Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2120
Has liked: 561 times
Been liked: 895 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
dealcanvey
Posts: 571
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 107 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post dealcanvey »

Yusuf was only criticising the Tories a few months ago for the secret Afghan asylum leak. Braverman was the home secretary at the time, Jenrick immigration minister.

Shadow cabinet chums now.
,
Posts: 1201
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

With the drift of MPs from the conservatives to Reform we can see that many of those individuals were from the nasty wing of their party. In essence these leavers are helping sanitise Badenoch’s Tory remainers whilst at the same time ensuring that Reform retains its basic nastiness level.

There is now a problem brewing within Reform whereby candidates who stood for them in the last election, and run lots of close calls, are being pushed aside by Farage so that twerps like Rosindell stand. Romford constituency is a case in point where the conservatives are enraged about Rosindell’s defection and the Reformers want to retain their candidate who they canvassed for and nearly won with last time out.

What this undoubtedly shows is that Farage is no different to any other politician in the way he treats people within his party. And incidentally looking at the calibre of these defectors it’s as if Reform were a PL team it is taking the worst, not the best, players from a relegated team.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2120
Has liked: 561 times
Been liked: 895 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

If Reform is going to turn into Tory Lite, what's the fucking point?
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3982
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
 
 
correct, a collective of cunts. led by a tory loving snake oil salesman called nigel. politics, and the state of the self serving pigs in suits, is at an all time low
​​​​​​
only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

ED.

Yea,its a shame the 'big hitters' on the center right couldn't settle their differences and work together to make changes that really matter.
Again,have to agree with you re Rupert Lowe.
In an ideal world, he'd run the show,he has the right blend of common sense and ruthlesness to really make a difference.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Agreed Bill. If I had my way, I'd have Advance UK in, but it's not going to happen. I'm not expecting miracles from Reform, but at the very least some common sense ideas to running the country. Supporting businesses, working people, clearing out the hotels (£53 BILLION a year on security alone FFS) and scrapping Net Zero.

That would be a start.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Its been said before but its worth saying again. 
The BLOB will see to it that whatever policies Reform try to implement, the civil service will find a way of stalling/ignoring them. Any real change will only happen if a sledgehammer approach is taken and a massive clearout takes place.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

goose wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:54 It’s a fine line Reform need to walk here. They’ve very little experience of running a government so will need to bring in people with experience and knowledge. However, bring in too many and risk looking like the Conservative Party V2.
I agree.

I've said many times that I feel it's an election too soon for them to take power. I still feel this even if they bring in people with experience of governing (albeit very badly) the country.

They still need to be getting their undercurrent of direction out to the people/voters and acting on any feedback; they need to be seen as the party that listens because all (ALL) previous governments have demonstrated that they're weapons-grade past-masters at ignoring what the public want and giving what they need the public to want (to keep themselves in power).
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5950
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1060 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

It’s a fine line Reform need to walk here. They’ve very little experience of running a government so will need to bring in people with experience and knowledge. However, bring in too many and risk looking like the Conservative Party V2.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
Depends on whether or not these imports/political immigrants can work within the Reform framework and (political) aims.

I don't thing the general public actually has access to such framework or policies/aims yet, just media speculation on them; speculation from the media that is still spitting feathers about the Brexit outcome.

You can almost taste the fear the traditional party voters have for Reform though, the irony being that it is entirely their fuckeries that brought Reform (or UKIP as it once was) into being in the first place.
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 585
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Nutsin wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 04:51 Fucking hell it stinks of cat piss in here.


 
Yeah. It will be all those insecure people desperate to prove to a bunch of other people they don't actually know they're not wrong - about anything.
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Fucking hell it stinks of cat piss in here.

 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:49 Farage is a Nazi & Tice lives under Sharia law by choice 
As poor as Starmer has been being not a Nazi puts him ahead 
Streeting I understand lives in England so I put him ahead of Tice
As for Truss I think any government minister who has died recently or sustained a brain injury has her covered
 
..." Tice lives under Sharia law by choice"...

What does it matter which law you live under, so long as you respect it and don't (plan to) break it?


Now.The interpretation and implementation of that law at any given time by any dominant subset of the society that has (made) those laws is a different thing.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 1013
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 631 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Seven kids?
Her minge probably resembles a trawlerman’s welly, so it’s a no from me.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3982
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

after seven kids, you'd have to be hung like a shire horse to touch the sides.

that and the desperate dan lantern jaw, it's a big NO for me.
F 129 Row66
Posts: 591
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 323 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post F 129 Row66 »

Serious political question re Reform's mayoral candidate for London.. Leila Cunningham, Would you?
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Salt of the earth and one of us, is old 2 Jags. How is Pauline's Barnet these days..
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 18:40
OK_Guy wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 17:06 I liked Prescott... proper politician.
A lot of them were back then, likeable or not I could name many politicians pre 2000s with three words to describe them all, try doing that now with anyone outside the main party leaders 
Weak, woke, wankers.

There you go, just done 95% of the commons.
Hammer I am
Posts: 391
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

OK_Guy wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 17:06 I liked Prescott... proper politician.
A lot of them were back then, likeable or not I could name many politicians pre 2000s with three words to describe them all, try doing that now with anyone outside the main party leaders 
OK_Guy
Posts: 233
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 349 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

I liked Prescott... proper politician.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 16:48 =12.35px"Take John Prescott, John like Nigel was charismatic and people generally liked him so he got away with lamping a member of the public."

That member of the public deserved to get lamped. 
 
 
He did but that's neither here nor there, holding the position he did at the time he should have eaten a copious amount of shit for it.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 16:48 =12.35px"Take John Prescott, John like Nigel was charismatic and people generally liked him so he got away with lamping a member of the public."

That member of the public deserved to get lamped. 

Just for that mullet alone!
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

=12.35px"Take John Prescott, John like Nigel was charismatic and people generally liked him so he got away with lamping a member of the public."

That member of the public deserved to get lamped. 
Post Reply