New Kits

[stubbo-admin]

Newsflash...it's not Kappa....but in my opinion they look shite.

Anyway, supposedly these are very very close to what the actual kits look like.

Hate the claret socks. Looks like a Burnley kit.

[wils]

Third kit looks amateur. The disproportionate hammers is childish.

[BerlingtonBertie]

At least Fraser can see the badge for the first time in years!

[On The Ball]

Don't like the 3rd either.

It's as if it's a final fuck you for changing brands

Requested by the Club - particularly home and away.

[On The Ball]

And that badge. The symbol of everything we despise in our owners.  “West Ham London” .  Represents Sullivan and Brady’s attempt to change the supporter demographic, remove all historic links to its working class roots etc and go full blown corporate and make sure our fans are actually “consumers”.  Umbrella in your £10 pint of lager anyone?

I get why you think it's that, but that isn't even 1% of it. It's PURELY to appeal to the foreign market. Same as most crest changes/simplifications.

I have no idea why the word 'LONDON' would appeal to foreign markets, but there we are.

[Far Cough UKunt]

Thanks for the compliment.

[Mad Ferret]

You're a cսnt, Far Right.

But not for buying the new shirt.

[Far Cough UKunt]

"The Oxford Navy Blue shirt reflects the colours of our first jerseys as Thames Ironworks, complemented by a Gold trim, influenced by the Gold Hammers which make up our crest."

The OS

Call me a cսnt, I've just bought one, sans the sponsor.

[Jaan Kenbrovin]

The third is hideous as well. What a truly atrocious set of kits.

[Mad Dog]

Don't like the 3rd either.

It's as if it's a final fuck you for changing brands

[greenie1]

I think the 3rd looks fine. 
The green logo on the sleeve however looks gash on all 3.
If that logo was say, smaller, or the same colour as the badge, then that would be acceptable.

[twoleftfeet]

I rather like it.

Prefer it without the sponsorship on the front as well.

[El Scorchio]

Very weird kit in terms of the colour choices. Feels quite Wimbledon. Not disgusting although I guess we'll wear it about once or twice. 

Incidentally, On The Ball's description of it he sent two weeks ago is absolutely spot on.

[LeroysBoots]

Badge is mahoosive but I do like the colour combination, it's probably the best of the 3, in my opinion

[Lee Trundle]

And that badge. The symbol of everything we despise in our owners.  “West Ham London” .  Represents Sullivan and Brady’s attempt to change the supporter demographic, remove all historic links to its working class roots etc and go full blown corporate and make sure our fans are actually “consumers”.  Umbrella in your £10 pint of lager anyone?

Eh?  There's no West Ham London on the badge is there, or am I missing it?

[Sir Alf]

And that badge. The symbol of everything we despise in our owners.  “West Ham London” .  Represents Sullivan and Brady’s attempt to change the supporter demographic, remove all historic links to its working class roots etc and go full blown corporate and make sure our fans are actually “consumers”.  Umbrella in your £10 pint of lager anyone?

[Mad Ferret]

Some people really are never happy.

[Sir Alf]

I used to like white socks with our kit like the olden days .   jumpers for goalposts isnt it? 

[Fauxstralian]

Not shown on the publicity shots but on the shop on the o/s it has YELLOW shorts with YELLOW socks with a navy band on the top

[Fauxstralian]

Never keen on collars on shirts
Why not the standard badge of every other shirt?
 

[Mad Ferret]

Third kit probably the pick of the bunch but why is the simplified badge supersized?

I'm actually surprised it doesn't break some kind of badge size regulation.

[goose]

I like the 3rd.

[fraser]

It's very meh.. 

[Ron Eff]

Third kit probably the pick of the bunch but why is the simplified badge supersized?

[On The Ball]

Tell us more.

[Mad Ferret]

Navy with gold/yellow accents.

Also a simplified badge.