Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

No to Digital ID

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
riosleftsock
Posts: 1778
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 343 times
Been liked: 110 times

No to Digital ID

Post riosleftsock »

User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3724
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 713 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Lee Trundle »

You've got to be a right DIVVY to think this will in any way stop illegal immigration into this country.

Thanks for stepping up to the plate, joyo.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3536
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 455 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Fauxstralian »

The Digital ID will be required to prove your right to work
You won’t be required to produce it in the street or use to verify your identity in any other website etc. 
You can continue to provide your utility bills or passport for those purposes 
Presume every employer will be asked to confirm they have sighted the ID

Social media already has all that information & that Zuckerberg bloke with the Harpo Marx hairstyle has already handed that to Trump so he can get you sacked if you were mean about that Christian nut Charles Kirk
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4676
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 571 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

This 100% will NOT stop or deter illegal immigration because the ability to work in the UK is not the reason people are flocking uncontrolled into the UK.

If an illegal wants to work cash-in hand, and somebody wants to pay him cash-in-hand, that will continue at exactly the same rate as pre-ID card levels; plenty of replacements available from the constantly arriving stream when one gets caught.

The main (and probably only) reason those people come here is on account that they know (KNOW) they will get taken care of during their time here, permanent or otherwise. A.K.A UK, tax-payer funded benefits.

What will 100% stop illegals (so photogenically) coming over in flotillas of small boats?

That has the simplest possible solution: rejoin the EU, or at least the customs union.

Once that is done the illegals will simply revert back to travelling in/on/under unchecked trailers, trucks and trains.

Of course, it won't actually stop or reduce the numbers flooding in - we the taxpayers - just won't be able to see the evidence, and the state will never, ever, get a handle on how many people are in the country and therefor know how to plan, design, and deliver the infrastructure needed to help support those people here and underpin the British way of life..
Pub Bigot
Posts: 703
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 863 times
Been liked: 323 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Pub Bigot »

Nearly 570k signatures at the time of writing, so that’s something. Put as much pressure on that bent cսnt Starmer as possible. 
BerlingtonBertie
Posts: 134
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post BerlingtonBertie »

A waste of money - they will balls it up too - when does a UK government get anything right. Third world nation
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3536
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 455 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Fauxstralian »

Legal immigrants should not be eligible for social security for 5 years after they post a £20,000 bond when arriving 

 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3536
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 455 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Fauxstralian »

It simply takes passing legislation that says anyone who is in France is in a safe country and if they enter the UK without permission they aren’t refugees or migrants
They should be intercepted & returned 
Anyone returned should be banned from entering the UK by any means permanently 

The Tories had 14 years to do this
 
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 846
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 493 times
Been liked: 326 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 20:58
Exactly. All they have to do is pass a law saying anyone here illegal isn’t eligible for any benefits or housing and will be immediately deported.

it’s bizarre anyone would think they want to clamp down on it when they won’t even go after the companies in the Uk that employ illegals.
 
 
Fucking outrageous.
Sick cսnt, spouting utter common sense!😉
Dirty Den
Posts: 1
Been liked: 2 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Dirty Den »

The Dublin accord didn't work, hence why people voted brexit out of frustration.

​​​​​​https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefi ... lin-system
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1173
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

only1billybonds wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 20:17 XK.

They've had years to stop the illegals, if they really wanted to end illegal immigration they would have done so by now.
Exactly. All they have to do is pass a law saying anyone here illegal isn’t eligible for any benefits or housing and will be immediately deported.

it’s bizarre anyone would think they want to clamp down on it when they won’t even go after the companies in the Uk that employ illegals.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5556
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3245 times
Been liked: 1606 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Massive Attack »

XKhammer wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 20:04 Fuck me what bunch of snowflakes suffering from paranoia 
Hopefully this will help stop the illegals and other scumbags on benefit fraud etc 
Like it has in Germany?
riosleftsock
Posts: 1778
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 343 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post riosleftsock »

Mike, the digital infrastructure was all put in place during covid.  It was rejigged and renamed as Gov.Uk One Login last march by the DGS (digital govt services) which was formed by Camerons govt along with the Behavioural Insights Team.  None of this is being directed by a government minister but is under the control of the Cabinet Office
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1761
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 287 times
Been liked: 194 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post zebthecat »

only1billybonds wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 20:17 XK.

They've had years to stop the illegals, if they really wanted to end illegal immigration they would have done so by now.
They could rejoin the Dublin Accord arrangements for starters.
Access to the fingerprint database that comes with that would have been bloody useful as you can trace immigrants journey including rejected asylum claims elsewhere and reject and deport them forthwith. The data is literally at someone's finger tip.
Lack of access to this data is one of the major pull factors for people ending up here.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2228
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 490 times
Been liked: 743 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post only1billybonds »

XK.

They've had years to stop the illegals, if they really wanted to end illegal immigration they would have done so by now.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1761
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 287 times
Been liked: 194 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post zebthecat »

No way am I ever having a Home Office app on my phone.
XKhammer
Posts: 961
Has liked: 578 times
Been liked: 167 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

Fuck me what bunch of snowflakes suffering from paranoia 
Hopefully this will help stop the illegals and other scumbags on benefit fraud etc 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3536
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 455 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Fauxstralian »

I’m in favour 
Believe if you buy more than 3 steaks for a bbq they will shut down your bank account & pull your ears off with pliers 
If it stops smoke drifting into my flat I’m right behind it 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4676
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 571 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Ceasar wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 19:30 666 the number of the beast!
999 - the number answered least.
Ceasar
Posts: 99
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 8 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Ceasar »

666 the number of the beast!
Pub Bigot
Posts: 703
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 863 times
Been liked: 323 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Pub Bigot »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 25 Sep 2025, 19:26 Apparently they're pulling back together the team that worked on HS2 to rollout the physical infrastructure design and installation, and have asked the MoD to handle data access and security.
It’s a simple case of resist. This shady little twat will
not be in government for long, and an early election will happen. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4676
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 571 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Apparently they're pulling back together the team that worked on HS2 to rollout the physical infrastructure design and installation, and have asked the MoD to handle data access and security.
Vexed
Posts: 1116
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 259 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Vexed »

Starmer is an absolute fucking calamity for this country. Fuck this and fuck all you snivelling cunts that voted for him. 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1512
Has liked: 374 times
Been liked: 609 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Far Cough UKunt »

No to having your cards marked.

Sieg Heil!
Post Reply