AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 715
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 91 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1058
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 506 times
- Been liked: 481 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
riosleftsock wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.
Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but. It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity. It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.
Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation. I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. 
I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.
We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting.
I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.
We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting.
-
- Posts: 535
- Old WHO Number: 18101
- Has liked: 129 times
- Been liked: 69 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
But wait 113,00 members voted for him.
(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)
-
- Posts: 1773
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 322 times
- Been liked: 103 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.
Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but. It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity. It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.
Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation. I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but. It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity. It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.
Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation. I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
-
- Posts: 488
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 176 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Really? Do go on...riosleftsock wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.
-
- Posts: 2112
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 441 times
- Been liked: 628 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If the Canadian people elect another Trudeau (ie Carney) after everything that was done to the truckers, then they'll deserve all the misery coming their way. Bit like we are with the election of Starmer.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3144
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 684 times
- Been liked: 1037 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I know the people didn't elect him, the people didn't elect Sunak either and he served the same purpose
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It’s the party that elected him, not the people. However at the next Canadian general election, if they did elect a Globalist like Carney, they deserve to be annexed.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3144
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 684 times
- Been liked: 1037 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1279
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 275 times
- Been liked: 605 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 21:10Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!
Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t.
The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.
I don't believe the Mods (on WHO) have taken it down (although can't talk for all). That link (when I look at the code in the post and try it in a browser directly) doesn't work...suspect was taken down on Twitter/X for some reason?!
-
- Posts: 322
- Old WHO Number: 22726
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 68 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
riosleftsock wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.
why is that? both i see it as mutilating an infant, odd that it the religious types that go in for this type of thing, is God's design not perfect?
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1058
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 506 times
- Been liked: 481 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There is no need to circumcise infant boys. It's a disgusting, abusive practice. It's mutilation.
-
- Posts: 1773
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 322 times
- Been liked: 103 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 11:03Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable.I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.
I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
I’m of Ashkenazi heritage. Luckily for me my old dear told the family to hop it when they wanted me and my brother before me to get the chop.
Nobody our side consider themselves Jewish. We’re English/British.
Nobody our side consider themselves Jewish. We’re English/British.
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1058
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 506 times
- Been liked: 481 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable.
I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.
I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
-
- Posts: 1630
- Has liked: 1099 times
- Been liked: 543 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 19:23 "We plan to introduce a mechanism so that by the end of the year every adult male will be trained in case of war," — Polish PM Tusk
LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE, PRIVATE PICKLE!
He'll be leading from the rear .
Stand by your smartphone
Stand by your smartphone
-
- Posts: 1852
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 329 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yes we have plenty of woke here
maybe not as bad as the UK or USA (pre Orange man) but we are getting there 
Victoria and Melbourne got the headlines during COVID for some of the harshest and longest lasting lockdown from their Premier nicknamed “Dictator Dan”, wasn’t as bad here in Sydney, we also watched on in bemusement
Victoria and Melbourne got the headlines during COVID for some of the harshest and longest lasting lockdown from their Premier nicknamed “Dictator Dan”, wasn’t as bad here in Sydney, we also watched on in bemusement
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Sydney - You are forever harping on about how PC and 'big brother' the UK is, but isn't Australia just as bad, if not worse? The way the gov threated the public there during covid was absolutely fucking scandalous.
-
- Posts: 2112
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 441 times
- Been liked: 628 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Syd.
There are plenty of people who insist that P-------i
rape gangs don't exist so ignoring the plight of animal cruelty isn't that much of a stretch.
There are plenty of people who insist that P-------i
rape gangs don't exist so ignoring the plight of animal cruelty isn't that much of a stretch.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 329 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Well the sad thing is, they cant do fuck all
Although animals are required BY LAW to be stunned (so they don't feel the pain) before slaughter in the UK, they do have exceptions!!!! Certain Religions is anyone surprised to learn
.............And i doubt any Politician in the UK would have the balls to try and change this, even though it should be, cries of Islamophobe or antisemite would be screamed.
Disgraceful and unbelievable really
Nation of animal lovers yet the government allow this
Link here
Religious Slaughter - Animal Welfare | RSPCA - RSPCA - rspca.org.uk
Current UK law requires animals to be stunned before slaughter, so they don't feel pain. However, Jewish and Muslim communities aren't required by law to stun animals before slaughter. All Shechita (Jewish) and some Halal (Muslim) slaughter involves cutting the animal's throat without stunning them first.
Although animals are required BY LAW to be stunned (so they don't feel the pain) before slaughter in the UK, they do have exceptions!!!! Certain Religions is anyone surprised to learn
Disgraceful and unbelievable really
Link here
Religious Slaughter - Animal Welfare | RSPCA - RSPCA - rspca.org.uk
Current UK law requires animals to be stunned before slaughter, so they don't feel pain. However, Jewish and Muslim communities aren't required by law to stun animals before slaughter. All Shechita (Jewish) and some Halal (Muslim) slaughter involves cutting the animal's throat without stunning them first.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 00:28Nutsin wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 21:10Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!
Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t.
The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.Curious as to why the MODS, would take it down? This site is pretty much for adults we don't need "protecting" from this type of stuff and given the language and cunting that goes on, seems a tad hypocritical to block it, a video like this doesn't need censorship, a graphic warning i can understand then its your choice to watch or not, if anything shit like this needs calling out, not hidden.
Mind you the way the UK is these days, maybe get a knock on the WHO door and plod saying its Islamophobic or similar nonsense, so maybe the MODS did it for that reason?
Don't particularly want to watch it, cruelty to animals i can't stand, but to pretend it's not happening or making excuses for these savages by taking content like this down only sees it seen as acceptable by the perpetrators of this kind of behavior.
Thats my 2 pence worth, take it or leave it!
Syd, wtf happened to the RSPCA?
-
- Posts: 1852
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 329 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 21:10Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!
Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t.
The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.
Curious as to why the MODS, would take it down? This site is pretty much for adults we don't need "protecting" from this type of stuff and given the language and cunting that goes on, seems a tad hypocritical to block it, a video like this doesn't need censorship, a graphic warning i can understand then its your choice to watch or not, if anything shit like this needs calling out, not hidden.
Mind you the way the UK is these days, maybe get a knock on the WHO door and plod saying its Islamophobic or similar nonsense, so maybe the MODS did it for that reason?
Don't particularly want to watch it, cruelty to animals i can't stand, but to pretend it's not happening or making excuses for these savages by taking content like this down only sees it seen as acceptable by the perpetrators of this kind of behavior.
Thats my 2 pence worth, take it or leave it!
Mind you the way the UK is these days, maybe get a knock on the WHO door and plod saying its Islamophobic or similar nonsense, so maybe the MODS did it for that reason?
Don't particularly want to watch it, cruelty to animals i can't stand, but to pretend it's not happening or making excuses for these savages by taking content like this down only sees it seen as acceptable by the perpetrators of this kind of behavior.
Thats my 2 pence worth, take it or leave it!