AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
NFL (since 2016)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 10
- Old WHO Number: 264788
- Been liked: 1 time
NFL (since 2016)
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3037
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Bobby Wagner has had his thirteenth consecutive season hitting 100 tackles or more, surpassing that mark again on Sunday against the Titans . He's now tied with Ray Lewis, but still one season of 100 behind the great London Fletcher (still not in the Hall of Fame)
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 17:55 Jets wouldn't be playing for draft picks would they?
Yeah I don't think Rodgers is helping your cause much, throwing that much money at him, is not helping things.
Two of the many things I’ve learned about the Jets, Cough:
1. We’re never good enough to cherry-pick the games we win or lose!
2. We’re so bad at scouting and drafting that high picks have become irrelevant (Wilson etc). So tanking is a bit pointless.
But we are SO incompetent that I wouldn’t rule out us trying. And probably failing.
1. We’re never good enough to cherry-pick the games we win or lose!
2. We’re so bad at scouting and drafting that high picks have become irrelevant (Wilson etc). So tanking is a bit pointless.
But we are SO incompetent that I wouldn’t rule out us trying. And probably failing.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 14:11 Just four or five games to go in the regular season now. Looking like many of the same contenders again this year: Chiefs, Eagles, Lions, Bills, possibly the Ravens if they can get their act together on pass defense. Steelers, Chargers, Washington and Vikes looking to gatecrash the party.
Biggest disappointment (beyond the ever-present-in-that-category Jets) looks like San Francisco.
The Madden Curse.?
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 15:03 Vikings are winning ugly but I guess that's all that counts, innit?
I’m heading out to Seattle in a couple of weeks for our game. I’m fully expecting us to lose, but my Vikes mate coming with me is sure they’ll lose - and I’ve only ever seen us win so far…
So fuck knows
So fuck knows
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Jets wouldn't be playing for draft picks would they?
Yeah I don't think Rodgers is helping your cause much, throwing that much money at him, is not helping things.
Yeah I don't think Rodgers is helping your cause much, throwing that much money at him, is not helping things.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 15:03 Vikings are winning ugly but I guess that's all that counts, innit?
I'd take a win by bribery at this stage! The Jets' season must rank as one of the worst of all time, considering the expectations others had for the team (although, have to say, I always thought it would be a disappointment: never wanted Rodgers, never really rated Saleh as a HC and our o-line was put together on the back of a fag packet).
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 14:11 Just four or five games to go in the regular season now. Looking like many of the same contenders again this year: Chiefs, Eagles, Lions, Bills, possibly the Ravens if they can get their act together on pass defense. Steelers, Chargers, Washington and Vikes looking to gatecrash the party.
Biggest disappointment (beyond the ever-present-in-that-category Jets) looks like San Francisco.
Good
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Just four or five games to go in the regular season now. Looking like many of the same contenders again this year: Chiefs, Eagles, Lions, Bills, possibly the Ravens if they can get their act together on pass defense. Steelers, Chargers, Washington and Vikes looking to gatecrash the party.
Biggest disappointment (beyond the ever-present-in-that-category Jets) looks like San Francisco.
Biggest disappointment (beyond the ever-present-in-that-category Jets) looks like San Francisco.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Honestly, Joe, you couldn’t make it up.
The Jets entire coaching staff needs ripping up and starting from scratch.
Genuinely, I’m not sure if keep a single one of the coaching staff.
The Jets entire coaching staff needs ripping up and starting from scratch.
Genuinely, I’m not sure if keep a single one of the coaching staff.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
That Al-Shaair hit on Lawrence was disgraceful, btw.
It was a late slide by Lawrence, and he should have gone down with his head much lower - to protect himself. But all the same: the defender knew exactly what he was doing. Head-to-head contact, plus two forearms, while the QB was that upright. And he looked straight at the ref after doing it: knew exactly what he’d done.
Gotta be a straight ban.
It was a late slide by Lawrence, and he should have gone down with his head much lower - to protect himself. But all the same: the defender knew exactly what he was doing. Head-to-head contact, plus two forearms, while the QB was that upright. And he looked straight at the ref after doing it: knew exactly what he’d done.
Gotta be a straight ban.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 21:48 Almost lost for words.
The Jets just find new, innovative ways to lose. Every week. Today was ridiculous. How many times did we have Seattle at “4th and…” and then give away STUPID penalties - like having a returner (and 12th man) on the field?!
Seriously, it’s a good job Yank sports fans are not like our (WHU) lot: we’d have instigated an intervention by now.
Yet another losing season now guaranteed. And this was, according to some, supposed to be our run at the play-offs. Yeah, right! It’s criminal.
We had seven (SEVEN) attempts at 4th & 1 in one drive and fucked them all up - yet still won! Yeah, you bad
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Almost lost for words.
The Jets just find new, innovative ways to lose. Every week. Today was ridiculous. How many times did we have Seattle at “4th and…” and then give away STUPID penalties - like having a returner (and 12th man) on the field?!
Seriously, it’s a good job Yank sports fans are not like our (WHU) lot: we’d have instigated an intervention by now.
Yet another losing season now guaranteed. And this was, according to some, supposed to be our run at the play-offs. Yeah, right! It’s criminal.
The Jets just find new, innovative ways to lose. Every week. Today was ridiculous. How many times did we have Seattle at “4th and…” and then give away STUPID penalties - like having a returner (and 12th man) on the field?!
Seriously, it’s a good job Yank sports fans are not like our (WHU) lot: we’d have instigated an intervention by now.
Yet another losing season now guaranteed. And this was, according to some, supposed to be our run at the play-offs. Yeah, right! It’s criminal.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3037
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
no, you were right. its not been every year but we have played the cunts eleven times on thanksgiving since 1966
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
I've just looked it up, it's the Cowboys and the Lions v practically any team. Don't know why I had in my mind that it was Cowboys and Redskins and I lived in America for twenty years so I should know.
Anyway, the Lions and the Chiefs look likely Superbowl winners based solely on current form.
Anyway, the Lions and the Chiefs look likely Superbowl winners based solely on current form.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
I always thought in the past the Thanksgiving game was Cowboys and Redskins, for obvious reasons?
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Lions and Cowgirls have always been the Thanksgiving games. Going all the way back to the 50’s. Lions because they were a new franchise back then. And needed to strum up the interest. And the Cowboys because of the Texas viewing figures. Anyhow no surprise’s. And the Giants are still doing the business for that draft spot.Happy Holidays.!
GO G MEN.
GO G MEN.
-
- Posts: 932
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 175 times
- Been liked: 247 times