Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Graham Potter

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 615
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 176 times

Potter Graham Potter

Post stubbo »

https://www.whufc.com/news/graham-potte ... head-coach

​​​​​​In the past he's favoured a 3-4-3 formation...hard to see how we can do that currently with only 3 senior CBs, one of whom is injured. He's also played wingers (Solly March as an example) in the wing back roles.

Typically when a 3-4-3 gets announced on a match day the manager is immediately described as being too negative, too cautious etc. I guess it depends on the composition of the 4.

He's given young players chances...hopefully that continues at West Ham.

Welcome Graham.
 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Come On You Irons »

twoleftfeet wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 19:31
Come On You Irons" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 19:03
Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 17:54 Once orford came on . I thought we moved the ball quicker. Even the commentators picked up on it . But it's not ideal to put a youngster on  in that situation. While the teams playing so poorly. We've too many old players I'm just hoping kretinsky tripp smith and Vanessa gold see the problem and sideline the dwarf once and for all .
 
I thought Orford looked out of his depth to be honest. Clearly not good enough for this level.
This is very interesting, I hope you are reading this stubbo.

The 3 people that gave a thumbs up to this post saying Orford wasn’t up to it were -

Ladysmith
Mad Ferret
COYI

The same person but with 3 profiles.

Case closed.

As for Orford he is better than Bergvall and Bissouma.
 
 
Nope. I'm not the same person as Ladysmith or Mad Ferret and I didn't like the post. How can you like your own post?

You're not very bright, are you.
lowlife
Posts: 972
Old WHO Number: 213354
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 150 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post lowlife »

Yes -  these three profiles should be removed/blocked. I’m against stuff like this but every post is the same anti West Ham drivel.

I have blocked btw, but can still see their shit when others quote it.

Prick(s)
Last edited by lowlife on 19 Jan 2025, 19:54, edited 1 time in total.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post twoleftfeet »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 19:03
Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 17:54 Once orford came on . I thought we moved the ball quicker. Even the commentators picked up on it . But it's not ideal to put a youngster on  in that situation. While the teams playing so poorly. We've too many old players I'm just hoping kretinsky tripp smith and Vanessa gold see the problem and sideline the dwarf once and for all .
 
I thought Orford looked out of his depth to be honest. Clearly not good enough for this level.
This is very interesting, I hope you are reading this stubbo.

The 3 people that gave a thumbs up to this post saying Orford wasn’t up to it were -

Ladysmith
Mad Ferret
COYI

The same person but with 3 profiles.

Case closed.

As for Orford he is better than Bergvall and Bissouma.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Come On You Irons »

Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 17:54 Once orford came on . I thought we moved the ball quicker. Even the commentators picked up on it . But it's not ideal to put a youngster on  in that situation. While the teams playing so poorly. We've too many old players I'm just hoping kretinsky tripp smith and Vanessa gold see the problem and sideline the dwarf once and for all .
 
I thought Orford looked out of his depth to be honest. Clearly not good enough for this level.
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1138
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Keep dreaming »

Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 17:54 Once orford came on . I thought we moved the ball quicker. Even the commentators picked up on it . But it's not ideal to put a youngster on  in that situation. While the teams playing so poorly. We've too many old players I'm just hoping kretinsky tripp smith and Vanessa gold see the problem and sideline the dwarf once and for all .
Ideal in the sense that its a real kick in the bollocks to the old boys cunts. If there were a manager to fix this old shithouse squad, it's Potter. Let's give him time
Pshyco scored all 4
Posts: 193
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Pshyco scored all 4 »

Once orford came on . I thought we moved the ball quicker. Even the commentators picked up on it . But it's not ideal to put a youngster on  in that situation. While the teams playing so poorly. We've too many old players I'm just hoping kretinsky tripp smith and Vanessa gold see the problem and sideline the dwarf once and for all .
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post El Scorchio »

, wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 17:12 Like goose I don’t expect much more this season. By the beginning of last September I had decided that we would finish as a team above and safe from the relegation group.

Now we have a new manager I have set my personal target for him and it might prove to be difficult for Potter to achieve. I want Potter to coach our defence to concede an average of less than two goals per game. 
He’ll need some defenders worthy of the name to accomplish that. Hopefully Todibo is back soon. Kilman AWB  and him should be solid enough as a three. We are paper thin at wing back though on both flanks. 
,
Posts: 970
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 81 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post , »

Like goose I don’t expect much more this season. By the beginning of last September I had decided that we would finish as a team above and safe from the relegation group.

Now we have a new manager I have set my personal target for him and it might prove to be difficult for Potter to achieve. I want Potter to coach our defence to concede an average of less than two goals per game. 
Hello Mrs. Jones
Posts: 296
Old WHO Number: 224273
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 33 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Hello Mrs. Jones »

Fuck me Sir Alf you know your football. I didn't understand most of it but I'm sure youre right.
Potter OUT
Sir Alf IN
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2675
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Fauxstralian »

As regards the comment on Orford below
Thought he was neat in his passing as is always the case none of our players move to make an angle for someone to make a progressive pass
Our passing is pretty appalling & we flounder under any sort of pressing.
Utterly pedestrian yesterday 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post goose »

I have incredibly low expectations for the rest of the season. I don’t see us making any significant changes this January.

Potter has got time to work with the current squad and give some youth a go. Please no more Cresswell or Coufal or Guido.
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Maverick180180 »

Yeah I’m not criticising him coming on 
was actually excited to see what he could do 

just think if he’s going to make it he’s gonna need some good coaching behind him or sent out on loan in order to get his confidence up when it comes to playing against men rather than boys 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Mad Ferret »

twoleftfeet wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 15:34
Maverick180180 wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 15:23 Speaking of the youth, it’s gonna be interesting to see how Potter coaches Orford
cant say I’ve ever seen him play until yesterday but I know he’s highly rated
but he was like a deer in the headlights, played the ball sideways and backwards to the nearest player every time he had the ball
while its totally understandable that he’s a young kid making his debut and doesn’t want to do anything wrong so hes gonna play things simple, he ain’t gonna make it if he can’t get rid of the fear factor 
you can see it’s not an issue for Scarles, he gets stuck in, looks to play the ball forward if it’s on and not afraid to get the ball into the box, those are the youngsters that make it 
I’d say it’s now on Potter to get Orford in the right mind set 
I disagree, I thought he wanted the ball even with opposition players around him but our players seemed reluctant to do it. He is very similar to Lanzini in that he offers an out even when surrounded, the players just need to trust him.
Stop pretending you watched the game.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post twoleftfeet »

Maverick180180 wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 15:23 Speaking of the youth, it’s gonna be interesting to see how Potter coaches Orford
cant say I’ve ever seen him play until yesterday but I know he’s highly rated
but he was like a deer in the headlights, played the ball sideways and backwards to the nearest player every time he had the ball
while its totally understandable that he’s a young kid making his debut and doesn’t want to do anything wrong so hes gonna play things simple, he ain’t gonna make it if he can’t get rid of the fear factor 
you can see it’s not an issue for Scarles, he gets stuck in, looks to play the ball forward if it’s on and not afraid to get the ball into the box, those are the youngsters that make it 
I’d say it’s now on Potter to get Orford in the right mind set 
I disagree, I thought he wanted the ball even with opposition players around him but our players seemed reluctant to do it. He is very similar to Lanzini in that he offers an out even when surrounded, the players just need to trust him.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post El Scorchio »

Maverick180180 wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 15:23 Maverick180180
Speaking of the youth, it’s gonna be interesting to see how Potter coaches Orford
cant say I’ve ever seen him play until yesterday but I know he’s highly rated
but he was like a deer in the headlights, played the ball sideways and backwards to the nearest player every time he had the ball
while its totally understandable that he’s a young kid making his debut and doesn’t want to do anything wrong so hes gonna play things simple, he ain’t gonna make it if he can’t get rid of the fear factor 
you can see it’s not an issue for Scarles, he gets stuck in, looks to play the ball forward if it’s on and not afraid to get the ball into the box, those are the youngsters that make it 
I’d say it’s now on Potter to get Orford in the right mind set 
 
 
That was a horrible situation to come on in, to be fair to him. Can’t judge him on yesterday. A move borne out of necessity. There just wasn’t anyone else to bring on, and they had to safeguard against Alvarez getting sent off which he was probably pretty close to given how card happy the ref was for 11 of the 22 players on the pitch. 
Billy Blagg
Posts: 122
Old WHO Number: 10135
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 55 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Billy Blagg »

Excellent summation Sir Alf. I think had he kept the lineup we had in the first half we probably could have got a draw but the fans would have been on his back. Around me all I can hear is 'Get it forward' but it's patently obvious we have no way of getting it forward as no one is available for the pass. The ball that Eze put in to set Mateta free is something we don't have. Odd how many seasons we looked at Eze at QPR but decided not to do anything. We were probably happy to pay £50m for someone though...
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Maverick180180 »

Speaking of the youth, it’s gonna be interesting to see how Potter coaches Orford
cant say I’ve ever seen him play until yesterday but I know he’s highly rated
but he was like a deer in the headlights, played the ball sideways and backwards to the nearest player every time he had the ball
while its totally understandable that he’s a young kid making his debut and doesn’t want to do anything wrong so hes gonna play things simple, he ain’t gonna make it if he can’t get rid of the fear factor 
you can see it’s not an issue for Scarles, he gets stuck in, looks to play the ball forward if it’s on and not afraid to get the ball into the box, those are the youngsters that make it 
I’d say it’s now on Potter to get Orford in the right mind set 
nychammer
Posts: 1411
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post nychammer »

We have to give him time. The next couple of games promise nothing but heavy demoralizing defeats. Given little hope of anything with our injury problems and general under par squad we have to hope he uses this time to learn about what he has at his disposal and what we need. We DO still have to secure safety and despite being 10 clear of the bottom 3 we do have to have half an eye on the relegation battle, but I think we have done enough and the rest of this season should be used in preparation for the next. It’s back to the drawing board we go. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Mad Ferret »

Potter needs to realise that he’d get a lot more credit from the fans if he stuck in youth team players rather than wasters such as Cresswell and Guido.

We’re gonna lose anyway so just give the youngsters a chance.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post El Scorchio »

Sir Alf" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 12:25 Fair points Maverick but I suspect Cresswell came in so he could play a back 3 with 2 advanced wing backs to match up with Palace.  He switched Kudus central as we had hoped but tactically went with a “double pivot” of Alvatez and Rodruiguez to limit space for Sarr and Eze and Mateta who like to run onto balls into the channels.  It restricted Palace first half to one clear on target effort from Mateta but completely nullified us in an attacking sense. We couldnt get the ball or break out when we did and Kudus and Paqueta were starved of service.

He got that wrong but then changed things by bringing Soler on and ditching the double pivot. That just saw us concede almost immediately. Unfortunately the high press that got Fulham to make 2 mistakes for 2 goals failed when Soler, Emerson, Alvarez and one other attempted it against Palace, they broke they and in 3 passes to Mateta a goal was scored. Potter said that Soler was feeling a tight hamstring from Tues which was why he didnt start.  

Potter had 2 problems. Conceding “boat loads” of goals and with 3 first choice forwards out, no real recognised outlet.  He tried to start by not conceding but got the balance wrong, tried to adjust it and we conceded. The sending off just killed the game.

Lets see what we do at Villa. If Scarles starts and we go to a back 4 it might help although Alvarez or the U21 rookie will have to play as a CB? Who then plays centre defensive mid.  Got to hope Summerville is back.

in summary, would not selecting Cresswell and Rodruiguez have led to a better result? No one knows. Maybe but maybe not.  I think the wider point is its tough to be too hard on Potter with such limited options. Its not like we had experience and quality on the bench.  

Missing your best forwards 4 if you include Antonio, and inheriting a one paced central midfield and centre back partnership in the absence of Todibo, is a huge millstone to be carrying.  At this early stage ( 3 games ) Im not going to conclude anything. Its what happens next that is more interesting. Will Potter double down on the defence first approach to stpp conceding the goals? Best form of defence is attack was almost impossible yesterday but with Bowen and Summerville returning, thats the time to get a better idea of Potter. He will have proper alternative options.

imho of course 🙂


 
Totally agree. The bloke has almost nothing to work with at the moment and thanks to mavropanos we now have only one available centre back for the next game. Any manager would struggle trying to put out a good functioning side from what we have at the moment (and no that doesn’t extend to the guy who just left- he had nothing like the injury crisis in an attacking sense we do at the moment) 

Theres no way he wanted to put Cresswell in as a CB or play AWB as a wing back, or leave Soler out. That’s obvious. It’s just circumstance. What he needs is some support from the board and some new players in ASAP, even on loan. 
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post twoleftfeet »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 19 Jan 2025, 12:59 Could Potter do a Van Nistelrooy and go on a long losing run after winning his first Premier League game in charge?

Villa and Chelsea away next and I'll be amazed if we get anything from either game.

Appointing a new manager with a 29% career Premier League win percentage is hardly inspiring stuff.
🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Come On You Irons »

Could Potter do a Van Nistelrooy and go on a long losing run after winning his first Premier League game in charge?

Villa and Chelsea away next and I'll be amazed if we get anything from either game.

Appointing a new manager with a 29% career Premier League win percentage is hardly inspiring stuff.
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Maverick180180 »

I don’t think Emerson or AWB have enough end product to play successfully as wing backs, and in doing so were bringing players that just shouldn’t be playing into the team 
I just wanna see us keeping things simple with players, playing in their correct positions 
I don’t particularly rate Ings but right now he’s the only recognised striker we have, would rather he played there so Kudus can go back to the wing 
also we’ve got to try Guilherme on the wing, nobody seems to rate him but we’ve got absolutely no pace in this team, even if he’s crap just get him to use his pace and keep things simple 
the likes of Cresswell, Rodriguez and Coufal (I know he hasn’t started him yet) should just flat out never be playing for us against premier league opposition, you’re automatically giving the other team a helping hand 
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Sir Alf »

Fair points Maverick but I suspect Cresswell came in so he could play a back 3 with 2 advanced wing backs to match up with Palace.  He switched Kudus central as we had hoped but tactically went with a “double pivot” of Alvatez and Rodruiguez to limit space for Sarr and Eze and Mateta who like to run onto balls into the channels.  It restricted Palace first half to one clear on target effort from Mateta but completely nullified us in an attacking sense. We couldnt get the ball or break out when we did and Kudus and Paqueta were starved of service.

He got that wrong but then changed things by bringing Soler on and ditching the double pivot. That just saw us concede almost immediately. Unfortunately the high press that got Fulham to make 2 mistakes for 2 goals failed when Soler, Emerson, Alvarez and one other attempted it against Palace, they broke they and in 3 passes to Mateta a goal was scored. Potter said that Soler was feeling a tight hamstring from Tues which was why he didnt start.  

Potter had 2 problems. Conceding “boat loads” of goals and with 3 first choice forwards out, no real recognised outlet.  He tried to start by not conceding but got the balance wrong, tried to adjust it and we conceded. The sending off just killed the game.

Lets see what we do at Villa. If Scarles starts and we go to a back 4 it might help although Alvarez or the U21 rookie will have to play as a CB? Who then plays centre defensive mid.  Got to hope Summerville is back.

in summary, would not selecting Cresswell and Rodruiguez have led to a better result? No one knows. Maybe but maybe not.  I think the wider point is its tough to be too hard on Potter with such limited options. Its not like we had experience and quality on the bench.  

Missing your best forwards 4 if you include Antonio, and inheriting a one paced central midfield and centre back partnership in the absence of Todibo, is a huge millstone to be carrying.  At this early stage ( 3 games ) Im not going to conclude anything. Its what happens next that is more interesting. Will Potter double down on the defence first approach to stpp conceding the goals? Best form of defence is attack was almost impossible yesterday but with Bowen and Summerville returning, thats the time to get a better idea of Potter. He will have proper alternative options.

imho of course 🙂

 
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Maverick180180 »

Completely baffled by what he’s attempting to do,
in the game against Villa he selected the strongest line up he had available to him and despite the loss I could see some light at the end of the tunnel
but now in his next 2 home games he’s gone ultra defensive, we’ve had more injury troubles, but there was absolutely no need play 3 defensive midfielders or bring Cresswell back into the side, Scarles won man of the match against Villa and gets dropped 
Hopefully he realises now that Cresswell & Rodriguez should never be starting, but it continues to worry me that we keep hiring managers who can’t work out the bleeding obvious from the start 
Post Reply