Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Max Kilman

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Eerie Decent
Posts: 415
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 164 times

Kilman Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

This lad is a real problem.

At £40mil, it's getting to the point of worst ever signing territory. The worst crime in football is hiding, centre back is probably the one position you can half get away with it, but not for too long. Shirks taking responsibility, who imo makes him worse than Mavropanos, at least he fronts up, which can lead to mistakes. Kilman doesn't, so it doesn't get highlighted.

We've obviously got a massive overhaul in the summer, but for me, he is the biggest problem in our team and we need to cut our losses if we can. It took a while to spot, because he hides, but you can't fool people for too long. Wolves fans told us, some wouldn't have it, but they were dead right. Absolute fraud of a player.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 415
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

There's  barely a fag paper between Aguerd and Kilman, both nowhere near good enough. 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 985
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 422 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Far Cough UKunt »

I'd rather have the cat kicker with his dodgy knees than either Mavropanos or Kilman and get Aguerd back as well.

Good God we have some fucking shit in this squad, more than I can think of any squad in the past.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post southbankbornnbred »

He’s not the worst player in the squad - not by any means. But he’s a poor, slow player (like many in this squad) and worth nowhere near £40m.

Hes a bottom half of the Prem/Championship player. And for that money you have to expect a lot better.

He is a massive problem, though, because he’s not even a year into a massive seven-year deal. He won’t want to go anywhere else: he’s made for life at West Ham.

Lopetegui should have been sacked for that deal alone.

 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 415
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 May 2025, 03:17
nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
My feeling is yes. His confidence is shot to bits this season and isn't doing himself justice at all. That doesn't excuse his woeful performances or indeed  his unforced error like today and called for him to be dropped myself before Brighton. I do however think he can come good should we get the right manager in to sort his head out. But he isn't currently proving he's worth £4 let alone £40M which seems to weigh heavily around his neck which he didn't have to play under that level of expectation before coming here and he's struggled with it.
He had one game in particular where he was absolutely brilliant. Any player in the Premier League can have that sort of performance as a one off.

However, you cannot be as shit as he has been, for such a long period of time, and blame it on everything else other than him.

Importantly though, if you read the thread, I've said it already, the most worrying thing about it is this is exactly the player most Wolves fans said we were getting. Slow, doesn't talk, no leadership, makes mistakes. So either they are wrong, most of us are wrong, and we can make loads of excuses for him being shit. Just like some are doing for Potter.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3967
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Sullivan kippered again with this transfer.

He won't learn though - he's got a degree and done all the learning he needs.

Who's his next target?
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3085
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
 
 
The same people lauding him as and excellent signing were probably the same ones who laughably thought we won the transfer window last summer. 

These are probably the same people who thinks there's a decent player in Kilman and he just needs better players around him 

They're wrong. He's just shit.
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post onsideman »

You get the slower centre backs who position themselves well, command both areas, compete for every cross, corner or free kick, block everything and generally make life really difficult for opposing centre forwards as well as being a threat in the opposition box. Most recently, for us, that would be Craig Dawson.

Then you get the quicker, footballing centre backs. The ones who can really play, with confidence and composure, and who's ability to cover ground rapidly compensates for any positioning shortfalls.

Then you get Max Kilman
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3355
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Massive Attack »

nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
My feeling is yes. His confidence is shot to bits this season and isn't doing himself justice at all. That doesn't excuse his woeful performances or indeed  his unforced error like today and called for him to be dropped myself before Brighton. I do however think he can come good should we get the right manager in to sort his head out. But he isn't currently proving he's worth £4 let alone £40M which seems to weigh heavily around his neck which he didn't have to play under that level of expectation before coming here and he's struggled with it.
nychammer
Posts: 1411
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post nychammer »

Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Sir Alf »

Casey Ive watched a few times for the yoofs, U21s and he just seems too lightweight. Maybe he can fill out and develop but seems a way off Premier Lge just now. Rice was exceptional at 18/19 years old and no one has come close to that since. A “once in a generation” talent probably.  

Potts and Earthy seem closest and then I suppose Marshall. Guilherme also in this category.  Then we start to think of the next lot which is Orford.  But even Potts and Earthy, Premier League? Hopefully but need to develop a lot more. Again, physicality the biggest issue Imo but they have time. Fingers crossed.   

 
eusebiovic
Posts: 179
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 61 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post eusebiovic »

Surely Kaelan Casey can't be any worse than this fella.

He might make a mistake or two but at least he is young enough to learn from them like Rice did. 
Percy Dalton
Posts: 333
Old WHO Number: 276654
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Percy Dalton »

We just haven't got a spine.
Starting with Areola he's a glorified shot stopper who has zilch distribution skills.
Kilman is a championship player at best and we haven't had a decent striker for two years at least.
Continue that scenario next season and it's bye bye Premier league 
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Sir Alf »

Yet again we buy a bloke who is too slow.  At £40 million, and his wages, yet another financial and footballing disaster in a 15 year catalog of disasterous transfer dealings. Our recruitment is not even “scatter gun” as that would assume its aimed in above both feet.  No joined up thinking or plan whatsoever reflecting the intelligence and thinking of our narcissistic owner.  
honky cat
Posts: 509
Has liked: 298 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post honky cat »

Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 04 May 2025, 17:00
People didn't want Harry Maguire but this fella makes him look like a Rolls Royce even now.



 
 
 
Some of it was that he didn't want to join us, as he was on too much wedge at Man Utd and didn't fancy London. But there is far too much value placed on the opinion of these YouTubers and Twitter lot. Same with McTominay, not wanted. They were probably just what we needed this season. 

Perhaps the next manager will improve Kilman . . .or the manager after that 
LeroysBoots
Posts: 435
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post LeroysBoots »

He's fucking rubbish, a liability every game
Eerie Decent
Posts: 415
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

As I said, he's our biggest problem,  because of the money paid, meaning we can't really sell him as we'd be at too much of a loss given no one would spend more than £10mil on the bloke. 

He's a guaranteed starter under Plodder,  so look forward to more of the same next season. 

London Derby, against bitter rivals, his team in awful form, and he does that 10 minutes into the game. For all the fancy new tactics, progressive carries, pivots and all that bollocks, the most important thing for a defender in those circumstances,  clear the fucking ball out of fucking danger. Absolute amateur hour.
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 752
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gary Strodders shank »

At fault for the goal and lost the ball trying to bring it out of defence.

Cumbersome slow of pace with no apparent footballing brain or sense of awareness when being closed down.

He doesn't show any leadership qualities either

I can't think of any worse signings in the modern era based on the fee paid and a total lack of apparent ability.

The ageing Cresswell the only talker at the back

People didn't want Harry Maguire but this fella makes him look like a Rolls Royce even now.

 
Gank
Posts: 714
Has liked: 457 times
Been liked: 396 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gank »

According to this article, Max Kilman is "the best defender in the Premier League. Bar none."

https://www.hammers.news/news/david-sul ... s-stunned/

However, this is the same article that starts by saying that only three players can finish the season with their heads held high then names five.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post fraser »

You have to laugh at that mong twoleftfeet who spends every game on who telling someone who has been to more games than he ever has "bye then" especially when he was demanding we sell every single player Saturday... What a sad existence he leads spending his whole life on who pretending to be the biggest West Ham fan ever. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3085
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

Is your favourite colour BEIGE, twoleftfeet?
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post twoleftfeet »

WHUDeano wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 20:52 He is useless. Not Gary Breen useless, but Breen was a free and Kilman was £40m, yet they are comparable….

Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m. Sullivans tenure has reached bottom of barrel level. Beyond it perhaps. The constant swinging between poorly chosen foreigner to boring Brit, the wrong signings, to now the 7 year contracts to absolute shite.  I won’t mention the stadium.

Us as fans & Sullivan as an owner deserve a defensive partnership
of Mavropanos & Kilman. We deserve a poor man’s Gareth Southgate as a manger. We deserve everything we’re getting because we’ve stood back and accepted it all. I’m bored and fed up with it all and by a long way, this is the closest I’ve been to taking a step back and not bothering anymore. 
Bye then 👋
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post southbankbornnbred »

“Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m.”

Absolutely sums it up.

I’m not going rip Kilman’s character - he’s actually a decent fella and he battles hard. But he’s just a low-quality Premier League player. Worth nothing like £40m.

I also don’t blame him for signing. If somebody offered me a seven-year contract on the sort of money a £40m signing gets, then I’d bite their arm off. He knows his talent, and this one deal makes him very wealthy for life.

The people involved in that transfer should be shot (metaphorically). Lopetegui, Sullivan, Steidten (he’s not excused just because Lope chose Kilman: he still had input) and any agents involved. Fucking amateurs.
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1414
Has liked: 967 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

For the outlay.. this bloke has been a massive fail.

He's in good company though

BUT HAVE NO FEAR .
BARONESS BRADY  IS IN DA HOOSE

 
WHUDeano
Posts: 76
Old WHO Number: 17551
Been liked: 43 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post WHUDeano »

He is useless. Not Gary Breen useless, but Breen was a free and Kilman was £40m, yet they are comparable….

Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m. Sullivans tenure has reached bottom of barrel level. Beyond it perhaps. The constant swinging between poorly chosen foreigner to boring Brit, the wrong signings, to now the 7 year contracts to absolute shite.  I won’t mention the stadium.

Us as fans & Sullivan as an owner deserve a defensive partnership
of Mavropanos & Kilman. We deserve a poor man’s Gareth Southgate as a manger. We deserve everything we’re getting because we’ve stood back and accepted it all. I’m bored and fed up with it all and by a long way, this is the closest I’ve been to taking a step back and not bothering anymore. 
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2480
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post easthammer »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 17:24
easthammer wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 16:58  He needs a partner to complement the way he plays.


 
That was a good post until you got to this bit.  ;-)
Sorry, Lee, but I can't work out what was wrong with this bit?
At first I thought I might have misspelt complement. But I hadn't.

Mind you if I had suggested he needed a partner for a compliment.
Maybe it should be "Ooh Max what a tackle"😄
Post Reply