AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Iran v Israel
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Iran v Israel
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3969
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 395 times
Re: Iran v Israel
With regard to Iran's potential to develop nuclear weapons and it's attitude towards Israel, is "Let's just wait and see what happens," a sensible, adult, intelligent and responsible stance to take?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3357
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑14 Jun 2025, 22:52 I find it ironic that those on the far-left denouncing Israel as war mongers and aggressors for these TARGETED strikes by saying Iran has the right to defend itself and is the "victim" blah blah blah, don't say a dicky bird about Iran responding by firing indiscriminately into Israel or targeting areas of high civilian population?
Also, that these Ayatollahs should they have their way would target and get rid of any purple haired, pronoun wearing, rainbow flag waiving, LGBTQI, DEI supporter and they would really find out the meaning of "victim" or of being discriminated against![]()
Don't worry, the Egyptians are currently giving all the do-gooders a proper hiding for encouraging and facilitating the agitators of hate in the region by attempting to 'march to Gaza', whatever that means..
Irony at it's best.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3357
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
All propped up and inspired by the Religion of Peace....
Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Pakistan, Saudis, Afghanistan, they're all Islamic obsessed destructive shitholes. Level the fucking lot, if I had it my way.
Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Pakistan, Saudis, Afghanistan, they're all Islamic obsessed destructive shitholes. Level the fucking lot, if I had it my way.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑15 Jun 2025, 02:29Exactly, contracts are signed, weapons supplied, us Brits have supplied to some pretty dodgy regimes over the years as well lets not forget! And as soon as the conflict broke out most of those contracts would have been paused if from allies of the UK but pretty hard to stop the use of weapons already there or en route.
These Ayatollahs are a different ball game though, should they develop a nuclear weapons they will hold the middle east if not the world to ransom and seeing their love of a suicide bombing and the glory that brings their stone age version of Islam, they will have no hesitation in using them should push come to shove i would bet? So as said in an earlier post the West needs to back Israel to the hilt and ensure they destroy any capability Iran may be developing, not bring up petty arguments for supporting the Ayatollahs in any way, only a cսnt would support them![]()
Two spastics:
"While France was a strong ally of the UK during the Falklands War and imposed an arms embargo on Argentina once the conflict began, the situation is more nuanced than a simple "no."Here's a breakdown:
"While France was a strong ally of the UK during the Falklands War and imposed an arms embargo on Argentina once the conflict began, the situation is more nuanced than a simple "no."Here's a breakdown:
- Pre-War Sales: France had sold a number of weapons systems to Argentina before the Falklands War broke out, most notably Super Étendard aircraft and Exocet anti-ship missiles. These were critical to Argentina's capabilities during the conflict, and Exocet missiles were famously used to sink HMS Sheffield and Atlantic Conveyor.
- Embargo and Support for the UK: Once Argentina invaded the Falklands, France quickly imposed an arms embargo, ceasing all official military sales and support to Argentina. Furthermore, France provided significant support to the UK, including:
- Allowing British forces to use French port facilities in West Africa.
- Providing intelligence and detailed information about the French-made weapons and aircraft that Argentina possessed. This was crucial for the Royal Navy to develop countermeasures.
- Cooperating with British efforts to prevent Argentina from acquiring more Exocet missiles on the international arms market.
- Even providing Mirages for the Royal Navy's Harrier pilots to practice against, simulating Argentine aircraft."
-
- Posts: 1697
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Exactly, contracts are signed, weapons supplied, us Brits have supplied to some pretty dodgy regimes over the years as well lets not forget! And as soon as the conflict broke out most of those contracts would have been paused if from allies of the UK but pretty hard to stop the use of weapons already there or en route.
These Ayatollahs are a different ball game though, should they develop a nuclear weapons they will hold the middle east if not the world to ransom and seeing their love of a suicide bombing and the glory that brings their stone age version of Islam, they will have no hesitation in using them should push come to shove i would bet? So as said in an earlier post the West needs to back Israel to the hilt and ensure they destroy any capability Iran may be developing, not bring up petty arguments for supporting the Ayatollahs in any way, only a cսnt would support them
These Ayatollahs are a different ball game though, should they develop a nuclear weapons they will hold the middle east if not the world to ransom and seeing their love of a suicide bombing and the glory that brings their stone age version of Islam, they will have no hesitation in using them should push come to shove i would bet? So as said in an earlier post the West needs to back Israel to the hilt and ensure they destroy any capability Iran may be developing, not bring up petty arguments for supporting the Ayatollahs in any way, only a cսnt would support them
Re: Iran v Israel
Collins Wong - A Free Man" wrote: ↑14 Jun 2025, 23:35 Israel delivered weapons to Argentina at the height of the Falklands war, weapons that were used to kill British servicemen.
Not our ally.
Not our friend.
Vermin.
so did the French, the real dangerous stuff like Exocet missiles etc... I surmise the Yanks would have supplied a lot weaponry, they more or less financed the military regimes.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Israel delivered weapons to Argentina at the height of the Falklands war, weapons that were used to kill British servicemen.
Not our ally.
Not our friend.
Vermin.
Not our ally.
Not our friend.
Vermin.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Jun 2025, 10:46 Iran starts lobbing ordnance at Israel means less weaponry to send to Russia.
Wind the fuckers up as much as possible.
Russia has been making their own version (Geran') of the Iranian suicide drones (Shaheds) for 2+ years now.
This won't affect the Russians.
This won't affect the Russians.
-
- Posts: 1697
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I find it ironic that those on the far-left denouncing Israel as war mongers and aggressors for these TARGETED strikes by saying Iran has the right to defend itself and is the "victim" blah blah blah, don't say a dicky bird about Iran responding by firing indiscriminately into Israel or targeting areas of high civilian population?
Also, that these Ayatollahs should they have their way would target and get rid of any purple haired, pronoun wearing, rainbow flag waiving, LGBTQI, DEI supporter and they would really find out the meaning of "victim" or of being discriminated against
Also, that these Ayatollahs should they have their way would target and get rid of any purple haired, pronoun wearing, rainbow flag waiving, LGBTQI, DEI supporter and they would really find out the meaning of "victim" or of being discriminated against
Re: Iran v Israel
We need a pincer movement of Israel doing the dirty work, being the regional military counter, and the US and Europe piling on the sanctions. Ultimately it wont change until the current regime is removed because they are bent on getting Nukes, although who knows what the resulting power vacuum would bring. The Middle East is never ending saga.
- RootsRadical
- Posts: 781
- Old WHO Number: 321614
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 99 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Anyone supporting Iran in the West is either pro Iranian regime or just a wrongun!
Israel has superior strength and will / should win a war with Iran.
They planned this attack for years. Mossad and special ops have been operating inside Iran preparing for this.
They already took out Iran's air defences a few months ago during the last wave of attacks.
iran is weak.
They would have weighed up the risks and would be confident otherwise they wouldn't have gone ahead.
Iran will be rocked by the damage done to their nuclear prigram, their leadership and military infrastructure.
Israel had little choice as Iran was very close to getting nuclear weapons which would threaten the future of Israel & change the balance of power in the region.
Israel has superior strength and will / should win a war with Iran.
They planned this attack for years. Mossad and special ops have been operating inside Iran preparing for this.
They already took out Iran's air defences a few months ago during the last wave of attacks.
iran is weak.
They would have weighed up the risks and would be confident otherwise they wouldn't have gone ahead.
Iran will be rocked by the damage done to their nuclear prigram, their leadership and military infrastructure.
Israel had little choice as Iran was very close to getting nuclear weapons which would threaten the future of Israel & change the balance of power in the region.
-
- Posts: 689
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 103 times
- Been liked: 64 times
Re: Iran v Israel
26 May 1958 | Israel v Iran | L | 4-0 | Asian Games |
05 Dec 1959 | Iran v Israel | W | 3-0 | AFC Asian Cup |
12 Dec 1959 | Israel v Iran | D | 1-1 | AFC Asian Cup |
19 May 1968 | Iran v Israel | W | 2-1 | AFC Asian Cup |
15 Sep 1974 | Iran v Israel | W | 1-0 |
- ragingbull
- Posts: 345
- Old WHO Number: 210831
- Has liked: 109 times
- Been liked: 50 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Jun 2025, 07:51No VAR (what is it good for?) as the home nation is not in the top division.
The Yanks are in charge of VAR at Langley Park,the Iranians are disputing the last Israeli strike was offside by a nose.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3357
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
That's the game at play. It'll be like the equivalent of an Iranian WHOicide by the time everyone's finished teasing them.
Iran already being goaded in to hitting civvy locations has put them in a bad position instead of targeting military bases etc.
Iran already being goaded in to hitting civvy locations has put them in a bad position instead of targeting military bases etc.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3969
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 395 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Iran starts lobbing ordnance at Israel means less weaponry to send to Russia.
Wind the fuckers up as much as possible.
Wind the fuckers up as much as possible.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3357
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑14 Jun 2025, 10:01 "Iran has warned the UK, US and France not to help Israel stop its strikes on the country.
Tehran said they will target ships and bases belonging to the three countries in the region if they do not step back.
That's according to comments reported by Iranian state media."
So, no different to what Iran do now then?
Good. Let them empty as much of their ARSENAL as possible so they are left depleted and weak as fuck for the long term future.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1313
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 127 times
Re: Iran v Israel
On the flip side of Branded’s figures, the official population of Jews living in Yemen is one.
His name is Levi Marhabi.
His name is Levi Marhabi.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3087
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 440 times
Re: Iran v Israel
"Iran has warned the UK, US and France not to help Israel stop its strikes on the country.
Tehran said they will target ships and bases belonging to the three countries in the region if they do not step back.
That's according to comments reported by Iranian state media."
So, no different to what Iran do now then?
Tehran said they will target ships and bases belonging to the three countries in the region if they do not step back.
That's according to comments reported by Iranian state media."
So, no different to what Iran do now then?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3357
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Iran has had it coming. Hopefully they get levelled and start again in the Conference League.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3969
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 395 times
-
- Posts: 51
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 22 times
-
- Posts: 1414
- Has liked: 967 times
- Been liked: 502 times
-
- Posts: 1697
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Away win?
Israel struck first, then Iran responded but another decent attack from the Jews saw them go ahead.
If it goes to a "shootout" then my moneys on the yids!
Israel struck first, then Iran responded but another decent attack from the Jews saw them go ahead.
If it goes to a "shootout" then my moneys on the yids!