AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1242
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 251 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
nychammer wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 01:24give me your illegal alien criminals
your societal outcasts, yearning to live here for free
the generous refuge of a corrupt benefits system galore (in return for their vote one day)
NO send the gangbangers, drug dealers and rapists back
and shut the fucking door.
Doesn't that perfectly describe New York at its inception?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 21:07Nutsin wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:52zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
give me your illegal alien criminals
your societal outcasts, yearning to live here for free
the generous refuge of a corrupt benefits system galore (in return for their vote one day)
NO send the gangbangers, drug dealers and rapists back
and shut the fucking door.
your societal outcasts, yearning to live here for free
the generous refuge of a corrupt benefits system galore (in return for their vote one day)
NO send the gangbangers, drug dealers and rapists back
and shut the fucking door.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1515
- Been liked: 366 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Superb.
I'd filled him under "wouldn't ask him to babysit".
I'd filled him under "wouldn't ask him to babysit".
-
Sydney_Iron
- Posts: 2061
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 193 times
- Been liked: 419 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
ICE doing stuff without checking
Thick Cunts......
.ICE deported a man charged over the 'largest jewellery heist in US history' before he could face trial - ABC News
A man accused of helping orchestrate a jewellery heist described by authorities as the largest in US history may never face trial.
Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores faced a maximum 15 years in jail if convicted of his alleged role in stealing about $147 million worth of gold, gems and luxury watches in 2022.
Despite prosecutors' efforts to secure a conviction, Mr Flores was detained by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and deported without their knowledge.
.ICE deported a man charged over the 'largest jewellery heist in US history' before he could face trial - ABC News
A man accused of helping orchestrate a jewellery heist described by authorities as the largest in US history may never face trial.
Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores faced a maximum 15 years in jail if convicted of his alleged role in stealing about $147 million worth of gold, gems and luxury watches in 2022.
Despite prosecutors' efforts to secure a conviction, Mr Flores was detained by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and deported without their knowledge.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 21:07Nutsin wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:52zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Kinda odd that it’s only Minnesota that has this chaotic issue with ICE.
Do you think it might have something to do with the state It’s Governor and other elected officials being investigated for massive fraud?
Do you think it might have something to do with the state It’s Governor and other elected officials being investigated for massive fraud?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:52zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
zebthecat wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I’d agree with that, however MN will have to make concessions on their Sanctuary City protections. They can’t simply keep hiding illegal criminals from ICE agents and allowing them to walk the streets. They need to start co-operating.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2560
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 638 times
- Been liked: 953 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Whilst Comma craves PR,he is no fan of democracy. He proved this time and again in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum.
- easthammer
- Posts: 2683
- Old WHO Number: 15731
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 170 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
Whilst I have always thought that PR was desirable from the point of view of improved democracy, if this AI assessment is anywhere near true, I don't think it will bring about better government.
This is what AI assess would have been the outcome had the last election been under pr
Key Changes to the Political Landscape
This is what AI assess would have been the outcome had the last election been under pr
Key Changes to the Political Landscape
- End of One-Party Rule: Under almost all PR models, Labour would have won approximately 219 to 228 seats, far short of a majority. A "progressive" coalition including Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens would likely have been the most viable governing option.
- Surge for Smaller Parties: Reform UK and the Green Party would have seen the most dramatic gains. Reform UK would have increased from 5 seats to roughly 90–100 seats, while the Greens would have jumped from 4 to over 60 seats.
- Stronger Official Opposition: The Conservatives would have remained the second-largest party with approximately 139–148 seats. Under some specific projections, they might have even been closely rivaled by Reform UK for the role of primary opposition.
- Shift in Regional Power: The SNP would have nearly doubled its seat count from 9 to 16 or 18 seats, while Plaid Cymru would have maintained or slightly increased its representation.
- goose
- Posts: 5953
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1061 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 586
- Has liked: 340 times
- Been liked: 137 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Westside wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 15:41, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
Yes, I wish we had had one. It would be much better than that referendum on switching to AV, a watered down and complicated version of first past the post, that we had in 2011.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
how the Lib-Dems betrayed their values when they teamed-up with the Tories, especially Nick Clegg... another 'nose in the troth' cսnt, went on to earn multi-millions with Meta/Facebook.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5298
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 725 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:59 Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
We KNOW the current lot are not fit to govern under the Labour party mandate (through experience). We KNOW the previous lot are not fit to govern under the Tory party mandate (through experience).
We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
