AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Huw Edwards
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Huw Edwards
The convicted sex offender is in court for sentencing this morning. I would be amazed if he gets bird.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Huw Edwards
madeeasy wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 11:18The BBC just reported that the maximum sentence is up to 10 years, so I'm not sure where you got 12 months from.
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".I think the Mags can only give a sentence of so much for an offence, before having to send it to a crown court for a Judge to deal with.
Got you.
Just been reported this sick cսnt was paying paedos £1,500 for images. It will be a travesty if he doesn't get a long custodial sentence. Fuck his 'mental health issues'.
Just been reported this sick cսnt was paying paedos £1,500 for images. It will be a travesty if he doesn't get a long custodial sentence. Fuck his 'mental health issues'.
Re: Huw Edwards
The BBC just reported that the maximum sentence is up to 10 years, so I'm not sure where you got 12 months from.
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".
I think the Mags can only give a sentence of so much for an offence, before having to send it to a crown court for a Judge to deal with.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Manuel wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:58Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:56Because of his high status, his fame, his wealth and the 'contrition' he has shown (after getting caught, charged and convicted, that is).Since when has that mattered in the UK? I mean about his wealth/fame. Bigger people that him have got bird. Anyway, I just read that if Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months, so a load of bollocks anyway.
The BBC just reported that the maximum sentence is up to 10 years, so I'm not sure where you got 12 months from.
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".
Re: Huw Edwards
On a human level, somewhere inside me there is a little bit of sympathy for these type of people as they truly can't help it.
That said and overall, kids have to protected and I think these type of people should be put to sleep in a humane way.
That said and overall, kids have to protected and I think these type of people should be put to sleep in a humane way.
-
- Posts: 1059
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 329 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: Huw Edwards
I hope the dirty nonce gets bird and gets his ring battered by some other nonces. Then, again, dirty cսnt will probably enjoy that.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:56Because of his high status, his fame, his wealth and the 'contrition' he has shown (after getting caught, charged and convicted, that is).
Since when has that mattered in the UK? I mean about his wealth/fame. Bigger people that him have got bird. Anyway, I just read that if Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months, so a load of bollocks anyway.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Because of his high status, his fame, his wealth and the 'contrition' he has shown (after getting caught, charged and convicted, that is).