AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 839
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 35 times
- Been liked: 141 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 16:00You've gone from 'no-one deserves to die for their beliefs' to endless posts focusing on his character as if he did deserve it, and repeatedly claimed the far right were responsible when all reports suggest the murderer was radicalised in left wing ideology, was part of Antifa discord groups and had a trans gender partner.
Have a day off.
I thought Sven was doing some weird trolling with the amount of double downing he was doing.
-
- Posts: 910
- Been liked: 219 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 11:39 All of this reminds me of a joke i once read
Woman speaking to a man and he says "i believe women should remain in the home and obey their husband, i believe being gay is disgusting should have remained illegal in this country and jews are evil"
Horrified she replied "oh you must be a trump supporter then bigot"
"No no, im a muslim" he answered
She said "oh thats fine then, youre entitled to your beliefs"
Reads more like a parable than a joke.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Wheras I dont get why anyone would parade the Palestine one
-
- Posts: 910
- Been liked: 219 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
XKhammer wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 23:35Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 22:20XKhammer wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 21:16 Quite a few of my friends went on the march yesterday and l support it in principle but didn't go for 3 reasons
1) West Ham playing spuds and l fancied pie and mash plus few pints before game
2)l don't like Tommy Robinson or support him in politics,but he did do good exposing the grooming gangs
3)Really would get the hump if l did go and ended up next to a moron like Icke,ThickClit or Oxbore spouting conspiracy theorist insane bollocksFirst time i missed a west ham and spurs game.
what don't you like about TR or his politics?
what conspiracy theoriesI'm a Reform/Farage supporter and TR breaks the law and a convicted criminal plus he thinks he's above the law civil and criminal
Also he's a thug and his image doesn't help
You didn't go because you knew what would happen to you once you were outted as a raspberry raping nonce.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I seen a couple of videos where the protesters ran some lads with Israeli flags, fair play to them, but I don’t get why so many English are waving that flag anyway?
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 775
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 119 times
- Been liked: 202 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 20:47 Headline in Guardian online
Britain will ‘never surrender flag’ to far-right protesters, Starmer says.
I gave up counting the use of the term far right about half way through, The whole article seems to have been written by Antifa public relations.
The coverage is similar in the DT and the Mail.
Makes you think, eh!
Makes you think, eh!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 22:20XKhammer wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 21:16 Quite a few of my friends went on the march yesterday and l support it in principle but didn't go for 3 reasons
1) West Ham playing spuds and l fancied pie and mash plus few pints before game
2)l don't like Tommy Robinson or support him in politics,but he did do good exposing the grooming gangs
3)Really would get the hump if l did go and ended up next to a moron like Icke,ThickClit or Oxbore spouting conspiracy theorist insane bollocksFirst time i missed a west ham and spurs game.
what don't you like about TR or his politics?
what conspiracy theories
I'm a Reform/Farage supporter and TR breaks the law and a convicted criminal plus he thinks he's above the law civil and criminal
Also he's a thug and his image doesn't help
Also he's a thug and his image doesn't help
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 22:54The violence that ensued seems to have only been witnessed by the Metropolitan Police.
Odd.
Plod marched us right next to the far left fascists, and when you get them shouting their usual tripe "racists" "fascists" etc what man is gonna sit back and take it.
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 775
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 119 times
- Been liked: 202 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The violence that ensued seems to have only been witnessed by the Metropolitan Police.
Odd.
Odd.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
XKhammer wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 21:16 Quite a few of my friends went on the march yesterday and l support it in principle but didn't go for 3 reasons
1) West Ham playing spuds and l fancied pie and mash plus few pints before game
2)l don't like Tommy Robinson or support him in politics,but he did do good exposing the grooming gangs
3)Really would get the hump if l did go and ended up next to a moron like Icke,ThickClit or Oxbore spouting conspiracy theorist insane bollocks
First time i missed a west ham and spurs game.
what don't you like about TR or his politics?
what conspiracy theories
what don't you like about TR or his politics?
what conspiracy theories
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Quite a few of my friends went on the march yesterday and l support it in principle but didn't go for 3 reasons
1) West Ham playing spuds and l fancied pie and mash plus few pints before game
2)l don't like Tommy Robinson or support him in politics,but he did do good exposing the grooming gangs
3)Really would get the hump if l did go and ended up next to a moron like Icke,ThickClit or Oxbore spouting conspiracy theorist insane bollocks
1) West Ham playing spuds and l fancied pie and mash plus few pints before game
2)l don't like Tommy Robinson or support him in politics,but he did do good exposing the grooming gangs
3)Really would get the hump if l did go and ended up next to a moron like Icke,ThickClit or Oxbore spouting conspiracy theorist insane bollocks
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4720
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 588 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 20:47 Headline in Guardian online
Britain will ‘never surrender flag’ to far-right protesters, Starmer says.
I gave up counting the use of the term far right about half way through, The whole article seems to have been written by Antifa public relations.
Britian (the state) surrendered the flag decades ago. Only themselves to blame.
-
- Posts: 525
- Has liked: 269 times
- Been liked: 287 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Headline in Guardian online
Britain will ‘never surrender flag’ to far-right protesters, Starmer says.
I gave up counting the use of the term far right about half way through, The whole article seems to have been written by Antifa public relations.
Britain will ‘never surrender flag’ to far-right protesters, Starmer says.
I gave up counting the use of the term far right about half way through, The whole article seems to have been written by Antifa public relations.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4720
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 588 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I guess the next step is simultaneous similar marches in the 10 biggest towns & cities of the UK to allow all those who couldn't get down to London a chance to show their own depth of feelings.
-
- Posts: 2253
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 505 times
- Been liked: 760 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Comma.
You said I was trying to find equivalence between the deaths of Floyd and Kirk. I did no such thing, I was talking about the REACTION to the respective killings.
Sven, you're starting to sound like Kirk had it coming, like he deserved to get his throat torn out because some found his views unacceptable. Care to confirm where you actually stand in this?
I keep hearing that Starmer is a seriously clever bloke. Well every time he mentions the ( imaginary) far right he makes himself look just a little more bit more stupid. Hopefully, he has loads more embarrsment to come when more of the content of Mandlesons correspondence with Epstein are revealed.
You said I was trying to find equivalence between the deaths of Floyd and Kirk. I did no such thing, I was talking about the REACTION to the respective killings.
Sven, you're starting to sound like Kirk had it coming, like he deserved to get his throat torn out because some found his views unacceptable. Care to confirm where you actually stand in this?
I keep hearing that Starmer is a seriously clever bloke. Well every time he mentions the ( imaginary) far right he makes himself look just a little more bit more stupid. Hopefully, he has loads more embarrsment to come when more of the content of Mandlesons correspondence with Epstein are revealed.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Looks like Tommy’s little gathering was anything but little. Looks like there were plenty of disgruntled people who felt it necessary to make the effort. Just think how many there are who couldn’t or didn’t make it.
All this talk by those on the left that everything is fine and it’s just racists being racist looks to be way off point.
The next election, whenever it happens is gonna be a landslide.
Not gonna be easy to get them all deported, Gonna be dirty work. Can’t see anything but absolute chaos on the horizon to be honest.
saying that we are gonna see chaos if we do or we don’t. One things for sure things can’t be allowed to continue in their current state.
Starmer should be banished from the UK once his Gov’t falls.
All this talk by those on the left that everything is fine and it’s just racists being racist looks to be way off point.
The next election, whenever it happens is gonna be a landslide.
Not gonna be easy to get them all deported, Gonna be dirty work. Can’t see anything but absolute chaos on the horizon to be honest.
saying that we are gonna see chaos if we do or we don’t. One things for sure things can’t be allowed to continue in their current state.
Starmer should be banished from the UK once his Gov’t falls.
-
- Posts: 2225
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 81 times
- Been liked: 451 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
He didn’t criticise the Notting Hill carnival though 
-
- Posts: 1174
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 275 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 08:20
Jaan
All of Kirk’s views & outpourings have been reported via his podcasts/tiktok/public events etc
Are you saying he has been misrepresented in his views on gays, the role of women, blacks, the intelligence of blacks , the importance of gun ownership & the insignificance of deaths caused etc etc
Appears a bit ironic that he has been killed by a gun loving son of Trump fanatics for not being extreme enough. Despite the killer having a trans ‘room mate’.
Yes he was clearly misrepresented by a left wing echo chamber in an effort to destroy his character and growing reputation, which ultimately lead to his assassination that many on the left have since celebrated.
You've gone from 'no-one deserves to die for their beliefs' to endless posts focusing on his character as if he did deserve it, and repeatedly claimed the far right were responsible when all reports suggest the murderer was radicalised in left wing ideology, was part of Antifa discord groups and had a trans gender partner.
Have a day off.
You've gone from 'no-one deserves to die for their beliefs' to endless posts focusing on his character as if he did deserve it, and repeatedly claimed the far right were responsible when all reports suggest the murderer was radicalised in left wing ideology, was part of Antifa discord groups and had a trans gender partner.
Have a day off.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Starmer has not criticised the march instead he has criticised the violence that ensued. And note how the Musk criticises our government for curbing free speech at an event where he was freely allowed to speak live from his American bunker.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4720
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 588 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 15:32 Starmer criticising yesterdays march.
less arrests than at the Notting Hill Carnival, will he condemn that?
MSM are doing the same - can't report on the 100,000 strong attendance without referring to the 25 ( 0.025% of the crowd if my maths still works) arrests and violence against the police.
What were the arrests at football yesterday? Anybody know? MSM reporting that too?
What were the arrests at football yesterday? Anybody know? MSM reporting that too?