decision. It should have been unanimous. A cruiserweight dominating the so called best heavyweight division for years."
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3036
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
"ended up a comfortable win. fury, if he takes the rematch needs to start faster and realise that he's not going to outbox usyk. tyson showed he could hurt him but a more aggressive approach may lead to a knock out. usyk's a great champion"
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3036
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
"ended up a comfortable win. fury, if he takes the rematch needs to start faster and realise that he's not going to outbox usyk. tyson showed he could hurt him but a more aggressive approach may lead to a knock out. usyk's a great champion"
-
- Posts: 674
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 56 times
- Been liked: 135 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
"I thought Usyk would do it or it would draw. I just think he’s a better boxer overall. Wish Fury would have some class and not go one about the war and shit. Same with Joshua when he lost. Is that just a British thing to talk shit after you lose? Anyways, how fury recovers from shit is incredible. Never seen anything like it. But overall, that round done him. Cant get knocked out like that and win fights in my opinion. It’s not right."
-
- Posts: 194
- Old WHO Number: 212340
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 18 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
"I thought Fury had him worked out and then his ego took over and he forgot that he had to keep fighting for the whole fight. Once he went into cruise mode, Usyk came back like the warrior he is and Fury was lucky to survive to the end. Still think it could have gone either way. Lot of close rounds."
Re: Fury v Usyk
"Usyk showed his class there, especially from round 7 onwards. It looked like Fury had worked him out but that was an outstanding flurry of punches from Usyk. Fury should have gone down, but his pride was probably stopping him. Ridiculous that it was even a split decision, but at least Usyk got the result. It was a decent fight. I’m not sure if Fury has more to offer in October. It will be another lovely payday though."
-
- Posts: 892
- Old WHO Number: 34065
- Has liked: 48 times
- Been liked: 47 times
Re: Fury v Usyk
Deserved for Usyk. Hopefully the cսnt fucks back off to tarmacadam but there is a rematch clause....
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 202 times
-
- Posts: 892
- Old WHO Number: 34065
- Has liked: 48 times
- Been liked: 47 times
-
- Posts: 892
- Old WHO Number: 34065
- Has liked: 48 times
- Been liked: 47 times