AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Iran v Israel
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Iran v Israel
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1312
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 127 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Faux, totally disagree with that, it’s the other way round.
There were ongoing discussions between the US and Iran to find a way to restart the JCPOA, which had been agreed years before with the US, European countries and Iran. Any negotiations like that are bound to have big sticking points but the dialogue was still ongoing.
only one country didn’t like that and here we are now.
Israel is the tail wagging the dog, and they should’ve just cut to the chase with all this and gone to war with Iran two years ago.
There were ongoing discussions between the US and Iran to find a way to restart the JCPOA, which had been agreed years before with the US, European countries and Iran. Any negotiations like that are bound to have big sticking points but the dialogue was still ongoing.
only one country didn’t like that and here we are now.
Israel is the tail wagging the dog, and they should’ve just cut to the chase with all this and gone to war with Iran two years ago.
Re: Iran v Israel
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 09:13 The Americans have wanted to take out Iran for years if not decades
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
What could possibly go wrong with forced regime change in the Middle East?
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 06:32 Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
You don't see any issues with the biggest supplier of state funded terrorism to have nuclear weapons?
-
- Posts: 2674
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Iran v Israel
The Americans have wanted to take out Iran for years if not decades
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 06:32 Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
Put together a list of nation states who have declared their aim is to wipe another nation state and it's people from the face of the earth.
Then give good reasons why such states should be allowed develop the technology that allows them to do so.
Illustrate your answer with diagrams if you feel it will help. The use of crayons is permitted.
Then give good reasons why such states should be allowed develop the technology that allows them to do so.
Illustrate your answer with diagrams if you feel it will help. The use of crayons is permitted.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Anybody actually believe what Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said today?
Seems to me he's saying that he (and by default, his (HIS) people) don't want to live on a planet that has Israel as a nation state.
Sounds like he needs his bluff calling: the world seems to have ridden most of the (energy related) issues thrown up by Russia's invasion of the Ukraine, so that would suggest it can do so again.
They start targeting energy production sites in countries not involved in this skirmish and the shit really will hit the fan for them.
Seems to me he's saying that he (and by default, his (HIS) people) don't want to live on a planet that has Israel as a nation state.
Sounds like he needs his bluff calling: the world seems to have ridden most of the (energy related) issues thrown up by Russia's invasion of the Ukraine, so that would suggest it can do so again.
They start targeting energy production sites in countries not involved in this skirmish and the shit really will hit the fan for them.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
- RootsRadical
- Posts: 781
- Old WHO Number: 321614
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 99 times
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑17 Jun 2025, 01:07 I don't give a shit about either of them..
All I care about is my own (kin and country)
You should give a shit because if Israel capitulates, the fundamentalists will be looking for their next target/victory and the obvious choice is somewhere they've been sending fertile young men of fighting age for decades.
The army is already in place and society will willingly provide the weaponry.
The army is already in place and society will willingly provide the weaponry.
-
- Posts: 1414
- Has liked: 967 times
- Been liked: 502 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I don't give a shit about either of them..
All I care about is my own (kin and country)
All I care about is my own (kin and country)
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 20:21Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 17:44Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 17:32 How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
No.
How about if Israel stops committing war crimes, will that work?
How about if Israel allows aid convoys into Gaza, rather than adopting a policy of collective punishment? Will that work?
How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza, will that work?
How about if Israel stops building illegal settlements on the West Bank and removes the existing ones, will that work?Well, do YOU think (not hope or really (REALLY) want, but think) that the options you've offered up will stop the aggression on both sides?
Will we (have to) allow a teensy-weensy bit of aggression (against Israel, naturally) while we wait and see if your suggestions work?Everything tried so far, hasn't stopped the violence, so who knows if they will work or not. Could be worth a try.
And where did I say Israel should put up with agression? I'm saying they should strike back in ways which don't involve war crimes. I mean I can't put Israel's right to self defence more clearly than "How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza."
Nothing screams more loudly than a statement like " "How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza."" that you're intent of dragging the debate down to 6th-form levels of "solutions".
How do you target somebody hiding in a school or hospital?
How long should you be allowed to take to acquire and dispatch said target?
How much further aggression against your people should you have to tolerate whilst setting up each targeted assassination?
To be honest, if I had any say in Israelis reactions to the constant aggression of they've been on the receiving end down the years, I'd have long since handed out, in a language or method they fully understand, a slap that made the aggressor(s) go "FUCK THAT! Won't ever try that one again!".
The only thing of such magnitude I can think of at the moment is a dirty bomb down each and every entrance tunnel to Iran's underground nuclear facilities; the very earth protecting them will paradoxically prevent nuclear contamination polluting the atmosphere and at the same time render these facilities inaccessible for decades, if not hundreds of years.
It may well be that Iran are trying to coax/goad Israel into initiating a "traditional" Hiroshima style nuclear strike in an attempt to claim the global moral high ground (on behalf of their faith). The above suggestion may, they would try to claim, realise their dreams, but not quite in the way they pray for.
Desperate times often need desperate measures, especially if whoever opposes you does not share with you a common set of life's values.
How do you target somebody hiding in a school or hospital?
How long should you be allowed to take to acquire and dispatch said target?
How much further aggression against your people should you have to tolerate whilst setting up each targeted assassination?
To be honest, if I had any say in Israelis reactions to the constant aggression of they've been on the receiving end down the years, I'd have long since handed out, in a language or method they fully understand, a slap that made the aggressor(s) go "FUCK THAT! Won't ever try that one again!".
The only thing of such magnitude I can think of at the moment is a dirty bomb down each and every entrance tunnel to Iran's underground nuclear facilities; the very earth protecting them will paradoxically prevent nuclear contamination polluting the atmosphere and at the same time render these facilities inaccessible for decades, if not hundreds of years.
It may well be that Iran are trying to coax/goad Israel into initiating a "traditional" Hiroshima style nuclear strike in an attempt to claim the global moral high ground (on behalf of their faith). The above suggestion may, they would try to claim, realise their dreams, but not quite in the way they pray for.
Desperate times often need desperate measures, especially if whoever opposes you does not share with you a common set of life's values.
-
- Posts: 281
- Old WHO Number: 22726
- Has liked: 68 times
- Been liked: 59 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 17:44Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 17:32 How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
No.
How about if Israel stops committing war crimes, will that work?
How about if Israel allows aid convoys into Gaza, rather than adopting a policy of collective punishment? Will that work?
How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza, will that work?
How about if Israel stops building illegal settlements on the West Bank and removes the existing ones, will that work?Well, do YOU think (not hope or really (REALLY) want, but think) that the options you've offered up will stop the aggression on both sides?
Will we (have to) allow a teensy-weensy bit of aggression (against Israel, naturally) while we wait and see if your suggestions work?
Everything tried so far, hasn't stopped the violence, so who knows if they will work or not. Could be worth a try.
And where did I say Israel should put up with agression? I'm saying they should strike back in ways which don't involve war crimes. I mean I can't put Israel's right to self defence more clearly than "How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza."
And where did I say Israel should put up with agression? I'm saying they should strike back in ways which don't involve war crimes. I mean I can't put Israel's right to self defence more clearly than "How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza."
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 17:32 How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
No.
How about if Israel stops committing war crimes, will that work?
How about if Israel allows aid convoys into Gaza, rather than adopting a policy of collective punishment? Will that work?
How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza, will that work?
How about if Israel stops building illegal settlements on the West Bank and removes the existing ones, will that work?
Well, do YOU think (not hope or really (REALLY) want, but think) that the options you've offered up will stop the aggression on both sides?
Will we (have to) allow a teensy-weensy bit of aggression (against Israel, naturally) while we wait and see if your suggestions work?
Will we (have to) allow a teensy-weensy bit of aggression (against Israel, naturally) while we wait and see if your suggestions work?
Re: Iran v Israel
How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
No.
How about if Israel stops committing war crimes, will that work?
How about if Israel allows aid convoys into Gaza, rather than adopting a policy of collective punishment? Will that work?
How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza, will that work?
How about if Israel stops building illegal settlements on the West Bank and removes the existing ones, will that work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
No.
How about if Israel stops committing war crimes, will that work?
How about if Israel allows aid convoys into Gaza, rather than adopting a policy of collective punishment? Will that work?
How about if Israel uses targeted assasinations, rather than carpet bombing Gaza, will that work?
How about if Israel stops building illegal settlements on the West Bank and removes the existing ones, will that work?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 14:51 "I asked YOU what they need to do to stop the violence."
Stop indiscriminately bombing Gaza, unless they have an ambitious target of civilian deaths they want to try and get to (currently in excess of 50,000).
Violence is allowed by Israel, in defending itself. What it has been doing, goes way beyond self defence, more like a revnge killing spree.
That might be an outcome you want, but there's no historical proof that will actually happen.
How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
How about Hamas operatives stop using civilians as human shields. Do you think that will work?
How about the population of Gaza give up all Hamas operatives to Israel and release the remaining hostages? Do you think that will work?
How about if Iran formally accepts the state of Israel and it's right to peacefully exist, rather than demanding it's eradication from the earth, and in addition issues unconditional fatwa's on any who disrespect Iran's choice and keep attacking Israel. Do you think that will work?
Re: Iran v Israel
"I asked YOU what they need to do to stop the violence."
Stop indiscriminately bombing Gaza, unless they have an ambitious target of civilian deaths they want to try and get to (currently in excess of 50,000).
Violence is allowed by Israel, in defending itself. What it has been doing, goes way beyond self defence, more like a revnge killing spree.
Stop indiscriminately bombing Gaza, unless they have an ambitious target of civilian deaths they want to try and get to (currently in excess of 50,000).
Violence is allowed by Israel, in defending itself. What it has been doing, goes way beyond self defence, more like a revnge killing spree.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I didn't enquire about your confidence level of them finding a solution. I asked YOU what they need to do to stop the violence.
Let's please not drag this debate down to 6th form level "politics" and, instead, look for a practical solution that has a chance of success.
Let's please not drag this debate down to 6th form level "politics" and, instead, look for a practical solution that has a chance of success.
Re: Iran v Israel
"So, how, exactly, do they achieve that, and how will that prevent attacks by Iran and it's proxies from continuing in the meantime?"
I'm sure they could find a way, although I doubt the pager routine will work again.
I'm sure they could find a way, although I doubt the pager routine will work again.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Westside wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 07:32Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 04:02Westside wrote: ↑15 Jun 2025, 18:56No.
Mind you, Israel seem a bit pre occupied with wiping Gazza, off the face of the earth. They could easily take out their enemies, like with the pager attack on Hezbollah, without tens of thousands of deaths in collateral damege. Even going back to the 70's, they took targeted revenge, on the members of Black September, they deemed responsible for the Munich Olympics massacre, with very minor disruption, to others.So, how do you suggest they do that in the 21st century while preventing further attacks against themselves?
Do you actually believe Iran will let Hamas stop attacking Israel should the people of Gaza (try/offer to) take part in negotiating a potential peace deal with their neighbours?
Or are you of the belief that Israel should continue to accept yet more terrorism on it's land and against it's people "While we see which way the talks go"?"So, how do you suggest they do that in the 21st century while preventing further attacks against themselves?"
By targeted attacks by special forces and Mossad, as I described earlier, rather than carpet bombing an entire area.
So, how, exactly, do they achieve that, and how will that prevent attacks by Iran and it's proxies from continuing in the meantime?
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3085
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Jun 2025, 04:02Westside wrote: ↑15 Jun 2025, 18:56Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑15 Jun 2025, 15:59 Do you think that it's Israel's turn to be wiped off the face of the earth?No.
Mind you, Israel seem a bit pre occupied with wiping Gazza, off the face of the earth. They could easily take out their enemies, like with the pager attack on Hezbollah, without tens of thousands of deaths in collateral damege. Even going back to the 70's, they took targeted revenge, on the members of Black September, they deemed responsible for the Munich Olympics massacre, with very minor disruption, to others.So, how do you suggest they do that in the 21st century while preventing further attacks against themselves?
Do you actually believe Iran will let Hamas stop attacking Israel should the people of Gaza (try/offer to) take part in negotiating a potential peace deal with their neighbours?
Or are you of the belief that Israel should continue to accept yet more terrorism on it's land and against it's people "While we see which way the talks go"?
"So, how do you suggest they do that in the 21st century while preventing further attacks against themselves?"
By targeted attacks by special forces and Mossad, as I described earlier, rather than carpet bombing an entire area.
By targeted attacks by special forces and Mossad, as I described earlier, rather than carpet bombing an entire area.