Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1252
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 256 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
nychammer
Posts: 2169
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 77 times
Been liked: 327 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post nychammer »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 21:07
Nutsin wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:52
zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
give me your illegal alien criminals
your societal outcasts, yearning to live here for free
the generous refuge of a corrupt benefits system galore  (in return for their vote one day)
NO send the gangbangers, drug dealers and rapists back 
and shut the fucking door.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1515
Been liked: 367 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Turk1 wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 19:51 ..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
Superb.

I'd filled him under "wouldn't ask him to babysit".
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 2067
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 192 times
Been liked: 421 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Sydney_Iron »

ICE doing stuff without checking🤣 Thick Cunts...... 

.ICE deported a man charged over the 'largest jewellery heist in US history' before he could face trial - ABC News

A man accused of helping orchestrate a jewellery heist described by authorities as the largest in US history may never face trial.

Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores faced a maximum 15 years in jail if convicted of his alleged role in stealing about $147 million worth of gold, gems and luxury watches in 2022.

Despite prosecutors' efforts to secure a conviction, Mr Flores was detained by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and deported without their knowledge.
 
Nutsin
Posts: 3390
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 235 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 21:07
Nutsin wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:52
zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Kinda odd that it’s only Minnesota that has this chaotic issue with ICE.
Do you think it might have something to do with the state It’s Governor and other elected officials being investigated for massive fraud? 
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2058
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 540 times
Been liked: 314 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

Nutsin wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:52
zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Nutsin
Posts: 3390
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 235 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2058
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 540 times
Been liked: 314 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

Turk1 wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 19:51 ..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
He gives me the creeps.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2058
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 540 times
Been liked: 314 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
Turk1
Posts: 15
Old WHO Number: 314058
Been liked: 3 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Turk1 »

..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
Nutsin
Posts: 3390
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 235 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 18:53 It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
I’d agree with that, however MN will have to make concessions on their Sanctuary City protections. They can’t simply keep hiding illegal criminals from ICE agents and allowing them to walk the streets. They need to start co-operating.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2573
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 644 times
Been liked: 957 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Whilst Comma craves PR,he is no fan of democracy. He proved this time and again in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum.
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2688
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 172 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post easthammer »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
Whilst I have always thought that PR was desirable from the point of view of improved democracy, if this AI assessment is anywhere near true, I don't think it will bring about better government.

This is what AI assess would have been the outcome had the last election been under pr

Key Changes to the Political Landscape
  • End of One-Party Rule: Under almost all PR models, Labour would have won approximately 219 to 228 seats, far short of a majority. A "progressive" coalition including Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens would likely have been the most viable governing option.
  • Surge for Smaller Parties: Reform UK and the Green Party would have seen the most dramatic gains. Reform UK would have increased from 5 seats to roughly 90–100 seats, while the Greens would have jumped from 4 to over 60 seats.
  • Stronger Official Opposition: The Conservatives would have remained the second-largest party with approximately 139–148 seats. Under some specific projections, they might have even been closely rivaled by Reform UK for the role of primary opposition.
  • Shift in Regional Power: The SNP would have nearly doubled its seat count from 9 to 16 or 18 seats, while Plaid Cymru would have maintained or slightly increased its representation.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6038
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 548 times
Been liked: 1069 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
Mr Anon
Posts: 835
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 205 times
Been liked: 229 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

can't say any mention of it but that latest ICE killing looks look an execution in cold blood
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 604
Has liked: 345 times
Been liked: 144 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Westside wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 15:41
, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
Yes, I wish we had had one. It would be much better than that referendum on switching to AV, a watered down and complicated version of first past the post, that we had in 2011.
OK_Guy
Posts: 240
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 363 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

how the Lib-Dems betrayed their values when they teamed-up with the Tories, especially Nick Clegg... another 'nose in the troth' cսnt, went on to earn multi-millions with Meta/Facebook.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5328
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 82 times
Been liked: 739 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:59 Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
 
 
We KNOW the current lot are not fit to govern under the Labour party mandate (through experience). We KNOW the previous lot are not fit to govern under the Tory party mandate (through experience). 

We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
Westside
Posts: 1215
Old WHO Number: 15592
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 131 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westside »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1200
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 691 times
Been liked: 671 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
So you'd like us to move to proportional representation instead of FPTP, Mr Comma? You've kept that quiet 😉

(Of course you'd prefer PR - it's the only way the Lib Dems would get a sniff of power)
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4344
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 608 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
,
Posts: 1214
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 143 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1200
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 691 times
Been liked: 671 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Massive Attack" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:05
Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter



 

🤔

Image
See what I mean?? His head is far too big for his haircut! This man is not right. Makes my jeebs heeb. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5328
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 82 times
Been liked: 739 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 
You can smell the fear here, even online. The country NEEDS a change of people and policy in the elected administration.

The state and media will do all they can to prevent that change, but better by far that it happens by ballot, even, if, like Brexit, that ballot doesn't deliver what the state and media hierarchy feel they (and fuck everybody else) "justifiably" are entitled to.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7914
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4603 times
Been liked: 2459 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 

🤔

Image
Post Reply