AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Lopetegui (sacked 8.1.2025)
-
- Posts: 177
- Old WHO Number: 21515
- Been liked: 1 time
Lopetegui (sacked 8.1.2025)
I was thoroughly looking forward to the start of this season
Was also prepared that things might take some time and wasn't expecting miracles over night What I didn't expect was a manager who after spending 6 weeks with the total dross he'd been left by Moyes would deem them fit to start in a premier league game And low and behold all of them played absolute shit
We're now 1 game in and none of our new players are any closer to bedding in or learning anything from their new team mates cos they barely spent a second on the pitch, half of them not at all I think it's gonna take somewhere between 6-10 games before we see the team anyone with an ounce of sense would play cos this bloke can't identify shit when he see's it I thought we was handed a miracle at half time when we went in level and low and behold he changed nothing I'm sure people are gonna make excuses for him and say it's too early to judge
But from what I've just seen today, this cսnt is David Moyes in a mission impossible mask
Was also prepared that things might take some time and wasn't expecting miracles over night What I didn't expect was a manager who after spending 6 weeks with the total dross he'd been left by Moyes would deem them fit to start in a premier league game And low and behold all of them played absolute shit
We're now 1 game in and none of our new players are any closer to bedding in or learning anything from their new team mates cos they barely spent a second on the pitch, half of them not at all I think it's gonna take somewhere between 6-10 games before we see the team anyone with an ounce of sense would play cos this bloke can't identify shit when he see's it I thought we was handed a miracle at half time when we went in level and low and behold he changed nothing I'm sure people are gonna make excuses for him and say it's too early to judge
But from what I've just seen today, this cսnt is David Moyes in a mission impossible mask
Re: Lopetegui
No, I think you need to grow up... or at least be mature enough to understand nuance.
Sorry that I seem to have to labour this but a manager can be hopeless and still win games. If you don't believe me take a look at the season under Avram Grant.
Semi final of the league cup, 6th round of rhe FA cup... beat Spurs, won away at Fulham on Boxing Day in the 'ultimatum game', yet comfortably our worst manager in recent history.
Let me spell it out for you. We won those games IN SPITE OF HIM
Sorry that I seem to have to labour this but a manager can be hopeless and still win games. If you don't believe me take a look at the season under Avram Grant.
Semi final of the league cup, 6th round of rhe FA cup... beat Spurs, won away at Fulham on Boxing Day in the 'ultimatum game', yet comfortably our worst manager in recent history.
Let me spell it out for you. We won those games IN SPITE OF HIM
-
- Posts: 2676
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Lopetegui
Typical dithering from Sullivan
You can just imagine the Wolves game
Their fans will be keen to be the team that gets him the sack after he walked out on them & O’Neill has been disgruntled after recent games with us and has been handed a chance to save his job.
You can just imagine the Wolves game
Their fans will be keen to be the team that gets him the sack after he walked out on them & O’Neill has been disgruntled after recent games with us and has been handed a chance to save his job.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Lopetegui
onsideman wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:41If we were to 'go on a run' (whatever that means) it would definitely be in spite of the spanish oaf, not because of him
Oh no, this (completely unfair) nonsense is one thing that puts my back up. You want to blame the manager when we lose, but when we win it has nothing to do with him?? I mean seriously son, grow up a bit.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
I've not seen anything about Ward-Prowse or Alvarez. Just Kudus for rightly getting taken off at Half-time for being dogshit at Brentford and Todibo going radio rental at Half-time when Bowen thought he was bang out of order for doing so.
If its the player's acting up, then they can either buck their ideas up or fuck off. If it was Lopetegui then he can fuck off, but from what's been said it suggests the 2 players have been the issue, not the other way around.
If its the player's acting up, then they can either buck their ideas up or fuck off. If it was Lopetegui then he can fuck off, but from what's been said it suggests the 2 players have been the issue, not the other way around.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3035
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: Lopetegui
I do fucking care and if it's coming from that cսnt, he's just passing on sullivan's words. As of tonight, and in the short space of four months, he's fell out with Ward Prowse, Alvarez, Kudus, Areola and Todibo. And these are just the ones we know about. He needs to go now
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
I don't care who it comes from if it happens to be true and it was indeed the player that was bang out of order.
If Bowen thought it was disrespectful and had to intervene himself to diffuse the situation, then I'd sooner trust his judgement than take the side of a Johnny come lately throwing his toys out the pram for not getting it his own way.
If Bowen thought it was disrespectful and had to intervene himself to diffuse the situation, then I'd sooner trust his judgement than take the side of a Johnny come lately throwing his toys out the pram for not getting it his own way.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3035
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
https://www.caughtoffside.com/2024/12/0 ... isrespect/
It seems it was the player that was out of order, not the manager. Not that he could have knocked anyone out with those girly spindly arms of his.
It seems it was the player that was out of order, not the manager. Not that he could have knocked anyone out with those girly spindly arms of his.
-
- Posts: 62
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 5 times
Re: Lopetegui
Keeping him is stupid. He's fallen out with key players, many are baffled by his tactics and the rest know he is hanging by a thread.
What good can it do keeping him, apart from prolonging a shit period of results?
Sullivan - an egotistical, interfering, malevolent individual. Why can't he just fuck off - everyone hates him.
What good can it do keeping him, apart from prolonging a shit period of results?
Sullivan - an egotistical, interfering, malevolent individual. Why can't he just fuck off - everyone hates him.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 956
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 442 times
Re: Lopetegui
All the stuff being leaked by Ex and Whetstone etc etc is just so depressingly familiar.
stay of execution
one game to turn it around
possible candidates not keen on short term deal
Fuck off West Ham.
stay of execution
one game to turn it around
possible candidates not keen on short term deal
Fuck off West Ham.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
I've already stated on here that I considered a run of at least 10 points from the next 6 matches after the Arsenal game leading us to the end of the year. That to me would constitute a run. That's when I was prepared to judge him fairly once most of the players were back from injury and suspension, as well as the manager himself now back on the touchline again.
viewtopic.php?p=422746#p422746
viewtopic.php?p=422746#p422746
Re: Lopetegui
We were very lucky to beat the Nigels and Man utd
We were fortunate to get a point at Fulham
All those results were achieved with Lopetegui at the helm but they dont make him a good manager. They were achieved through poor finishing and good fortune... in spite of the manager's selection, set up and tactics
Now define 'run'
Beat Wolves (possible with any manager, they're more awful than us)
Draw at Bournemouth?
Beat comfortably the worst team in the division in S'oton?
Is that a run? Or do we then have to beat the scousers?
We were fortunate to get a point at Fulham
All those results were achieved with Lopetegui at the helm but they dont make him a good manager. They were achieved through poor finishing and good fortune... in spite of the manager's selection, set up and tactics
Now define 'run'
Beat Wolves (possible with any manager, they're more awful than us)
Draw at Bournemouth?
Beat comfortably the worst team in the division in S'oton?
Is that a run? Or do we then have to beat the scousers?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
How will it? Apparently players can't stand him so how will they be able to get results and play well in spite of him, if that was the case? It would be down to the manager, just as the poor form this season has been.
Re: Lopetegui
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:37onsideman wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:36Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:33 What if though by holding our nerve not sacking Lopetegui, we then go on to beat Wolves and then go on a run whilst playing the kind of Football we want to see? Would that be acceptable?Sorry but your delusional. The bloke is clueless MA, let it goSo it wouldn't be acceptable?
If we were to 'go on a run' (whatever that means) it would definitely be in spite of the spanish oaf, not because of him
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
onsideman wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:36Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:33 What if though by holding our nerve not sacking Lopetegui, we then go on to beat Wolves and then go on a run whilst playing the kind of Football we want to see? Would that be acceptable?Sorry but your delusional. The bloke is clueless MA, let it go
So it wouldn't be acceptable?
Re: Lopetegui
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 21:33 What if though by holding our nerve not sacking Lopetegui, we then go on to beat Wolves and then go on a run whilst playing the kind of Football we want to see? Would that be acceptable?
Sorry but your delusional. The bloke is clueless MA, let it go
Re: Lopetegui
Now the choice of coach is not his Sullivan refusing to back or trust others. This will lead to no one decent wanting to come so he will say he had no choice but call Salthouse, Silkman or one of his cronies to get some uninspiring, old, washed up manager in.
welcome Rafa !!!
welcome Rafa !!!
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3356
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Lopetegui
What if though by holding our nerve not sacking Lopetegui, we then go on to beat Wolves and then go on a run whilst playing the kind of Football we want to see? Would that be acceptable?
- Snodders' Beard
- Posts: 45
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 12 times
Re: Lopetegui
https://vxtwitter.com/westham_central/s ... VVpeHRQMfQ
From approaching other managers to giving Lop the Wolves game and now ultimately, he's got an ambiguous "more time" stay of execution. What a roller coaster 48 hours!
Presume any self-respecting candidate cooled their interest when they learned that the parasitic poisonous porno dwarf only wanted to offer a 6 month contract as a "trial period".
How Sullivan has managed to amass the level of wealth he has is one of the universe's great mysteries and injustices.
From approaching other managers to giving Lop the Wolves game and now ultimately, he's got an ambiguous "more time" stay of execution. What a roller coaster 48 hours!
Presume any self-respecting candidate cooled their interest when they learned that the parasitic poisonous porno dwarf only wanted to offer a 6 month contract as a "trial period".
How Sullivan has managed to amass the level of wealth he has is one of the universe's great mysteries and injustices.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 956
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 442 times
Re: Lopetegui
He's a timid, risk averse little twat who always wants a 'sure thing' and in doing so gets the surety of mediocrity every time. Always more bothered with downside than potential upside.
The fans need to turn on him. He'll soon buckle when he's in the cross hairs as he's got no backbone. Spineless little runt.
Re: Lopetegui
Looks like we got Sloppyteacake for at least the Wolves game. Fuck knows what happens if we get a result. It sounds like they've sounded out managers and they ain't interested. Another Sullivan shitshow.
-
- Posts: 527
- Been liked: 140 times
Re: Lopetegui
nychammer wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 20:09THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 19:12 When Wolves do what every other team does against us and scores in the 1st 5 minutes get out of your fucking seats and walking to the directors box even if it means walking across the fucking pitch. Assemble en masse and give this cսnt everything. Stay non violent but refuse to disperse. Get the fucking game abandoned in front of the TV cameras and the World. Show them we are WEST HAM UNITED and we are done with Sullivan.That might also get us in serious hot water, you know how the FA love to punish us when they get the chance.
Fuck the FA. I don't give a fuck if we do it and they banish us to the conference as long as Sullivan gets disqualified from ownership and forced out. This latest bullshit is the last fucking straw. Lopetegui needs to fucking go we can all see it but the seedy little pornographer is taking us for cunts yet again, well no more. THE FUCKING LINE NEEDS TO BE DRAWN HERE. THIS IS THE HILL WE DIE ON. (Metaphorically of course.)