Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Max Kilman

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Eerie Decent
Posts: 956
Has liked: 144 times
Been liked: 412 times

Kilman Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

This lad is a real problem.

At £40mil, it's getting to the point of worst ever signing territory. The worst crime in football is hiding, centre back is probably the one position you can half get away with it, but not for too long. Shirks taking responsibility, who imo makes him worse than Mavropanos, at least he fronts up, which can lead to mistakes. Kilman doesn't, so it doesn't get highlighted.

We've obviously got a massive overhaul in the summer, but for me, he is the biggest problem in our team and we need to cut our losses if we can. It took a while to spot, because he hides, but you can't fool people for too long. Wolves fans told us, some wouldn't have it, but they were dead right. Absolute fraud of a player.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 956
Has liked: 144 times
Been liked: 412 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

Obviously we would all drive him there because we watch him every week, but how the mighty have fallen, with the press linking our 1st team regulars to Crystal fucking Palace.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1563
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 629 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Far Cough UKunt »

I'm volunteering to drive Kilman to Palace.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3456
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 881 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post El Scorchio »

First one mainly seen as Sullivan obstinately wanted Lop so it probably would have been a bit of a fuck you to Stiedten- worked out well eh. Unless he also happened to have a ‘friendly’ agent. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4730
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 590 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Mike Oxsaw »

I still can't make any sense of Sullivan sanctioning this transfer under such ludicrous terms unless:
  1. It was a non-negotiable condition of Loopy-Lou signing, or,
  2. It involves well stuffed, tax-evading brown envelopes discretely hidden behind the left luggage lockers at Victoria coach station on a regular basis, or,
  3. All of the above.
From a football perspective, it's clearly absolute pants.
honky cat
Posts: 1064
Has liked: 609 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post honky cat »

You know he'll go there and be amazing.
It's the west ham way.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3761
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 723 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

Could be the best transfer we could ever make if we somehow get him off the books.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3456
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 881 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post El Scorchio »

From the BBC. 

Crystal Palace have identified West Ham United defender Max Kilman, 28, as a potential replacement for Marc Guehi should the England centre-back leave in the January transfer window. (Football Insider)

Interesting…
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3456
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 881 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post El Scorchio »

Shockingly I think Cresswell was our best CB on Sunday. Absolutely damning on the others to say that. Genuinely think he'll stick just because we'll need him such is our ridiculous situation at the back, and he's a leader/high character guy. And yes, YES it does indicate horribly so that we've been utter utter dogshit in the transfer market and at centre back for far too long, for Cresswell to even be in the manager's thoughts to start a match there at this point in time let alone arguably better out of position than 60 million quids worth of centre back both the best part of ten years younger than him. Any normal club would be saying goodbye and thanks for being such a great servant, but we'll be keeping him.
eusebiovic
Posts: 398
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 735 times
Been liked: 147 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post eusebiovic »

A shocking deal. He wasn't worth more than £20Million which is the going rate these days for a bang average lumbering oaf. 

The diminutive one got his aris turned inside out like a sausage casing yet again 
Pshyco scored all 4
Posts: 261
Has liked: 326 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Pshyco scored all 4 »

The most angry I've ever seen kilman . Was after his headed goal against us was disallowed.  Playing for wolves.  Last season. 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 956
Has liked: 144 times
Been liked: 412 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

Todibo hasn't impressed at all, but we could definitely still get a decent fee for him, based on reputation. 

No-one else would be stupid enough to pay a half decent fee for Kilman. Were lumbered.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3761
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 723 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

Sir Alf" wrote: 06 May 2025, 16:45 We paid double what Kilman was worth simple as that. Not Kilman's fault mind.

Got to be honest, Todibo did not exactly inspire confidence either on Saturday.  He was supposedly brought for his ability on the ball, to bring it out of defence and having a bit of pace.   Didn't see too much of that although he was a calming influence at times.  Just his pace, he got done several times by that Tel bloke after having a head start. That said, he seemed to visibly slow as the game progressed?  Has he still got a fitness issue in terms of strength and stamina?  Also, he seems a bit lightweight at times?   Im hoping it was just an off day. Lets see how he does remainder of the season.  

What's clear is we need a leader at the back in the form of another CB. The difference Cresswell made with simply barking out instructions of when to get out, when to press, when to cover was a major improvement.  But at 35, we cannot be relying on him next season. THat said, might be tempted to give him a 1 year deal just to ensure there is someone in the squad with a voice.
Giving Cresswell another year's contract is a sign we've failed in the transfer window.  We shouldn't be employing anyone just because they can shout.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2600
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Sir Alf »

We paid double what Kilman was worth simple as that. Not Kilman's fault mind.

Got to be honest, Todibo did not exactly inspire confidence either on Saturday.  He was supposedly brought for his ability on the ball, to bring it out of defence and having a bit of pace.   Didn't see too much of that although he was a calming influence at times.  Just his pace, he got done several times by that Tel bloke after having a head start. That said, he seemed to visibly slow as the game progressed?  Has he still got a fitness issue in terms of strength and stamina?  Also, he seems a bit lightweight at times?   Im hoping it was just an off day. Lets see how he does remainder of the season.  

What's clear is we need a leader at the back in the form of another CB. The difference Cresswell made with simply barking out instructions of when to get out, when to press, when to cover was a major improvement.  But at 35, we cannot be relying on him next season. THat said, might be tempted to give him a 1 year deal just to ensure there is someone in the squad with a voice.
nychammer
Posts: 1698
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 214 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post nychammer »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 06 May 2025, 14:41
Rossal wrote: 06 May 2025, 14:24 So we're looking at taking a £20m hit on a player after a year and also paying up 6 years of his contract. We're crying that we are skint already without doing a deal as bad as that. 

He will also need replacing which would eat into even more of the funds we have



 
I doubt he'd be too difficult to replace.  I'm with El Scorch.  We can't have him sitting on the bench taking up wages.  We've had that for the past 2 years with Ings and it hasn't served us well.

I'd take whatever hit we can and move on.  I've seen way too many excuses for him by now.  He isn't good enough.
God when you think about the mediocre players we’ve bought in over recent years and just paid them to warm the bench. It’s really ludicrous in some cases and it’s become an expensive  destructive habit. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3761
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 723 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 06 May 2025, 16:01 The maddest bit of all this, is we paid absolutely top tier money for him, because we were in a bidding war with...

Absolutely nobody.

Fucking hell.
He DOUBLED his salary as well, joining us.

Pants pulled right down and buggered.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 956
Has liked: 144 times
Been liked: 412 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

The maddest bit of all this, is we paid absolutely top tier money for him, because we were in a bidding war with...

Absolutely nobody.

Fucking hell.
Lato
Posts: 279
Old WHO Number: 14079
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 30 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lato »

Such a school boy error for the Totspurs goal. When I was a kid I was told launch it in to row z. Not exactly the West Ham way I know, but effective!
Rossal
Posts: 740
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 85 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Rossal »

its better to be paying someone to be here than be paying them silly money to not be.  We see start of the season he is capable of some great performances so lets hope and pray he can get back to those levels. Having him as a third choice is no bad thing if we resort back to a back 4. 

Hopefully the clear out and Potter having a full pre season can raise the standards again. 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 956
Has liked: 144 times
Been liked: 412 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »

This is exactly why, as I stated in my original post, he is the biggest problem. Although the nuance behind that was too much for some to understand. 

We either take a massive hit on him, or we have a £40mil player on huge wages on the bench,  because you can't go into a season with him as a first choice. No way.

Huge, huge problem. The lad is awful, sad but we were warned.
Rossal
Posts: 740
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 85 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Rossal »

We just aren't in a situation on or off the pitch to take such a hit. Potter firing a rocket up him during pre season is our best bet 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3761
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 723 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Lee Trundle »

Rossal wrote: 06 May 2025, 14:24 So we're looking at taking a £20m hit on a player after a year and also paying up 6 years of his contract. We're crying that we are skint already without doing a deal as bad as that. 

He will also need replacing which would eat into even more of the funds we have


 
I doubt he'd be too difficult to replace.  I'm with El Scorch.  We can't have him sitting on the bench taking up wages.  We've had that for the past 2 years with Ings and it hasn't served us well.

I'd take whatever hit we can and move on.  I've seen way too many excuses for him by now.  He isn't good enough.
Gank
Posts: 1043
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 591 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gank »

Rossal wrote: 06 May 2025, 14:24 So we're looking at taking a £20m hit on a player after a year and also paying up 6 years of his contract. We're crying that we are skint already without doing a deal as bad as that. 

He will also need replacing which would eat into even more of the funds we have


 
The maths just doesn't work out. We're going to have to keep him, maybe Potter and his team can get him playing a bit better, a bit more consistently from the new season but if he stays the same he'll be the best paid substitute we've ever had, knocking Javier Mascherano into second place.
Rossal
Posts: 740
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 85 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Rossal »

So we're looking at taking a £20m hit on a player after a year and also paying up 6 years of his contract. We're crying that we are skint already without doing a deal as bad as that. 

He will also need replacing which would eat into even more of the funds we have

 
Gank
Posts: 1043
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 591 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gank »

I don't know if there are any top division clubs well within their PSR parameters, but if there is,they can afford 5.2 million per year in his wages over 6 years making him worth 31 million quid so we would struggle to shift him on a free transfer at that valuation.
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 894
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gary Strodders shank »

Maidenhead s £4m windfall from the Kilman deal didn't do them much good as they have been relegated from the national league.

Alan Devonshire's first relegation as a manager.

Daggers also gone

 
Post Reply