Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 716
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 92 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 717
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

goose wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 17:00
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 16:41
goose wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:15
hahaha one line of New Balance trainers? i'll give you a grand for any of the others that you've actually heard of, never mind seen in a shop or bought. I reckon you'd deffo wear those San Antonio sneekers.
Redwing aren't sportswear but i'd say they are the only credible brand on there, otherwise nobody is buying those awful things.

i pointed out it was <1% further down.

European brands were more expensive pre-tariffs, they will still be more expensive if you now have to trade up to them because you cannot afford Nike/Adidas.

btw Nike/Adidas are not luxury sportswear, they're middle market.

Nike, Adidas, Converse, Sketchers, Puma all by and large manufacture in Asia. That's not changing.
This was what you posted: 'European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.' Rowing back on it after you've been caught out doesn't change that.

And your post about European brands is nonsense. On one hand you concede they will be more competitive (Nike/Addidas are priced out) and on the other hand they are more expensive.

And ALL branded sports shoes are luxury items. It's like trying to claim a £500 cricket bat is a necessity.

The words you are looking for are, 'Oh yes, I was wrong'. But by all means keep digging and squirming, you silly sod.
The original post you responded to had this in it: "Less than 1% of the trainers sold in the USA are manufactured there.".
No rowing back, less than 1% of such a huge market is nothing. Lets not play silly games.

The European brand trainers (not many of them either) were more expensive than Nike back in Feb this year. Tariffs means those Nikes are/will be even more expensive so if you're buying trainers then it will cost you more than it did in Feb either way.

Luxury trainers are the likes of Jimmy Choo, Prada, Gucci.............. if you think Nike is a luxury brand you're a mile off. 

I'm 100% right on this.
Trainers in the US will become more expensive for consumers. 
Now you can pop online and buy yourself a pair of San Antonio sneekers.
Changes story from one post to the next re totally irrelavant figure on US market (we are talking about future competitiveness, not current market share)- 'Now let's not play silly games'

European shoes were more expensive, so Chinese shoes getting more expensive means you will be paying more either way. ???  So, you are conflating European and US made shoes getting more competitive with consumers have to pay more. A different issue and not one that I ever disputed - though I could. Typical Goose deflection when in the wrong.

Luxury trainers are... I don't give a shit about your fashion sensibilities - all branded trainers are luxury items. Nobody's lifestyle will change as a result of having pay a few bucks more for their dim-witted choice of branding. Trainers are not meat or potatoes.

'I'm 100% right' - said Goose on every thread ever, especially when 100% wrong.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 17:40
Who do you think is paying that money?
XKhammer
Posts: 815
Has liked: 464 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 16:22 Only took Two Tier a year to achieve this.


Image
Still higher than Trump's USA lol 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 16:41
goose wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:15
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:00
I see you are being deliberately obtuse and selective again.

If there are not presently US manufacturers of athletics shoes, the tariffs make it more likely that there can be. By the way, here's a list of 20 US producers of sports that you claim don't exist. www.allamericanmade.com/shoes-made-in-usa/

European shoes will become relatively cheaper to Chinese ones as you obviously know but are obfuscating.

Finally, as I pointed out, nobody gives a fuck if overpriced luxury goods get more expensive.
hahaha one line of New Balance trainers? i'll give you a grand for any of the others that you've actually heard of, never mind seen in a shop or bought. I reckon you'd deffo wear those San Antonio sneekers.
Redwing aren't sportswear but i'd say they are the only credible brand on there, otherwise nobody is buying those awful things.

i pointed out it was <1% further down.

European brands were more expensive pre-tariffs, they will still be more expensive if you now have to trade up to them because you cannot afford Nike/Adidas.

btw Nike/Adidas are not luxury sportswear, they're middle market.

Nike, Adidas, Converse, Sketchers, Puma all by and large manufacture in Asia. That's not changing.
This was what you posted: 'European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.' Rowing back on it after you've been caught out doesn't change that.

And your post about European brands is nonsense. On one hand you concede they will be more competitive (Nike/Addidas are priced out) and on the other hand they are more expensive.

And ALL branded sports shoes are luxury items. It's like trying to claim a £500 cricket bat is a necessity.

The words you are looking for are, 'Oh yes, I was wrong'. But by all means keep digging and squirming, you silly sod.
The original post you responded to had this in it: "Less than 1% of the trainers sold in the USA are manufactured there.".
No rowing back, less than 1% of such a huge market is nothing. Lets not play silly games.

The European brand trainers (not many of them either) were more expensive than Nike back in Feb this year. Tariffs means those Nikes are/will be even more expensive so if you're buying trainers then it will cost you more than it did in Feb either way.

Luxury trainers are the likes of Jimmy Choo, Prada, Gucci.............. if you think Nike is a luxury brand you're a mile off. 

I'm 100% right on this.
Trainers in the US will become more expensive for consumers. 
Now you can pop online and buy yourself a pair of San Antonio sneekers.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 717
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

goose wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:15
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:00
goose wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 07:41
Which ones are you talking about? European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.
So you’re asking the US consumer to buy more expensive European manufactured brands or the more expensive Nike/Adidas.

whichever way, your trainers are now more expensive.
I see you are being deliberately obtuse and selective again.

If there are not presently US manufacturers of athletics shoes, the tariffs make it more likely that there can be. By the way, here's a list of 20 US producers of sports that you claim don't exist. www.allamericanmade.com/shoes-made-in-usa/

European shoes will become relatively cheaper to Chinese ones as you obviously know but are obfuscating.

Finally, as I pointed out, nobody gives a fuck if overpriced luxury goods get more expensive.
hahaha one line of New Balance trainers? i'll give you a grand for any of the others that you've actually heard of, never mind seen in a shop or bought. I reckon you'd deffo wear those San Antonio sneekers.
Redwing aren't sportswear but i'd say they are the only credible brand on there, otherwise nobody is buying those awful things.

i pointed out it was <1% further down.

European brands were more expensive pre-tariffs, they will still be more expensive if you now have to trade up to them because you cannot afford Nike/Adidas.

btw Nike/Adidas are not luxury sportswear, they're middle market.

Nike, Adidas, Converse, Sketchers, Puma all by and large manufacture in Asia. That's not changing.
This was what you posted: 'European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.' Rowing back on it after you've been caught out doesn't change that.

And your post about European brands is nonsense. On one hand you concede they will be more competitive (Nike/Addidas are priced out) and on the other hand they are more expensive.

And ALL branded sports shoes are luxury items. It's like trying to claim a £500 cricket bat is a necessity.

The words you are looking for are, 'Oh yes, I was wrong'. But by all means keep digging and squirming, you silly sod.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3553
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Only took Two Tier a year to achieve this.


Image
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 14:00
goose wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 07:41
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 00:58
Well now is the chance for US manufacturers and those from perhaps the UK and other low-tariff places to sell some shoes that don't rely on slave labour
Which ones are you talking about? European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.
So you’re asking the US consumer to buy more expensive European manufactured brands or the more expensive Nike/Adidas.

whichever way, your trainers are now more expensive.
I see you are being deliberately obtuse and selective again.

If there are not presently US manufacturers of athletics shoes, the tariffs make it more likely that there can be. By the way, here's a list of 20 US producers of sports that you claim don't exist. www.allamericanmade.com/shoes-made-in-usa/

European shoes will become relatively cheaper to Chinese ones as you obviously know but are obfuscating.

Finally, as I pointed out, nobody gives a fuck if overpriced luxury goods get more expensive.
hahaha one line of New Balance trainers? i'll give you a grand for any of the others that you've actually heard of, never mind seen in a shop or bought. I reckon you'd deffo wear those San Antonio sneekers.
Redwing aren't sportswear but i'd say they are the only credible brand on there, otherwise nobody is buying those awful things.

i pointed out it was <1% further down.

European brands were more expensive pre-tariffs, they will still be more expensive if you now have to trade up to them because you cannot afford Nike/Adidas.

btw Nike/Adidas are not luxury sportswear, they're middle market.

Nike, Adidas, Converse, Sketchers, Puma all by and large manufacture in Asia. That's not changing.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 717
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

goose wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 07:41
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 00:58
goose wrote: 27 Jun 2025, 21:24
 
Nike & Adidas have both said they’re putting up prices because of tariffs.

Less than 1% of the trainers sold in the USA are manufactured there. There are no US alternatives. Nobody of any size or scale is manufacturing trainers in the USA. 
Well now is the chance for US manufacturers and those from perhaps the UK and other low-tariff places to sell some shoes that don't rely on slave labour
Which ones are you talking about? European manufactured brands are already more expensive and US ones don’t exist.
So you’re asking the US consumer to buy more expensive European manufactured brands or the more expensive Nike/Adidas.

whichever way, your trainers are now more expensive.
I see you are being deliberately obtuse and selective again.

If there are not presently US manufacturers of athletics shoes, the tariffs make it more likely that there can be. By the way, here's a list of 20 US producers of sports and other shoes that you claim don't exist. www.allamericanmade.com/shoes-made-in-usa/

European shoes will become relatively cheaper with reference to Chinese ones as you obviously know but are obfuscating.

Finally, as I pointed out, nobody really gives a fuck if overpriced luxury goods get more expensive.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3553
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

BRANDED wrote: 30 Jun 2025, 08:28 Professor Sir Chris Whitty was responsible for government guidance that was believed to have triggered the spread of Covid into care homes, The Telegraph can disclose.The Chief Medical Officer has told the Covid Inquiry that he was “not closely involved” in decisions behind a scheme to discharge thousands of hospital patients into care homes at the start of the pandemic.However, government emails obtained by The Telegraph show that Sir Chris’s office signed off guidance for care homes in England, advising them that they could take patients from hospital who had not even been tested.Emails also reveal that Helen Whately, the former social care minister, warned colleagues that sending people with Covid into care homes “surely materially increases” the risks to residents.However, she signed the guidance off anyway after officials said that one of Sir Chris’s two deputies was “content with the advice”.The care homes guidance, published on April 2 2020, is considered one of the worst mistakes of the pandemic, and has been branded “irrational” by the High Court.Sir Chris and Ms Whately will face scrutiny over their part in the guidance during the Covid Inquiry, which opens its examination of care homes on Monday.Telegraph
I get the impression most of those who were hoodwinked by COVID are too embarrassed to talk about it now, BRANDED.

You still have idiots like joyo beating the facemask drum, but most people just want to brush it under the carpet and hope it all goes away.
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 1798
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 163 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BRANDED »

Professor Sir Chris Whitty was responsible for government guidance that was believed to have triggered the spread of Covid into care homes, The Telegraph can disclose.The Chief Medical Officer has told the Covid Inquiry that he was “not closely involved” in decisions behind a scheme to discharge thousands of hospital patients into care homes at the start of the pandemic.However, government emails obtained by The Telegraph show that Sir Chris’s office signed off guidance for care homes in England, advising them that they could take patients from hospital who had not even been tested.Emails also reveal that Helen Whately, the former social care minister, warned colleagues that sending people with Covid into care homes “surely materially increases” the risks to residents.However, she signed the guidance off anyway after officials said that one of Sir Chris’s two deputies was “content with the advice”.The care homes guidance, published on April 2 2020, is considered one of the worst mistakes of the pandemic, and has been branded “irrational” by the High Court.Sir Chris and Ms Whately will face scrutiny over their part in the guidance during the Covid Inquiry, which opens its examination of care homes on Monday.Telegraph
XKhammer
Posts: 815
Has liked: 464 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

Thought Trump going to sort out Ukrainian war in first day in office instead he's ignoring the biggest despot on planet and somehow blaming Zelensky 
Trump done a good job with Iran but he's a disaster with Ukraine
Mind you if Harris was in charge Iran would now have a nuke
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jun 2025, 12:35

So that's Pakistan, Israel and now the Congo that have called for Trump to get the Nobel Peace Prize. Contrary to the nonsense rhetoric of the clueless left that tried hard down the years to paint him out to be a vile warmongering dangerous shitcunt. 😂

Trump sorts Ukraine and Russias shit out, he'll piss the award and be revered for decades to come innthe history books. 
I cant quite fathom whether you are on a wind up or not? Hopefully you are and very funny too! 😁
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 29 Jun 2025, 15:16
goose wrote: 29 Jun 2025, 08:08
XKhammer wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 23:06 Reform has 840 councillors you can't really
label them all as dangerous because of this woman
How many labour and tories have been nicked over the years?
So you’re saying you can’t judge a large group of people based on the actions of a tiny minority????
Except Eyeties as all are soap dodgers
I won’t call every ginger cyclists a nonce just because you are.
XKhammer
Posts: 815
Has liked: 464 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 29 Jun 2025, 08:08
XKhammer wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 23:06 Reform has 840 councillors you can't really
label them all as dangerous because of this woman
How many labour and tories have been nicked over the years?
So you’re saying you can’t judge a large group of people based on the actions of a tiny minority????
Except Eyeties as all are soap dodgers
OK_Guy
Posts: 89
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 23:56 A "bird" assaulting pregnant women and abusing little kids is a "little fracas" to you? Says more about you than anyone else.
I see Mandy Clare was a recent local Labour representative until she was hounded out for her views on women (women don't have penis, men do)... so hardly Reform by choice.

no I won't be voting Labour, Reform or any other shit Political-party
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4865
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2778 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »



So that's Pakistan, Israel and now the Congo that have called for Trump to get the Nobel Peace Prize. Contrary to the nonsense rhetoric of the clueless left that tried hard down the years to paint him out to be a vile warmongering dangerous shitcunt. 😂

Trump sorts Ukraine and Russias shit out, he'll piss the award and be revered for decades to come innthe history books. 
only1billybonds
Posts: 2123
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 645 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

They has obviously forgotten about the Labour MP up in Runcorn who actually battered a bloke in the street in full public view. Going by OSD's standards, this means that all Labour mp's are violent thugs or have I missed something.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 23:06 Reform has 840 councillors you can't really
label them all as dangerous because of this woman
How many labour and tories have been nicked over the years?
So you’re saying you can’t judge a large group of people based on the actions of a tiny minority????
Eerie Decent
Posts: 754
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 306 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

What exactly happened to them to make you so scared?
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

A "bird" assaulting pregnant women and abusing little kids is a "little fracas" to you? Says more about you than anyone else.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 754
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 306 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 28 Jun 2025, 21:58 Lovely bunch these Reform politicians. Make us all feel safe.
1751141435796.png

 
A bird having a little fracas in a park makes you feel unsafe?

No wonder your arse absolutely fell out when Wong just stuck it right on you, you absolute minge.
XKhammer
Posts: 815
Has liked: 464 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

Reform has 840 councillors you can't really
label them all as dangerous because of this woman
How many labour and tories have been nicked over the years?
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Lovely bunch these Reform politicians. Make us all feel safe.
1751141435796.png
 
Post Reply