Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3351
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Quantum Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Massive Attack »

Come on Mike, you big old brainbox you, what's it all about...



https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AxXE9UD1z/
Last edited by Massive Attack on 15 Nov 2024, 13:01, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Former British Telecom technicians know all about how the be at work while being down the boozer at the same time. It’s a kind of magic.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3964
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Cabbige Savage" wrote: 15 Nov 2024, 17:07 funny when he turn black

Image
Swantum Leap. A rip in the Carpinium.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3964
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Massive Attack" wrote: 15 Nov 2024, 16:17
Yeah, right, and Paul or Tyson?!

As a girl's name? Neither sound particularly appealing.
 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3351
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Massive Attack »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 15 Nov 2024, 14:21 Quantum Physics is fucking nuts (probably why I love reading about it).

The main issue is that we lack the personal experiences and language to adequately explain it.

Monkeys haven't yet evolved enough. "To be or not to be?", in the quantum world is "To be and not to be." Them's the apples of reality.

Simple example.

Question: Is light a wave or a stream of photons (particles)?

Answer:Yes.

We lack the language to describe even light as it really is (See the double-slit experiment for a hint, and, no, that's not a reference to floodlit split-arse football).

What's more, everything at the quantum level is based on probabilities - What's the probability of an electron being in a particular place at any given time?

The reason a wall doesn't suddenly move 100 feet down the road is that the probability of all the particles in that wall moving the same way at the same time is infinitesimally small (but not non-zero).

The maths supporting this is solid but way beyond most; yes, even me for large parts of it. Almost nothing against which to reference it in the world we "know".

Quantum entanglement is also interesting as has been proven as a fact, yet still nobody is sure how it happens. The experiments are done with photons & electrons but I prefer a more humanity level description.

Imagine there are 2 tennis balls stuck together, spinning incredibly quickly. One Red, the other Blue but there is no way you can know which is which - it's a purple splodge.

Now if these tennis balls suddenly fly apart, there's then nothing (of which we are aware) connecting them; what we have is two smaller purple splodges (we haven't looked yet) moving away from each other.

Now, if you look at one - and only one - of these purple splodges, it resolves itself as either Red or Blue. Nothing really that remarkable.

However at the very instant you determine the colour of "your" splodge. the other - distant one - immediately takes on the opposite colour.

OK, you might say, what's the problem?

"Immediate" is the problem because information about "your" splodge can only travel at the speed of light to the other one and so, by the (currently understood) laws of physics there should be a (measurable) delay in the other splodge resolving and revealing  it's "true colours". There isn't

How does the other splodge even know you've looked at "your" splodge, let alone then become the opposite colour?

Like I said. It's fucking nuts -and that's without even considering there's no such thing as  a universal "now".

My advice is to go pour yourself a good stiff drink and ease yourself into the weekend. I tend to do so when reading about this shit and it gets too heavy. Don't get any answers but I give slightly less of a fuck.
Yeah, right, and Paul or Tyson?!
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 985
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 422 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Quantum spin is fucking mind bending.

Einstein didn't grasp quantum theory at first, he famously said that "God doesn't play dice" but apparently, he does.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3964
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Quantum Physics is fucking nuts (probably why I love reading about it).

The main issue is that we lack the personal experiences and language to adequately explain it.

Monkeys haven't yet evolved enough. "To be or not to be?", in the quantum world is "To be and not to be." Them's the apples of reality.

Simple example.

Question: Is light a wave or a stream of photons (particles)?

Answer:Yes.

We lack the language to describe even light as it really is (See the double-slit experiment for a hint, and, no, that's not a reference to floodlit split-arse football).

What's more, everything at the quantum level is based on probabilities - What's the probability of an electron being in a particular place at any given time?

The reason a wall doesn't suddenly move 100 feet down the road is that the probability of all the particles in that wall moving the same way at the same time is infinitesimally small (but not non-zero).

The maths supporting this is solid but way beyond most; yes, even me for large parts of it. Almost nothing against which to reference it in the world we "know".

Quantum entanglement is also interesting as has been proven as a fact, yet still nobody is sure how it happens. The experiments are done with photons & electrons but I prefer a more humanity level description.

Imagine there are 2 tennis balls stuck together, spinning incredibly quickly. One Red, the other Blue but there is no way you can know which is which - it's a purple splodge.

Now if these tennis balls suddenly fly apart, there's then nothing (of which we are aware) connecting them; what we have is two smaller purple splodges (we haven't looked yet) moving away from each other.

Now, if you look at one - and only one - of these purple splodges, it resolves itself as either Red or Blue. Nothing really that remarkable.

However at the very instant you determine the colour of "your" splodge. the other - distant one - immediately takes on the opposite colour.

OK, you might say, what's the problem?

"Immediate" is the problem because information about "your" splodge can only travel at the speed of light to the other one and so, by the (currently understood) laws of physics there should be a (measurable) delay in the other splodge resolving and revealing  it's "true colours". There isn't

How does the other splodge even know you've looked at "your" splodge, let alone then become the opposite colour?

Like I said. It's fucking nuts -and that's without even considering there's no such thing as  a universal "now".

My advice is to go pour yourself a good stiff drink and ease yourself into the weekend. I tend to do so when reading about this shit and it gets too heavy. Don't get any answers but I give slightly less of a fuck.
claypole
Posts: 590
Old WHO Number: 240662
Has liked: 30 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post claypole »

Schrödinger's link theory.
You dont know if the link is alive or dead until you click on it?
Gank
Posts: 714
Has liked: 457 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Gank »

Oxsaw learned all this in nursery and still remembers every word.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3351
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post Massive Attack »

This was supposed to be a "nice and easy one for a Friday", that I can't even post the fucking link correctly.. 

So anyways, who's going to win the fight of century, Jake Paul or Mike Tyson?? 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Quantum entanglement (nice and easy one for a Friday)

Post stubbo-admin »

1. Follows Link
2. Gets message, "Video is no longer available".

Excellent. Would read again. SWT
Post Reply