Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1243
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 252 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2683
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 170 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post easthammer »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
Whilst I have always thought that PR was desirable from the point of view of improved democracy, if this AI assessment is anywhere near true, I don't think it will bring about better government.

This is what AI assess would have been the outcome had the last election been under pr

Key Changes to the Political Landscape
  • End of One-Party Rule: Under almost all PR models, Labour would have won approximately 219 to 228 seats, far short of a majority. A "progressive" coalition including Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens would likely have been the most viable governing option.
  • Surge for Smaller Parties: Reform UK and the Green Party would have seen the most dramatic gains. Reform UK would have increased from 5 seats to roughly 90–100 seats, while the Greens would have jumped from 4 to over 60 seats.
  • Stronger Official Opposition: The Conservatives would have remained the second-largest party with approximately 139–148 seats. Under some specific projections, they might have even been closely rivaled by Reform UK for the role of primary opposition.
  • Shift in Regional Power: The SNP would have nearly doubled its seat count from 9 to 16 or 18 seats, while Plaid Cymru would have maintained or slightly increased its representation.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5955
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1062 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
Mr Anon
Posts: 829
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 199 times
Been liked: 226 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

can't say any mention of it but that latest ICE killing looks look an execution in cold blood
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 586
Has liked: 341 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Westside wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 15:41
, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
Yes, I wish we had had one. It would be much better than that referendum on switching to AV, a watered down and complicated version of first past the post, that we had in 2011.
OK_Guy
Posts: 233
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

how the Lib-Dems betrayed their values when they teamed-up with the Tories, especially Nick Clegg... another 'nose in the troth' cսnt, went on to earn multi-millions with Meta/Facebook.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5301
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 726 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:59 Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
 
 
We KNOW the current lot are not fit to govern under the Labour party mandate (through experience). We KNOW the previous lot are not fit to govern under the Tory party mandate (through experience). 

We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
Westside
Posts: 1207
Old WHO Number: 15592
Has liked: 95 times
Been liked: 129 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westside »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
So you'd like us to move to proportional representation instead of FPTP, Mr Comma? You've kept that quiet 😉

(Of course you'd prefer PR - it's the only way the Lib Dems would get a sniff of power)
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
,
Posts: 1203
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Massive Attack" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:05
Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter



 

🤔

Image
See what I mean?? His head is far too big for his haircut! This man is not right. Makes my jeebs heeb. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5301
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 726 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 
You can smell the fear here, even online. The country NEEDS a change of people and policy in the elected administration.

The state and media will do all they can to prevent that change, but better by far that it happens by ballot, even, if, like Brexit, that ballot doesn't deliver what the state and media hierarchy feel they (and fuck everybody else) "justifiably" are entitled to.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7782
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4526 times
Been liked: 2399 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 

🤔

Image
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter

 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7782
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4526 times
Been liked: 2399 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Principled move by Torbitt who I've long respected for speaking fairly and a lot of the time wirh common sense even though he's on the Left. 

User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 586
Has liked: 341 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

If Reform are going to win this Gorton and Denton by-election, it would probably help if they could find the right fucking place to campaign in! 😂

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/reform-mp-lee ... ccounter=1
Fat, Bald n 50
Posts: 77
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fat, Bald n 50 »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
They're sniffing possible Cabinet jobs in 2029, some will even be considering a challenge to Farage as a lot of people agree with what Reform want to offer but the thought of Farage will push them towards the Greens or Lib Dems.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3990
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1163 times
Been liked: 1521 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 12:21 coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
All of them, ignore the colour of the fucking tie
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2123
Has liked: 563 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
dealcanvey
Posts: 571
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 107 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post dealcanvey »

Yusuf was only criticising the Tories a few months ago for the secret Afghan asylum leak. Braverman was the home secretary at the time, Jenrick immigration minister.

Shadow cabinet chums now.
,
Posts: 1203
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

With the drift of MPs from the conservatives to Reform we can see that many of those individuals were from the nasty wing of their party. In essence these leavers are helping sanitise Badenoch’s Tory remainers whilst at the same time ensuring that Reform retains its basic nastiness level.

There is now a problem brewing within Reform whereby candidates who stood for them in the last election, and run lots of close calls, are being pushed aside by Farage so that twerps like Rosindell stand. Romford constituency is a case in point where the conservatives are enraged about Rosindell’s defection and the Reformers want to retain their candidate who they canvassed for and nearly won with last time out.

What this undoubtedly shows is that Farage is no different to any other politician in the way he treats people within his party. And incidentally looking at the calibre of these defectors it’s as if Reform were a PL team it is taking the worst, not the best, players from a relegated team.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2123
Has liked: 563 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

If Reform is going to turn into Tory Lite, what's the fucking point?
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3990
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1163 times
Been liked: 1521 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
 
 
correct, a collective of cunts. led by a tory loving snake oil salesman called nigel. politics, and the state of the self serving pigs in suits, is at an all time low
​​​​​​
only1billybonds
Posts: 2560
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

ED.

Yea,its a shame the 'big hitters' on the center right couldn't settle their differences and work together to make changes that really matter.
Again,have to agree with you re Rupert Lowe.
In an ideal world, he'd run the show,he has the right blend of common sense and ruthlesness to really make a difference.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Agreed Bill. If I had my way, I'd have Advance UK in, but it's not going to happen. I'm not expecting miracles from Reform, but at the very least some common sense ideas to running the country. Supporting businesses, working people, clearing out the hotels (£53 BILLION a year on security alone FFS) and scrapping Net Zero.

That would be a start.
Post Reply