AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Come on Mike, you big old brainbox you, what's it all about...
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AxXE9UD1z/
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AxXE9UD1z/
Last edited by Massive Attack on 15 Nov 2024, 13:01, edited 1 time in total.
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Former British Telecom technicians know all about how the be at work while being down the boozer at the same time. It’s a kind of magic.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
- Cabbige Savage
- Posts: 221
- Has liked: 215 times
- Been liked: 243 times
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑15 Nov 2024, 16:17Yeah, right, and Paul or Tyson?!
As a girl's name? Neither sound particularly appealing.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑15 Nov 2024, 14:21 Quantum Physics is fucking nuts (probably why I love reading about it).
The main issue is that we lack the personal experiences and language to adequately explain it.
Monkeys haven't yet evolved enough. "To be or not to be?", in the quantum world is "To be and not to be." Them's the apples of reality.
Simple example.
Question: Is light a wave or a stream of photons (particles)?
Answer:Yes.
We lack the language to describe even light as it really is (See the double-slit experiment for a hint, and, no, that's not a reference to floodlit split-arse football).
What's more, everything at the quantum level is based on probabilities - What's the probability of an electron being in a particular place at any given time?
The reason a wall doesn't suddenly move 100 feet down the road is that the probability of all the particles in that wall moving the same way at the same time is infinitesimally small (but not non-zero).
The maths supporting this is solid but way beyond most; yes, even me for large parts of it. Almost nothing against which to reference it in the world we "know".
Quantum entanglement is also interesting as has been proven as a fact, yet still nobody is sure how it happens. The experiments are done with photons & electrons but I prefer a more humanity level description.
Imagine there are 2 tennis balls stuck together, spinning incredibly quickly. One Red, the other Blue but there is no way you can know which is which - it's a purple splodge.
Now if these tennis balls suddenly fly apart, there's then nothing (of which we are aware) connecting them; what we have is two smaller purple splodges (we haven't looked yet) moving away from each other.
Now, if you look at one - and only one - of these purple splodges, it resolves itself as either Red or Blue. Nothing really that remarkable.
However at the very instant you determine the colour of "your" splodge. the other - distant one - immediately takes on the opposite colour.
OK, you might say, what's the problem?
"Immediate" is the problem because information about "your" splodge can only travel at the speed of light to the other one and so, by the (currently understood) laws of physics there should be a (measurable) delay in the other splodge resolving and revealing it's "true colours". There isn't
How does the other splodge even know you've looked at "your" splodge, let alone then become the opposite colour?
Like I said. It's fucking nuts -and that's without even considering there's no such thing as a universal "now".
My advice is to go pour yourself a good stiff drink and ease yourself into the weekend. I tend to do so when reading about this shit and it gets too heavy. Don't get any answers but I give slightly less of a fuck.
Yeah, right, and Paul or Tyson?!
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Quantum spin is fucking mind bending.
Einstein didn't grasp quantum theory at first, he famously said that "God doesn't play dice" but apparently, he does.
Einstein didn't grasp quantum theory at first, he famously said that "God doesn't play dice" but apparently, he does.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
Quantum Physics is fucking nuts (probably why I love reading about it).
The main issue is that we lack the personal experiences and language to adequately explain it.
Monkeys haven't yet evolved enough. "To be or not to be?", in the quantum world is "To be and not to be." Them's the apples of reality.
Simple example.
Question: Is light a wave or a stream of photons (particles)?
Answer:Yes.
We lack the language to describe even light as it really is (See the double-slit experiment for a hint, and, no, that's not a reference to floodlit split-arse football).
What's more, everything at the quantum level is based on probabilities - What's the probability of an electron being in a particular place at any given time?
The reason a wall doesn't suddenly move 100 feet down the road is that the probability of all the particles in that wall moving the same way at the same time is infinitesimally small (but not non-zero).
The maths supporting this is solid but way beyond most; yes, even me for large parts of it. Almost nothing against which to reference it in the world we "know".
Quantum entanglement is also interesting as has been proven as a fact, yet still nobody is sure how it happens. The experiments are done with photons & electrons but I prefer a more humanity level description.
Imagine there are 2 tennis balls stuck together, spinning incredibly quickly. One Red, the other Blue but there is no way you can know which is which - it's a purple splodge.
Now if these tennis balls suddenly fly apart, there's then nothing (of which we are aware) connecting them; what we have is two smaller purple splodges (we haven't looked yet) moving away from each other.
Now, if you look at one - and only one - of these purple splodges, it resolves itself as either Red or Blue. Nothing really that remarkable.
However at the very instant you determine the colour of "your" splodge. the other - distant one - immediately takes on the opposite colour.
OK, you might say, what's the problem?
"Immediate" is the problem because information about "your" splodge can only travel at the speed of light to the other one and so, by the (currently understood) laws of physics there should be a (measurable) delay in the other splodge resolving and revealing it's "true colours". There isn't
How does the other splodge even know you've looked at "your" splodge, let alone then become the opposite colour?
Like I said. It's fucking nuts -and that's without even considering there's no such thing as a universal "now".
My advice is to go pour yourself a good stiff drink and ease yourself into the weekend. I tend to do so when reading about this shit and it gets too heavy. Don't get any answers but I give slightly less of a fuck.
The main issue is that we lack the personal experiences and language to adequately explain it.
Monkeys haven't yet evolved enough. "To be or not to be?", in the quantum world is "To be and not to be." Them's the apples of reality.
Simple example.
Question: Is light a wave or a stream of photons (particles)?
Answer:Yes.
We lack the language to describe even light as it really is (See the double-slit experiment for a hint, and, no, that's not a reference to floodlit split-arse football).
What's more, everything at the quantum level is based on probabilities - What's the probability of an electron being in a particular place at any given time?
The reason a wall doesn't suddenly move 100 feet down the road is that the probability of all the particles in that wall moving the same way at the same time is infinitesimally small (but not non-zero).
The maths supporting this is solid but way beyond most; yes, even me for large parts of it. Almost nothing against which to reference it in the world we "know".
Quantum entanglement is also interesting as has been proven as a fact, yet still nobody is sure how it happens. The experiments are done with photons & electrons but I prefer a more humanity level description.
Imagine there are 2 tennis balls stuck together, spinning incredibly quickly. One Red, the other Blue but there is no way you can know which is which - it's a purple splodge.
Now if these tennis balls suddenly fly apart, there's then nothing (of which we are aware) connecting them; what we have is two smaller purple splodges (we haven't looked yet) moving away from each other.
Now, if you look at one - and only one - of these purple splodges, it resolves itself as either Red or Blue. Nothing really that remarkable.
However at the very instant you determine the colour of "your" splodge. the other - distant one - immediately takes on the opposite colour.
OK, you might say, what's the problem?
"Immediate" is the problem because information about "your" splodge can only travel at the speed of light to the other one and so, by the (currently understood) laws of physics there should be a (measurable) delay in the other splodge resolving and revealing it's "true colours". There isn't
How does the other splodge even know you've looked at "your" splodge, let alone then become the opposite colour?
Like I said. It's fucking nuts -and that's without even considering there's no such thing as a universal "now".
My advice is to go pour yourself a good stiff drink and ease yourself into the weekend. I tend to do so when reading about this shit and it gets too heavy. Don't get any answers but I give slightly less of a fuck.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
This was supposed to be a "nice and easy one for a Friday", that I can't even post the fucking link correctly..
So anyways, who's going to win the fight of century, Jake Paul or Mike Tyson??
So anyways, who's going to win the fight of century, Jake Paul or Mike Tyson??
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 956
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 442 times
Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)
1. Follows Link
2. Gets message, "Video is no longer available".
Excellent. Would read again. SWT
2. Gets message, "Video is no longer available".
Excellent. Would read again. SWT