Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

WHO vs. KUMB

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

WHO vs. KUMB

Post Come On You Irons »

I had a look on KUMB yesterday and was struck by how much more active it is in on there. Multiple West Ham related threads, decent debate and much more activity.

This site remains moribund despite the good work setting up the new site. Seems the owners held out too long before sorting the server issue and the site has suffered as only a handful of active posters remain, many of whom are abusive keyboard warriors who offer nothing but hatred and pettiness.

I'm seriously tempted to bin off this site and switch to KUMB, and I can't be the first. Something needs to be done.
Dick Shaftsbury
Posts: 191
Old WHO Number: 319145
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 86 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Dick Shaftsbury »

I've never really liked it over there. It's so boring, could pass for a forum of Palace fans.

WHO is a bit more reflective of the fanbase I have always known. 

But yeah, in the 2000s this place was extremely funny. Not so much these days. 
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1059
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 327 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Russ of the BML »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 09:08
Russ of the BML" wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 08:03 WHO is like being down the pub. From whenever I have checked KUMB, although rarely down the years, its like a model railway convention. 

I know where I would rather be. 
Are you suggesting that COYI is a tad "Thomas the Tank"?
I wouldn't dare....
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Manuel »

muskie wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 09:05 Anoraks and cardigans are mandatory on kumb aren't they?
I'm incredulous that some of those people are West Ham fans. 
I think all forums have declined, going the same way as fanzinnes as it's all youtube channels now.
Good point about the YT channels, folk can watch them instead and them comment if they so wish.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3967
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Russ of the BML" wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 08:03 WHO is like being down the pub. From whenever I have checked KUMB, although rarely down the years, its like a model railway convention. 

I know where I would rather be. 
Are you suggesting that COYI is a tad "Thomas the Tank"?
muskie
Posts: 69
Old WHO Number: 280711
Been liked: 9 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post muskie »

Anoraks and cardigans are mandatory on kumb aren't they?
I'm incredulous that some of those people are West Ham fans. 
I think all forums have declined, going the same way as fanzinnes as it's all youtube channels now.
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1059
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 327 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Russ of the BML »

WHO is like being down the pub. From whenever I have checked KUMB, although rarely down the years, its like a model railway convention. 

I know where I would rather be. 
norwaytips
Posts: 121
Old WHO Number: 14244
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post norwaytips »

I can’t say that I prefer KUMB, but this site has seen a big swing from debate to abuse and I really don’t understand why that is. I guess it’s up to the mods to run the site how they want to, but we can disagree with others and remain a bit civil. 
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 630
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 146 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

I'm seriously tempted to bin off this site and switch to KUMB, and I can't be the first. Something needs to be done.
Fuck off and don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out, you gigantic masturbating troll.

You doing that would be a major improvement.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3354
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Massive Attack »

Vexed wrote: 12 Nov 2024, 19:10 I am happy for COYI to fuck off and preferably die. How can we make this happen? 
 
 
Tell him the Club have just announced it's activated a clause in Lopetegui's contract to extend it for another 8 years.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Hammer and Pickle »

I think COYI is a depressed sub.
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Vexed »

I am happy for COYI to fuck off and preferably die. How can we make this happen? 
User avatar
oioi
Posts: 203
Old WHO Number: 33151
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 43 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post oioi »

I prefer the look of the old WHO in the same way that I prefer Upton Park to the London Stadium.

However, I use the new WHO and have an ST for the stadium.

Change and decay in all around I see.
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

fraser wrote: 08 Nov 2024, 20:01 Kumb is fucking tragic
as tragic as your coat at Blackburn rovers ?
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

, wrote: 08 Nov 2024, 16:40 Stubbo, I like your post of 16.44 but the genie is out of the bottle insofar as there being a reasonable debate on here. We know that within a page of responses there will be the usual suspects bickering with one another to the detriment of those that want to debate.

This Board has more or less lost its anarchic humour it used to have and what is left is something boring, repetitive and unimaginative.

Maybe the only thing that could be of help would be a return of the black font facility. Posters would come on here for a laugh back then but we’ve lost all that and need it back.
Comma.
you are the torpedo turd that refuses to flush.
it's admiral...but off you trot son
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

 KUMB is for  the  middle - class windbag smug cunts and the comrades
WHO is for past it  degenerates..misfits and truck drivers with a CB .
a safe haven for the Nigerian  trans community is up for grabs
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

kylay wrote: 08 Nov 2024, 19:39 Site traffic is admittedly down, but this site is unquestionably better than KUMB. COYI's torrent of negative, attention-seeking posts would be moderated out of existence on day 1 over there. Given time and space to breathe, this place will find its wings again. We'll have Blagg's Advent calendar in 22 days, and all and sundry will come out for that.


 
 
 
WHO is the only forum  I know that is semi - normal.
Kumb and their band of melts are a fucking embarrassment to me.

hammer205
Posts: 44
Old WHO Number: 22603
Has liked: 1 time

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post hammer205 »

Yes I agree the format doesn’t appear the same as old site. I came off kumb a long time ago probably when they too changed their site and the posters became dull and boring whereas who had a bit more edge to it
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:38 I think we should arrange a meeting with KUMB in a pub carpark
You wouldn't turn up 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post stubbo-admin »

Mex Martillo" wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 21:02
62Hammer wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 20:25 I will always come on here rather than KUMB - on here you get Vexed, on KUMB
you don't (I imagine).
Vexed is certainly the master of abuse. I haven't seem him in a while. Did he make the transfer?
Yup he's here and has posted since switchover.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post stubbo-admin »

Mex Martillo" wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 21:00
stubbo-admin wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:57
Steady wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:44 I’d always be loyal to WHO personally. The one thing I much preferred on the old site was the layout and seeing just the thread subjects rather than topic, last post info and number of replies, just doesn’t look as nice or as easy to use, but then I’m a bit stuck in my ways too







 
Eh? That stuff was all there on the previous site. We've literally copied that aspect of the layout.

Go here to see:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240714073 ... /forum.php

It has:
Subject (Topic), Updated By (Last Post) and Posts (Replies).

Is exactly the same, terminology aside.

Is it because you're browsing on your mobile and seeing the mobile layout, whereas old site only had desktop so you probably zoomed in and just cut off the right two columns?

If so just go into your mobile browser settings (top right) and click to view the Desktop layout....then you can zoom in to just thread titles and posters names like the old site without the mobile responsiveness.
I know what he means though Stubbo. On my tablet the actual post gets pushed to the left side. Roughly a third of the screen is Poll and Latest WHU news, a third is the posters name, number of posts, likes and that shit also a lot of white space, depending on the length of the post. And a third over to the left is the actual posts all squeezed up.
Not complaining, at least this forum works, the old one was getting unusable. Really good work and all that. Thanks
Can you send me a screenshot? And a screenshot of the old site layout I linked...I can see the difference then and if I can reconfig any of the columns...as I'm under the impression there is very little in it, but happy to try and improve if there is a notable difference.
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Mex Martillo »

62Hammer wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 20:25 I will always come on here rather than KUMB - on here you get Vexed, on KUMB
you don't (I imagine).
Vexed is certainly the master of abuse. I haven't seem him in a while. Did he make the transfer?
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Mex Martillo »

stubbo-admin wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:57
Steady wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:44 I’d always be loyal to WHO personally. The one thing I much preferred on the old site was the layout and seeing just the thread subjects rather than topic, last post info and number of replies, just doesn’t look as nice or as easy to use, but then I’m a bit stuck in my ways too





 
Eh? That stuff was all there on the previous site. We've literally copied that aspect of the layout.

Go here to see:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240714073 ... /forum.php

It has:
Subject (Topic), Updated By (Last Post) and Posts (Replies).

Is exactly the same, terminology aside.

Is it because you're browsing on your mobile and seeing the mobile layout, whereas old site only had desktop so you probably zoomed in and just cut off the right two columns?

If so just go into your mobile browser settings (top right) and click to view the Desktop layout....then you can zoom in to just thread titles and posters names like the old site without the mobile responsiveness.
I know what he means though Stubbo. On my tablet the actual post gets pushed to the left side. Roughly a third of the screen is Poll and Latest WHU news, a third is the posters name, number of posts, likes and that shit also a lot of white space, depending on the length of the post. And a third over to the left is the actual posts all squeezed up.
Not complaining, at least this forum works, the old one was getting unusable. Really good work and all that. Thanks
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post Mex Martillo »

goose wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:16 You can take the women’s football thread to kumb for starters.
Sorry Goose, I definitely ain't going to Kumb, you poor cunts are stuck with me.
62Hammer
Posts: 63
Old WHO Number: 226664
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 10 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post 62Hammer »

I will always come on here rather than KUMB - on here you get Vexed, on KUMB
you don't (I imagine).
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: WHO vs. KUMB

Post stubbo-admin »

Steady wrote: 10 Nov 2024, 18:44 I’d always be loyal to WHO personally. The one thing I much preferred on the old site was the layout and seeing just the thread subjects rather than topic, last post info and number of replies, just doesn’t look as nice or as easy to use, but then I’m a bit stuck in my ways too




 
Eh? That stuff was all there on the previous site. We've literally copied that aspect of the layout.

Go here to see:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240714073 ... /forum.php

It has:
Subject (Topic), Updated By (Last Post) and Posts (Replies).

Is exactly the same, terminology aside.

Is it because you're browsing on your mobile and seeing the mobile layout, whereas old site only had desktop so you probably zoomed in and just cut off the right two columns?

If so just go into your mobile browser settings (top right) and click to view the Desktop layout....then you can zoom in to just thread titles and posters names like the old site without the mobile responsiveness.
Post Reply