AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Who
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: The Who
no, they can charge what they like while divs keep filling the arenas. most I spent was back in 2012 on radiohead. £70 for standing, fairly close to the stage at the o2. the band was as good as I expected, a brilliant show but still spoilt by far too many inconsiderate cunts with their arms constantly outstretched filming the stage. like the black mirror episode where you have all those cunts walking around constantly filming. it spoilt what should have been a 10/10 night. six years later, I went to see sparks in consecutive years for half the price and far fewer amateur cameramen/women
Re: The Who
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑15 Oct 2025, 15:56 nothing against them performing again, despite his voice being gone long ago but bands like the cure manage/ensure to cap prices to make it affordable for fans so there's no excuse for these piss taking amounts
*though, I see even the cure now wanting over 110 for the cheapest tickets available next year. all these legacy bands can fuck off. support rising talent*
I suppose the 'excuse' is that whilst people keep buying them, they have no reason not to keep pushing the prices up. If I was a promoter I would be annoyed if I sold a ticket for £50 and a tout then sold it on for £100. That would be £50 potential revenue lost.
The hard-nosed view would be that if you have 100,000 tickets to sell, you are pricing at the point where you will sell 100,000 tickets to those willing to pay the most, not the 'average' punter.
Harsh I know but this is not an industry known for being warm and inclusive...
The hard-nosed view would be that if you have 100,000 tickets to sell, you are pricing at the point where you will sell 100,000 tickets to those willing to pay the most, not the 'average' punter.
Harsh I know but this is not an industry known for being warm and inclusive...
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: The Who
nothing against them performing again, despite his voice being gone long ago but bands like the cure manage/ensure to cap prices to make it affordable for fans so there's no excuse for these piss taking amounts
*though, I see even the cure now wanting over 110 for the cheapest tickets available next year. all these legacy bands can fuck off. support rising talent*
*though, I see even the cure now wanting over 110 for the cheapest tickets available next year. all these legacy bands can fuck off. support rising talent*
Re: The Who
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑15 Oct 2025, 11:40 each to their own, and like the oasis bandwagon/ticket fiasco, I'm not telling people how to spend their money but the prices I've heard being asked for rush tickets is sickening. some reports of close to half a grand for a view from the gods. would love to have finally seen one of my musical heroes (lifeson) live, but for these prices they can fuck off
Blimey now there's a topic in itself.
Not sure how I feel about the Rush thing. Massive fan since 1979 but I admired the standard they set when they (previously) stopped. They did what so few bands do and quit while they were ahead.
Clearly Geddy and Alex should do whatever they want to do. I just hope it doesn't signal (see what I did there) a drop in the very high standards that they set right up to that last gig in LA.
I've talked myself out of going to Toronto to see it, but might be hard to resist if they come to Europe.
Not sure how I feel about the Rush thing. Massive fan since 1979 but I admired the standard they set when they (previously) stopped. They did what so few bands do and quit while they were ahead.
Clearly Geddy and Alex should do whatever they want to do. I just hope it doesn't signal (see what I did there) a drop in the very high standards that they set right up to that last gig in LA.
I've talked myself out of going to Toronto to see it, but might be hard to resist if they come to Europe.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: The Who
each to their own, and like the oasis bandwagon/ticket fiasco, I'm not telling people how to spend their money but the prices I've heard being asked for rush tickets is sickening. some reports of close to half a grand for a view from the gods. would love to have finally seen one of my musical heroes (lifeson) live, but for these prices they can fuck off
Re: The Who
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 20:46 The Who were a great band and had a truly great songwriter, Townshend, and singer, Daltrey.
But their whole sound was defined by their utterly inimitable rhythm section. Losing Moon was bad enough, but when the Ox died they really should have packed it in.
Mind you, if people want to spend a fortune watching an overpriced, geriatric tribute band, that's entirely up to them.
The power of brand names is quite extraordinary. I am also amazed at how many adverts I see for gigs featuring photos of the band taken decades ago. The promoters are actively selling what people remember of a band a long time ago.
I suppose many who buy tickets don't really think carefully enough about what the passage of time will have done to the 'product' that they are buying?
I suppose many who buy tickets don't really think carefully enough about what the passage of time will have done to the 'product' that they are buying?
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 775
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 119 times
- Been liked: 202 times
Re: The Who
The Who were a great band and had a truly great songwriter, Townshend, and singer, Daltrey.
But their whole sound was defined by their utterly inimitable rhythm section. Losing Moon was bad enough, but when the Ox died they really should have packed it in.
Mind you, if people want to spend a fortune watching an overpriced, geriatric tribute band, that's entirely up to them.
But their whole sound was defined by their utterly inimitable rhythm section. Losing Moon was bad enough, but when the Ox died they really should have packed it in.
Mind you, if people want to spend a fortune watching an overpriced, geriatric tribute band, that's entirely up to them.
-
- Posts: 355
- Old WHO Number: 276654
- Has liked: 204 times
- Been liked: 46 times
-
- Posts: 132
- Old WHO Number: 10135
- Has liked: 53 times
- Been liked: 59 times
Re: The Who
Swiss. wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025, 10:42MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 18:07 Quadrophenia is the absolute bollocks of an album, The film version is very good, but the original version is vastly superior.
I think the album is terrible except The Real Me.
Listen to this shite,
Re: The Who
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 18:07 Quadrophenia is the absolute bollocks of an album, The film version is very good, but the original version is vastly superior.
I think the album is terrible except The Real Me.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1550
- Has liked: 380 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: The Who
Bungo wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 18:47Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 17:55 By coincidence, I was (half) listening to a segment of Bob Dylan's Theme Time Radio show and he was talking about The Who.
Apparently they did a "Farewell Tour" back just before Who's Next...and then a tour every few years after that.
So, bye, then.I still remember Status Quo's 'End Of The Road' tour in 1984 (I think).
Possibly the earliest false retirement from touring ever!
Won't Get Fooled Again, comes to mind.
Re: The Who
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 17:55 By coincidence, I was (half) listening to a segment of Bob Dylan's Theme Time Radio show and he was talking about The Who.
Apparently they did a "Farewell Tour" back just before Who's Next...and then a tour every few years after that.
So, bye, then.
I still remember Status Quo's 'End Of The Road' tour in 1984 (I think).
Possibly the earliest false retirement from touring ever!
Possibly the earliest false retirement from touring ever!
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 863
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 336 times
Re: The Who
Quadrophenia is the absolute bollocks of an album, The film version is very good, but the original version is vastly superior.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4720
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 588 times
Re: The Who
By coincidence, I was (half) listening to a segment of Bob Dylan's Theme Time Radio show and he was talking about The Who.
Apparently they did a "Farewell Tour" back just before Who's Next...and then a tour every few years after that.
So, bye, then.
Apparently they did a "Farewell Tour" back just before Who's Next...and then a tour every few years after that.
So, bye, then.
- easthammer
- Posts: 2607
- Old WHO Number: 15731
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 139 times
Re: The Who
Had the original Whos Next album loved the cover - recently passed it to one of my son-in-laws with all my vinyl
This track is definitely one of their best.
-
- Posts: 562
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 200 times
Re: The Who
Eastside surge" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 05:44 Pete’s book must be due out soon mustn’t it you know the one he was doing the “research “for when the old bill arrested him?
it came out in 2012
-
- Posts: 445
- Old WHO Number: 17468
- Has liked: 125 times
- Been liked: 101 times
-
- Posts: 445
- Old WHO Number: 17468
- Has liked: 125 times
- Been liked: 101 times