AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Boxing
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 944
- Has liked: 143 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: Boxing
I never said easily, I loved Calzaghe as a fighter, not taking anything away from him. He was brilliant, and in their primes, would've been a great fight, but only one winner at the end for me.
RJJ could be the most talented boxer that ever laced up a pair of gloves, up until he fucked about with the weights, he was ridiculous, Toney & Hopkins in their prime vs Lacy & Kessler?
Both great fighters, but what Massive is doing here trying to diminish RJJ is silly.
RJJ could be the most talented boxer that ever laced up a pair of gloves, up until he fucked about with the weights, he was ridiculous, Toney & Hopkins in their prime vs Lacy & Kessler?
Both great fighters, but what Massive is doing here trying to diminish RJJ is silly.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: Boxing
no one would ever have easily beat calzaghe. people forgot joe was also well past his prime, with fucked hands
-
- Posts: 944
- Has liked: 143 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: Boxing
A four weight World Champion, long time no.1 P4P when active, had a glass jaw, and wasn't as good as he thought he was.
Interesting take.
Interesting take.
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Boxing
It'll be interesting when Usyk finally bows out. Another impressive undefeated long career and at 38yo still wants to have 2 or 3 more fights. He could be another that bows out unblemished and go down as a great of Boxing with all his achievements. Could be Wardley next if he manages to connect with Parker with his devastating power..
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
Re: Boxing
RJJ went on for WAY too long and ruined what was a very decent record, losing to Maccarinelli for example.
Prime RJJ probably easily beats a prime Calzaghe, but for me the better fighter/boxer knows when to leave the sport even if they're on top.
That's why I really rate the likes of Calzaghe, and Lennox Lewis. Possibly higher than they should be.
Prime RJJ probably easily beats a prime Calzaghe, but for me the better fighter/boxer knows when to leave the sport even if they're on top.
That's why I really rate the likes of Calzaghe, and Lennox Lewis. Possibly higher than they should be.
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Boxing
He was also a classless twat who could have done some serious damage to Griffin with his totally unnecessary followed up when he went down on 1 knee that led to his disqualification against him and his 1st ever loss.
He was good but he weren't anywhere near as good as he thought he was as you rightly point out regarding the two losses to Tarver eitherside of his Johnson knockout. Geezer had a glass jaw if you could get to him.
He was good but he weren't anywhere near as good as he thought he was as you rightly point out regarding the two losses to Tarver eitherside of his Johnson knockout. Geezer had a glass jaw if you could get to him.
-
- Posts: 944
- Has liked: 143 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: Boxing
You've picked out a fight when he was past his best after moving up the weights ffs 
He should have retired after the 1st Tarver fight, but anyway, I'm not gonna spend the day debating how good RJJ was, if you don't know, you don't know.
He should have retired after the 1st Tarver fight, but anyway, I'm not gonna spend the day debating how good RJJ was, if you don't know, you don't know.
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Boxing
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑15 Oct 2025, 07:43 Go and watch some footage of him in his prime.
Calzaghe was a fantastic fighter, but fought his best 2 opponents when they were well past their best. His best wins against fighters in their prime were Lacy & Kessler, not taking anything away from him, but RJJ was one of the the best all time pound for pound fighters, he just wasn't the same once he moved up to the big weights later on.
Calzaghe spent his whole career at Super Middle, only fought twice at a different weight, both in those last 2 fights, got put down in both, and the Hopkins fight (who was 43 at the time) was a close call, watch it again. But he certainly was a great fighter, no doubt.
I've followed his fights ever since he deservedly beat Eubank in 97 and been thoroughly impressed with him ever since. Roy Jones fumbled his record with getting sparked out by Glen Johnson (we should never have sold him to Liverpool!). Steve Collins even bottled fighting Calzaghe in the end even though Calzaghe was keen for it to happen.
-
- Posts: 944
- Has liked: 143 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: Boxing
Go and watch some footage of him in his prime.
Calzaghe was a fantastic fighter, but fought his best 2 opponents when they were well past their best. His best wins against fighters in their prime were Lacy & Kessler, not taking anything away from him, but RJJ was one of the the best all time pound for pound fighters, he just wasn't the same once he moved up to the big weights later on.
Calzaghe spent his whole career at Super Middle, only fought twice at a different weight, both in those last 2 fights, got put down in both, and the Hopkins fight (who was 43 at the time) was a close call, watch it again. But he certainly was a great fighter, no doubt.
Calzaghe was a fantastic fighter, but fought his best 2 opponents when they were well past their best. His best wins against fighters in their prime were Lacy & Kessler, not taking anything away from him, but RJJ was one of the the best all time pound for pound fighters, he just wasn't the same once he moved up to the big weights later on.
Calzaghe spent his whole career at Super Middle, only fought twice at a different weight, both in those last 2 fights, got put down in both, and the Hopkins fight (who was 43 at the time) was a close call, watch it again. But he certainly was a great fighter, no doubt.
-
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: Boxing
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 21:30 Prime Roy Jones Jnr beats any version of Calzaghe, for me.
My personal favourite fighter to watch, should've retired after the 1st Tarver fight.
Not for me. I like Roy Jones but Calzaghe would have still done him at any time only 3 years younger himself when he did Jones in his backyard at Madison Square. His undefeated record beating him whilst retiring at the top is an amazing career that very few can match.
Re: Boxing
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 21:39 No mention of Herol Graham on this thread?
Surprised.
I like CS's opinion of boxers, knows what he's talking about, subjective or not.
What's your opinion of him fella? VERY unlucky to be caught by THAT puch from Jackson.
That was an absolute killer.
All he had to do was see the round and the ref was going to stop Jackson.
What a punch.
I liked Kirkand Laing but was his own worst enemy. He dominated Coiln Jones twice and punched him on the nuts and made him angry.
Beating Roberto Duran against massive odds and then going on a year long bender was peak Laing.
All he had to do was see the round and the ref was going to stop Jackson.
What a punch.
I liked Kirkand Laing but was his own worst enemy. He dominated Coiln Jones twice and punched him on the nuts and made him angry.
Beating Roberto Duran against massive odds and then going on a year long bender was peak Laing.
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 863
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 500 times
- Been liked: 336 times
Re: Boxing
No mention of Herol Graham on this thread?
Surprised.
I like CS's opinion of boxers, knows what he's talking about, subjective or not.
What's your opinion of him fella? VERY unlucky to be caught by THAT puch from Jackson.
Surprised.
I like CS's opinion of boxers, knows what he's talking about, subjective or not.
What's your opinion of him fella? VERY unlucky to be caught by THAT puch from Jackson.
-
- Posts: 944
- Has liked: 143 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: Boxing
Prime Roy Jones Jnr beats any version of Calzaghe, for me.
My personal favourite fighter to watch, should've retired after the 1st Tarver fight.
My personal favourite fighter to watch, should've retired after the 1st Tarver fight.
Re: Boxing
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 17:25 hard to pick best lists because styles appeal to different people. I hated watching mayweather, but millions loved his evasive style. if I had to name fighters I loved watching, my top five would be calzaghe, hagler, hearns, benn, mccallum.
but also loved usyk, mugabe, golovkin, carl thompson, azumah nelson, mcguigan, andries, roldan
I agree I never enjoyed Mayweathers fights either.
Benn, Hearns, Hagler, Tyson and Gatti fights were always entertaining. Also some of the Mexican fighters were warriors, Marquez, Morales, Costillo all put on a show. The Costillo v Coralles fight was one to remember.
Benn, Hearns, Hagler, Tyson and Gatti fights were always entertaining. Also some of the Mexican fighters were warriors, Marquez, Morales, Costillo all put on a show. The Costillo v Coralles fight was one to remember.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: Boxing
haha, he made one of the funniest ringwalks ever when he went to the ring on a magic carpet
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1550
- Has liked: 380 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: Boxing
Didn't see this bloke in his prime but that Prince Naseem, was a massive helmet wasn't he?
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3396
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 783 times
- Been liked: 1172 times
Re: Boxing
hard to pick best lists because styles appeal to different people. I hated watching mayweather, but millions loved his evasive style. if I had to name fighters I loved watching, my top five would be calzaghe, hagler, hearns, benn, mccallum.
but also loved usyk, mugabe, golovkin, carl thompson, azumah nelson, mcguigan, andries, roldan
but also loved usyk, mugabe, golovkin, carl thompson, azumah nelson, mcguigan, andries, roldan
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
Re: Boxing
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 15:42 I remember when Patrick Vieira spat at Ruddock and he said it reeked of garlic.*
Wrong Ruddock?*
By the way Hagler is the best ever fighter for me apart from Muhammad that is.
I'll have to correct you there, only because what I think he said was funnier.
After asking if Viera had hit him after he flobbed at him, Ruddock's reply (I thought) was "No, but it was close enough to smell the garlic".
After asking if Viera had hit him after he flobbed at him, Ruddock's reply (I thought) was "No, but it was close enough to smell the garlic".
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1550
- Has liked: 380 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: Boxing
Randy Turpin beat the legend that was Sugar Ray but lost in the rematch. Another boxer that beat Sugar Ray was Terry Downes but Sugar Ray was on his way out by then, as Downes said he beat the ghost of Sugar Ray Robinson
Wally Downes is related to Terry Downes.
Wally Downes is related to Terry Downes.
Re: Boxing
My earliest memory of boxing is listening with my Dad and Grandad to the world title bout between Turpin and Sugar Ray at Earls Court back in 1951. Since then I have had many boxing heroes, not all of them were serial winners, but right now I cannot think of ever holding anyone at a greater level of esteem than I have for Usyk.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1550
- Has liked: 380 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: Boxing
I remember when Patrick Vieira spat at Ruddock and he said it reeked of garlic.*
Wrong Ruddock?*
By the way Hagler is the best ever fighter for me apart from Muhammad that is.
Wrong Ruddock?*
By the way Hagler is the best ever fighter for me apart from Muhammad that is.
Re: Boxing
Council Scum" wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 08:33Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 16:02Council Scum" wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 14:45Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.
Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else.I think Razor Ruddock was the best fighter Tyson faced when he was in his prime.
Holyfield did too many Roids but I will give him his respect he had heart and a great chin, his fights with Bowe were some of the most brutal rounds of boxing I’ve seen.
A prime Duran beat up a prime Leonard as Did Tommy Hearns.
Leonard ducked Hagler for years before they fought. Haglers fights with Hearns and Mugabi prove to me he was the best of the four kings.Ruddock was just an average heavy, who were his best wins against? A washed up Bonecrusher?
A prime Duran also lost to Leonard, as Leonard fought the right fight in the rematch, the sign of a great champion.
earns didn't beat Leonard, he got stopped. Probably best you know about the subject matter if you are going to make claims on it.
I loved Hagler, for me the greatest middle of all time, but he fought Duran, Leonard and Hearns at his weight, not theirs.
I disagree with you about Ruddock, he could fight and he could hit.
I think you’ll find Hearns fought Leonard twice, First fight Leonard caught him late on after Hearns was putting on a show and was ahead on points on all 3 judges scorecards, the second fight Hearns put Leonard on the canvas 3 times and they called it a draw. A complete travesty of a decision. Even Leonard admitted later on that “Tommy won that fight.”
As for Hagler fighting at middleweight, everyone knows it’s easier for a fighter to go up in weight than it is for a fighter to go down in weight for a fight. Leonard even said he decided to fight Hagler as he had slowed down and wasn’t as quick as he used to to be.
As for Hagler v Leonard there are plenty of fight fans who think Hagler won that fight but as per the decision went Leonard’s way in Vegas.
I think you’ll find Hearns fought Leonard twice, First fight Leonard caught him late on after Hearns was putting on a show and was ahead on points on all 3 judges scorecards, the second fight Hearns put Leonard on the canvas 3 times and they called it a draw. A complete travesty of a decision. Even Leonard admitted later on that “Tommy won that fight.”
As for Hagler fighting at middleweight, everyone knows it’s easier for a fighter to go up in weight than it is for a fighter to go down in weight for a fight. Leonard even said he decided to fight Hagler as he had slowed down and wasn’t as quick as he used to to be.
As for Hagler v Leonard there are plenty of fight fans who think Hagler won that fight but as per the decision went Leonard’s way in Vegas.
-
- Posts: 562
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 200 times
Re: Boxing
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 16:02Council Scum" wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 14:45southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 14:16 I do think Tyson’s record and reputation is talked-up a little. But he did beat some decent heavyweights.
He beat Holmes convincingly, albeit a long-retired version of Larry Holmes. But he also beat Tucker (previously undefeated) and Bonecrusher Smith, both of whom were canny, tough fuckers who knew their way around the ring.
Do agree that he made a slightly inflated reputation out of battering average champions (by historical standards) in the 80s. But it was enjoyable and exciting to watch! He cleaned up the division and brought audiences back. For a few years, at least.
Did some sparring for a few years in my 20s and 30s (mostly kickboxing, bit of boxing), and have huge respect for anybody who climbs into a ring. Your soul is fucking exposed in there.Smith and Tucker were his two best wins and he struggled with both, they aren't even in a top 100 of heavies.
Tyson was exciting, but ultimately badly exposed. Once people realised if you weren't intimidated, he didn't have anything else.I think Razor Ruddock was the best fighter Tyson faced when he was in his prime.
Holyfield did too many Roids but I will give him his respect he had heart and a great chin, his fights with Bowe were some of the most brutal rounds of boxing I’ve seen.
A prime Duran beat up a prime Leonard as Did Tommy Hearns.
Leonard ducked Hagler for years before they fought. Haglers fights with Hearns and Mugabi prove to me he was the best of the four kings.
Ruddock was just an average heavy, who were his best wins against? A washed up Bonecrusher?
A prime Duran also lost to Leonard, as Leonard fought the right fight in the rematch, the sign of a great champion.
earns didn't beat Leonard, he got stopped. Probably best you know about the subject matter if you are going to make claims on it.
I loved Hagler, for me the greatest middle of all time, but he fought Duran, Leonard and Hearns at his weight, not theirs.
A prime Duran also lost to Leonard, as Leonard fought the right fight in the rematch, the sign of a great champion.
earns didn't beat Leonard, he got stopped. Probably best you know about the subject matter if you are going to make claims on it.
I loved Hagler, for me the greatest middle of all time, but he fought Duran, Leonard and Hearns at his weight, not theirs.