Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Manuel »

Sydney_Iron wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 07:24
Manuel wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:51
 
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.
 
Not sure why you would assume any of that? What Trump does will affect all of us, because i have taken early retirement doesn't mean i have some kind of guaranteed pension as i don't. Im also not entitled to a government pension until i reach retirement age and I'm a good few years away from that! and it's not great, like the UK enough to survive on but little else.

The world will get over Trump, unless he really goes rogue and starts wars etc, Stock and Bond markets (that's where I'm invested for income) go up and go down, always have and always will, sometimes its dramatic and people panic and sell at distressed prices, history shows if you ride out these storms your always better off, no point trying to pick tops or bottoms, that's a mugs game and besides im not smart enough😏

We are also a looooooong way off panic mode and TBH even if we get there I'm not sure i will be doing a corporal Jones at any point...........baton down the hatches is more my style and ride it out, mind you one thing markets shocks has taught me is to always sit on enough cash to live on for at least 2 years, that should ride out most storms but no guarantees, but then dividends don't just dry up so not like that pot isn't still getting top ups along the way.
So as I correctly said you are comfortable. Some don't have enough for 2 weeks let alone 2 years plus. Little wonder you find it all so amusing from your ivory tower. Good for you, a bit classless though.
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1694
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Sydney_Iron »

Manuel wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:51
 
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.
 
 
Not sure why you would assume any of that? What Trump does will affect all of us, because i have taken early retirement doesn't mean i have some kind of guaranteed pension as i don't. Im also not entitled to a government pension until i reach retirement age and I'm a good few years away from that! and it's not great, like the UK enough to survive on but little else.

The world will get over Trump, unless he really goes rogue and starts wars etc, Stock and Bond markets (that's where I'm invested for income) go up and go down, always have and always will, sometimes its dramatic and people panic and sell at distressed prices, history shows if you ride out these storms your always better off, no point trying to pick tops or bottoms, that's a mugs game and besides im not smart enough😏

We are also a looooooong way off panic mode and TBH even if we get there I'm not sure i will be doing a corporal Jones at any point...........baton down the hatches is more my style and ride it out, mind you one thing markets shocks has taught me is to always sit on enough cash to live on for at least 2 years, that should ride out most storms but no guarantees, but then dividends don't just dry up so not like that pot isn't still getting top ups along the way.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

It’s all fun and games until you realise he’s knocked 2% off your pension pot.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Manuel »

Sydney_Iron wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:06 Say what you want about the orange man, but he has put the fun back into politics🤣

The football season is fast turning into a bore fest, so each morning i look at the news sites to see what his latest antics, tweets or rants are!😲

Love the way he just doesn't give a fuck, even though i may not agree with everything he's doing, it's certainly a change, couple of Canadian expats i know though who are normally pretty easy going, rational and mild mannered yet just the mention of his name has steam coming out their ears, they hate the cսnt with a passion.....
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1694
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Sydney_Iron »

Say what you want about the orange man, but he has put the fun back into politics🤣

The football season is fast turning into a bore fest, so each morning i look at the news sites to see what his latest antics, tweets or rants are!😲

Love the way he just doesn't give a fuck, even though i may not agree with everything he's doing, it's certainly a change, couple of Canadian expats i know though who are normally pretty easy going, rational and mild mannered yet just the mention of his name has steam coming out their ears, they hate the cսnt with a passion.....
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

If the Trump led peace talks fail it could be Starmer leading the charge to defend Europe from Putin.

You ready?
ironsofcanada
Posts: 526
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 124 times
Been liked: 68 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

Sydney_Iron wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 19:40

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor🤣
There is no such thing as a popular vote for leader in our (collective) system. 

Unfortunately, while we should be focused on why we are so dependant on the States economically, why we have a Chinese infiltration problem (that includes fentanyl), and why we generally becoming less and less free, we are instead fighting who can be most against States.

China just slapped tariffs on us but they are smart enough, I guess, not to make a big deal of it.  Or they smartly know Trump makes himself the shiney object and we are stupid enough to be completely distracted. 
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1694
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Sydney_Iron »

ironsofcanada wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 14:08
Takashi Miike" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
But wait 113,00 members voted for him.


(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)
Yeah but its not like this new bloke has won the popular vote, its Trudeau and his party choosing a new leader, so was always going to be someone of this ilk, don't you have elections that need to be had before the end of the year? See what the average Canadian thinks of him then i suppose!

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor🤣
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 630
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 146 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

Nursie,

Personally, as a proud cavalier with impeccable personal hygiene, and you will know better than me, but aren't some uncircumcised chaps occasionally a bit whiff down there?
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 985
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 422 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 16:31
riosleftsock wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.  😉

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 
 
Nurse, I had it done for medical reasons, I'm now a proud roundhead.

Yes it hurt like a cսnt, I had to pull my own stitches out, I wouldn't let anyone else near it.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

riosleftsock wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.  😉

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 
ironsofcanada
Posts: 526
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 124 times
Been liked: 68 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

Takashi Miike wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
But wait 113,00 members voted for him.


(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post riosleftsock »

I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Council Scum
Posts: 427
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 141 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Council Scum »

riosleftsock wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  
Really? Do go on...
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

If the Canadian people elect another Trudeau (ie Carney) after everything that was done to the truckers, then they'll deserve all the misery coming their way. Bit like we are with the election of Starmer.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

I know the people didn't elect him, the people didn't elect Sunak either and he served the same purpose
Pub Bigot
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 486 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
It’s the party that elected him, not the people. However at the next Canadian general election, if they did elect a Globalist like Carney, they deserve to be annexed. 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post stubbo-admin »

Nutsin wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 21:10
mallard wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 20:43
Nutsin wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 19:42 Here you go, watch this!



This is progress!
 

Doesn’t look like that link has made much progress 
Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!

Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t. 

The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.
I don't believe the Mods (on WHO) have taken it down (although can't talk for all). That link (when I look at the code in the post and try it in a browser directly) doesn't work...suspect was taken down on Twitter/X for some reason?!
Hammer I am
Posts: 281
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 68 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

riosleftsock wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  
why is that? both i see it as mutilating an infant, odd that it the religious types that go in for this type of thing, is God's design not perfect?
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

There is no need to circumcise infant boys. It's a disgusting, abusive practice. It's mutilation. 
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post riosleftsock »

Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

What is going on in Romania? Aren’t they a member of the EU? The liberals will do whatever it takes to maintain a hold of power in the EU.

unreal!
Pub Bigot
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 486 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 11:03
Pub Bigot" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 
I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.

I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
I’m of Ashkenazi heritage. Luckily for me my old dear told the family to hop it when they wanted me and my brother before me to get the chop. 

Nobody our side consider themselves Jewish. We’re English/British. 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Pub Bigot" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 
I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.

I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
Post Reply