AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 718
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 92 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:47 Here you go British- Pakistani according to the left wing BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65174096.amp
Think that means Muslim!
Of course it means Muslim, but funnily enough ‘Muslim’ isn’t a country. Nobody migrates from ‘Muslim’.
they’re British citizens born here but with Pakistani heritage. As Billy pointed out to you, you cannot deport British citizens.
so what’s your plan? Deport all Muslims?
they’re British citizens born here but with Pakistani heritage. As Billy pointed out to you, you cannot deport British citizens.
so what’s your plan? Deport all Muslims?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Here you go British- Pakistani according to the left wing BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65174096.amp
Think that means Muslim!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65174096.amp
Think that means Muslim!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:43I don’t how else to tell you that the people who did it were almost exclusively British citizens born in Britain.
Bollocks majority are Pakistani. And Muslim.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:40Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:37 If you can’t judge a country by the way its citizens treat its kids then why bother. The grooming Gangs are a pathetic stain on Britain’s police, Gov’t and more importantly its pathetic immigration policy.
Grooming kids stems from Islam and the 3rd world it’s undeniable.The US also has higher rates of child poverty.
More violence and more child poverty. Why chose to live in such a 3rd world shit hole?
Groomer, Yeah kiddy smuggling and the sex slave trade was allowed to pour in over the Mexican border under Biden, 300,000 kids unaccounted for. Trumps cleaning it up as we speak, Only Trumps not fucking around. Bet it gets cleared up much quicker here than there.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:40goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:36Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:34It’s 3rd world savages grooming innocent young children and mass raping them. As pure a sign of 3rd world as you will find anywhere on the planet, How can you possibly say that it isn’t.
It’s symbolic of what happens to kids and women in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
So it is a clear example of Britain turning into a 3rd world shit hole, in fact the worst possible example of 3rd world savagery.
Those savages are British citizens who are now in prison.
The country you live in has much higher rates of murder & violence. You live in a more savage country, does that make it 3rd world? Or is it purely based on skin colour?Admit it the Grooming Gangs are an immigrant problem ffs. We never had grooming Gangs before. It’s only since the 3rd world arrived that it started happening and because of cover ups and pandering to these savage groups it’s exploded.
I don’t how else to tell you that the people who did it were almost exclusively British citizens born in Britain.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:36Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:34goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:27Starmers reluctance to prosecute?
There was an enquiry, it uncovered all the police failings and uncovered multiple more victims.
It also put in place measures to stop it happening again.
back to the actual point of this, despite the scale of the scandal it doesn’t put any U.K. city anywhere near the worst in the world for sex crimes. There are still US cities with higher sex crime rates and violent crime rates. Does that make them 3rd world cities?It’s 3rd world savages grooming innocent young children and mass raping them. As pure a sign of 3rd world as you will find anywhere on the planet, How can you possibly say that it isn’t.
It’s symbolic of what happens to kids and women in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
So it is a clear example of Britain turning into a 3rd world shit hole, in fact the worst possible example of 3rd world savagery.
Those savages are British citizens who are now in prison.
The country you live in has much higher rates of murder & violence. You live in a more savage country, does that make it 3rd world? Or is it purely based on skin colour?
Admit it the Grooming Gangs are an immigrant problem ffs. We never had grooming Gangs before. It’s only since the 3rd world arrived that it started happening and because of cover ups and pandering to these savage groups it’s exploded.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:37 If you can’t judge a country by the way its citizens treat its kids then why bother. The grooming Gangs are a pathetic stain on Britain’s police, Gov’t and more importantly its pathetic immigration policy.
Grooming kids stems from Islam and the 3rd world it’s undeniable.
The US also has higher rates of child poverty.
More violence and more child poverty. Why chose to live in such a 3rd world shit hole?
More violence and more child poverty. Why chose to live in such a 3rd world shit hole?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If you can’t judge a country by the way its citizens treat its kids then why bother. The grooming Gangs are a pathetic stain on Britain’s police, Gov’t and more importantly its pathetic immigration policy.
Grooming kids stems from Islam and the 3rd world it’s undeniable.
Grooming kids stems from Islam and the 3rd world it’s undeniable.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:34goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:27Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:20Yes groomer, I think Starmers reluctance to prosecute is. And yes can’t think why they wouldn’t want a full on inquiry in light of the police cover ups. What are they worried about? Get it all out there the public has a right to now.
So we can now agree that you DON’T know how many rape victims there are/were.Starmers reluctance to prosecute?
There was an enquiry, it uncovered all the police failings and uncovered multiple more victims.
It also put in place measures to stop it happening again.
back to the actual point of this, despite the scale of the scandal it doesn’t put any U.K. city anywhere near the worst in the world for sex crimes. There are still US cities with higher sex crime rates and violent crime rates. Does that make them 3rd world cities?It’s 3rd world savages grooming innocent young children and mass raping them. As pure a sign of 3rd world as you will find anywhere on the planet, How can you possibly say that it isn’t.
It’s symbolic of what happens to kids and women in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
So it is a clear example of Britain turning into a 3rd world shit hole, in fact the worst possible example of 3rd world savagery.
Those savages are British citizens who are now in prison.
The country you live in has much higher rates of murder & violence. You live in a more savage country, does that make it 3rd world? Or is it purely based on skin colour?
The country you live in has much higher rates of murder & violence. You live in a more savage country, does that make it 3rd world? Or is it purely based on skin colour?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:27Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:20Yes groomer, I think Starmers reluctance to prosecute is. And yes can’t think why they wouldn’t want a full on inquiry in light of the police cover ups. What are they worried about? Get it all out there the public has a right to now.
So we can now agree that you DON’T know how many rape victims there are/were.Starmers reluctance to prosecute?
There was an enquiry, it uncovered all the police failings and uncovered multiple more victims.
It also put in place measures to stop it happening again.
back to the actual point of this, despite the scale of the scandal it doesn’t put any U.K. city anywhere near the worst in the world for sex crimes. There are still US cities with higher sex crime rates and violent crime rates. Does that make them 3rd world cities?
It’s 3rd world savages grooming innocent young children and mass raping them. As pure a sign of 3rd world as you will find anywhere on the planet, How can you possibly say that it isn’t.
It’s symbolic of what happens to kids and women in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
So it is a clear example of Britain turning into a 3rd world shit hole, in fact the worst possible example of 3rd world savagery.
It’s symbolic of what happens to kids and women in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
So it is a clear example of Britain turning into a 3rd world shit hole, in fact the worst possible example of 3rd world savagery.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:20Yes groomer, I think Starmers reluctance to prosecute is. And yes can’t think why they wouldn’t want a full on inquiry in light of the police cover ups. What are they worried about? Get it all out there the public has a right to now.
So we can now agree that you DON’T know how many rape victims there are/were.
Starmers reluctance to prosecute?
There was an enquiry, it uncovered all the police failings and uncovered multiple more victims.
It also put in place measures to stop it happening again.
back to the actual point of this, despite the scale of the scandal it doesn’t put any U.K. city anywhere near the worst in the world for sex crimes. There are still US cities with higher sex crime rates and violent crime rates. Does that make them 3rd world cities?
There was an enquiry, it uncovered all the police failings and uncovered multiple more victims.
It also put in place measures to stop it happening again.
back to the actual point of this, despite the scale of the scandal it doesn’t put any U.K. city anywhere near the worst in the world for sex crimes. There are still US cities with higher sex crime rates and violent crime rates. Does that make them 3rd world cities?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yes groomer, I think Starmers reluctance to prosecute is. And yes can’t think why they wouldn’t want a full on inquiry in light of the police cover ups. What are they worried about? Get it all out there the public has a right to now.
So we can now agree that you DON’T know how many rape victims there are/were.
So we can now agree that you DON’T know how many rape victims there are/were.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 21:00goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:53Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:52 Here you go groomer, here’s another article.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o.ampBrilliant.
a democratically elected house has a democratic vote.
i thought it was a 3rd world country?But Groomer, I thought there was no Gov’t cover up?
You think having a public debate followed by a democratic vote which is widely reported is a cover up?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:53Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:52 Here you go groomer, here’s another article.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o.ampBrilliant.
a democratically elected house has a democratic vote.
i thought it was a 3rd world country?
But Groomer, I thought there was no Gov’t cover up?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Trump has brought in the National guard to keep Antifa and the left wing disruptors in check.
He has stated that people can peacefully protest but any rioting and criminal damage and they will get hit with the full force of the law. Also protestors are no longer allowed to wear masks. That’ll stop some and make it easier to identify the criminals.
More common sense from the Donald!
Well done there!
He has stated that people can peacefully protest but any rioting and criminal damage and they will get hit with the full force of the law. Also protestors are no longer allowed to wear masks. That’ll stop some and make it easier to identify the criminals.
More common sense from the Donald!
Well done there!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:52 Here you go groomer, here’s another article.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o.amp
Brilliant.
a democratically elected house has a democratic vote.
i thought it was a 3rd world country?
a democratically elected house has a democratic vote.
i thought it was a 3rd world country?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:50goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:47Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:40 Here’s an article on Starmer and his failings on prosecuting the grooming gangs ffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo.ampYou’ve not read the article have you?It’s hardly what you’d call transparency is it?
Ill
repeat
my question how do you know how many grooming gangs rape cases there are considering the lack of transparency the lack of prosecutions, police cover ups etc:
Answer the fucking question you groomer!
Police cover up? I thought they were government cover ups?
You posted an article blaming Starmer but the article actually defends his record of prosecuting them.
You posted an article blaming Starmer but the article actually defends his record of prosecuting them.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:47Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:40 Here’s an article on Starmer and his failings on prosecuting the grooming gangs ffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo.ampYou’ve not read the article have you?
It’s hardly what you’d call transparency is it?
Ill
repeat
my question how do you know how many grooming gangs rape cases there are considering the lack of transparency the lack of prosecutions, police cover ups etc:
Answer the fucking question you groomer!
Ill
repeat
my question how do you know how many grooming gangs rape cases there are considering the lack of transparency the lack of prosecutions, police cover ups etc:
Answer the fucking question you groomer!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:40 Here’s an article on Starmer and his failings on prosecuting the grooming gangs ffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo.amp
You’ve not read the article have you?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:43goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:39Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:31Yeah that’s why the British Gov’t banned Tommy Robinson tell all documentary then threw him jail for airing it. Sure no cover ups here.
Even the liberal networks have reported the police cover ups in Rochdale for example, are you really that uninformed?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-man ... 967919.ampI think you might need to learn the difference between a police cover up and a GOVERNMENT one.
like I said, absolutely clueless. You just blunder from one inaccuracy to another. It’s laughable.And there’s
more silly nuts!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... gangs-pmqs
What were you saying about GOVERNMENT?
Such a retard!
I’ve said it before, but you cannot be this stupid, it’s not possible surely??
not having a public enquiry is not covering up crimes. The people who committed those crimes are behind bars. Starmer was in some way responsible for prosecuting them.
not having a public enquiry is not covering up crimes. The people who committed those crimes are behind bars. Starmer was in some way responsible for prosecuting them.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:39Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:31Yeah that’s why the British Gov’t banned Tommy Robinson tell all documentary then threw him jail for airing it. Sure no cover ups here.
Even the liberal networks have reported the police cover ups in Rochdale for example, are you really that uninformed?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-man ... 967919.ampI think you might need to learn the difference between a police cover up and a GOVERNMENT one.
like I said, absolutely clueless. You just blunder from one inaccuracy to another. It’s laughable.
And there’s
more silly nuts!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... gangs-pmqs
What were you saying about GOVERNMENT?
Such a retard!
more silly nuts!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... gangs-pmqs
What were you saying about GOVERNMENT?
Such a retard!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Here’s an article on Starmer and his failings on prosecuting the grooming gangs ffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo.amp
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo.amp
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:31goose wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:25Nutsin wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025, 20:18How do you know the numbers of rape victims your Gov’t hides them from you.
But what is u deniable is the culprits of the grooming gangs are Muslim.
There was no such thing as a grooming gang when I lived there. Fucking let the 3rd world in and you become 3rd world.Which reported crimes are being hidden? Why do you keep making this shit up?
The government haven’t hidden anything.
what’s also undeniable is that the culprits were British citizens.
Is your solution to deport all Muslims?Yeah that’s why the British Gov’t banned Tommy Robinson tell all documentary then threw him jail for airing it. Sure no cover ups here.
Even the liberal networks have reported the police cover ups in Rochdale for example, are you really that uninformed?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-man ... 967919.amp
I think you might need to learn the difference between a police cover up and a GOVERNMENT one.
like I said, absolutely clueless. You just blunder from one inaccuracy to another. It’s laughable.
TRs ‘documentary’ is widely available to watch, I’ve seen it. Nobody has banned anything. Not like you to get details completely wrong again.
like I said, absolutely clueless. You just blunder from one inaccuracy to another. It’s laughable.
TRs ‘documentary’ is widely available to watch, I’ve seen it. Nobody has banned anything. Not like you to get details completely wrong again.
Last edited by goose on 08 Jun 2025, 20:43, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Here you go
https://www.yahoo.com/news/grooming-gan ... 00347.html
How many more times do I have to prove you wrong for you to understand. I’m starting to think you’re in a grooming gang ffs.
Unbelievable how hard you are trying to paint a false narrative.
Nobody is that pig ignorant.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/grooming-gan ... 00347.html
How many more times do I have to prove you wrong for you to understand. I’m starting to think you’re in a grooming gang ffs.
Unbelievable how hard you are trying to paint a false narrative.
Nobody is that pig ignorant.