Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Boxing

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Nutsin
Posts: 2673
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 283 times

Boxing

Post Nutsin »

Fights that would have had a different outcome if both fighters were in their prime.

I’ll go Hagler v Leonard and Tyson v Hollyfield.

Who you got?
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1360
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 469 times

Re: Boxing

Post southbankbornnbred »

Nutsin wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 16:02
Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:45
southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:16 I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.

He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.

Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.

Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.
Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.

Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else. 
 
I think Razor Ruddock was the best fighter Tyson faced when he was in his prime. 
Holyfield did too many Roids but I will give him his respect he had heart and a great chin, his fights with Bowe were some of the most brutal rounds of boxing I’ve seen.

A prime Duran beat up a prime Leonard as Did Tommy Hearns.

Leonard ducked Hagler for years before they fought. Haglers fights with Hearns and Mugabi prove to me he was the best of the four kings.
Good point - forgot about Ruddock. Although he had some big flaws, too.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1360
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 469 times

Re: Boxing

Post southbankbornnbred »

Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:45
southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:16 I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.

He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.

Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.

Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.
Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.

Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else. 
Yeah, I think that’s probably a fair assessment, CS.
Nutsin
Posts: 2673
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 283 times

Re: Boxing

Post Nutsin »

Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:45
southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:16 I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.

He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.

Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.

Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.
Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.

Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else. 
 
 
I think Razor Ruddock was the best fighter Tyson faced when he was in his prime. 
Holyfield did too many Roids but I will give him his respect he had heart and a great chin, his fights with Bowe were some of the most brutal rounds of boxing I’ve seen.

A prime Duran beat up a prime Leonard as Did Tommy Hearns.

Leonard ducked Hagler for years before they fought. Haglers fights with Hearns and Mugabi prove to me he was the best of the four kings.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1780
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 302 times
Been liked: 204 times

Re: Boxing

Post zebthecat »

The frist tine I remember Tyson looking vulnerable was when Frank Bruno wobbled him badly.
Sadly Big Frank was not a good enough boxer to follow that up but it did show that Tyson could be hurt.
Council Scum
Posts: 562
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 200 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 14:16 I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.

He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.

Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.

Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.
Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.

Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else. 
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1360
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 469 times

Re: Boxing

Post southbankbornnbred »

I was shit, btw!
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1360
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 469 times

Re: Boxing

Post southbankbornnbred »

I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.

He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.

Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.

Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5719
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3317 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

Tyson wouldn't stand a chance with Usyk. Wouldn't be able to catch him with his footwork.
Swiss.
Posts: 1766
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 261 times
Been liked: 323 times

Re: Boxing

Post Swiss. »

Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 09:15 Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 
SRL best pound for pound boxer for me. Tyson was a brawler. Put him in the ring with a technically better boxer with a decent chin i.e, Holyfield and he was out classed,
Massive Attack
Posts: 5719
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3317 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

He got beat up by Buster Douglas and couldn't hold a candle to either Holyfield or Lewis.
Council Scum
Posts: 562
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 200 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Mr Anon" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 11:14
Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 09:15 Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 
incredibly unfair in Tyson IMO, he was technically great too, especially defensively, he destroyed almost everyone, Ali lost in his prime too
When Ali was in his prime he was denied the right to fight for 3 years, we never got to see Ali in his true prime. 

Tyson beat who, who did he beat that was worthy of ranking in a whose who of boxing? Where is his Fraser, his Foreman, his Liston? He doesn't even have Norton on his list. and Holmes would have toyed with him in his prime. 

Tyson beat a load of bums, His pro debut was against a middleweight. Biggest myth in boxing. 
Massive Attack
Posts: 5719
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3317 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 09:15 Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 

Agreed. Tyson was good for a spell but overrated overall up against the very best. 
Mr Anon
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: Boxing

Post Mr Anon »

Mr Anon" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 11:14
Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 09:15 Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 
incredibly unfair on Tyson IMO, he was technically great too, especially defensively, he destroyed almost everyone, Ali lost in his prime too
 
Mr Anon
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 173 times

Re: Boxing

Post Mr Anon »

Council Scum" wrote: 13 Oct 2025, 09:15 Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 
incredibly unfair in Tyson IMO, he was technically great too, especially defensively, he destroyed almost everyone, Ali lost in his prime too
John Drake
Posts: 136
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Boxing

Post John Drake »

The problem with taking too many blows to the head is that it makes it impossible to distinguish between the Football Forum and Off Topic threads
Council Scum
Posts: 562
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 200 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Prime Tyson is a myth for Fanboys only. Tyson was a bully, Holyfield was one of the hardest men to ever put on a pair of gloves. 

Leonard beats any version of Hagler, Christ Leonard had fought once in 5 years and Hagler hadn't lost in 11 years, if anyone wasn't in their prime its Leonard.

Holmes destroys Tyson in his prime if you want a proper example. 
zico
Posts: 4342
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: Boxing

Post zico »

Not sure the outcomes would have been different but would certainly have been interesting to have seen Lewis against a prime Tyson and Nigel Benn at his best in the two fights against Steve Collins.  That goes for Eubank as well to be fair.
Post Reply