Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply

Stamford Bridge takeover? What will the score be?

West Ham run amok. Away Win!
16
39%
A good point on the road. Draw.
6
15%
Blue flag flying high. Home Win.
19
46%
 
Total votes: 41

User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1865
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 855 times

Scum Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post stubbo-admin »

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Match Centre

 Odds
WHU: 11/2
Draw: 18/5
Chelsea: 8/15

 Pre-Match Press Conference
Official Site

 Match Preview
Hammers Chat

 Watch-along:
Hammers Chat

Streams:

Sport+

 If there above doesn't work go look for a Stream from the sites listed here!

https://champagne.pages.dev/docs/gettin ... ive-sports
 
 (With all live streams be mindful they can carry viruses etc.  Don't click on any ads and use a VPN).
   ----------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3983
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 14:30 and Dennis Wise.
that league cup game, when julian tried to break his legs. will never forget it

and don't ever feel sorry for that midget fucker, if you ever hear the story about him breaking his team mate's jaw while at leicester. dicksie should have hit hit him even harder
User avatar
WHU(Exeter)
Posts: 1533
Old WHO Number: 13669
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 234 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post WHU(Exeter) »

Could be a new thread. If you were a player, which opposition player, could you not have resisted punching in the face.

Mine would've been Steve Archibald
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3983
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

players should be constantly dragging that spanish cսnt to the ground by his hair, he has to be the most annoying fucker since perry groves/robbie savage
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 2037
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post BRANDED »

I deffo think we won the brawl
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2120
Has liked: 561 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Far Cough UKunt »

The Mercernary" wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 13:15 I think Cucurella handballs it while he's lying on the floor - Traore was expecting a free kick and went mental when we didn't get it. A free kick there wasn't much of a benefit versus a corner anyway, although a yellow for the midget would've been good.
The Cucaracha cսnt that he is.
User avatar
The Mercernary
Posts: 90
Location: Horsham
Old WHO Number: 10277
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 21 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post The Mercernary »

I think Cucurella handballs it while he's lying on the floor - Traore was expecting a free kick and went mental when we didn't get it. A free kick there wasn't much of a benefit versus a corner anyway, although a yellow for the midget would've been good.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2120
Has liked: 561 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Far Cough UKunt »

I must have missed what started Traore going berserk thing, what happened?
Sir Alf
Posts: 3169
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Sir Alf »

Pablo and Taty’s levels ( running ) definitely drops for the last 20-30 mins. But so does Soucek’s and Fernandes.  Nuno seems to be one dimensional in his thinking that you defend only across the back line, “the last line of defence” literally. But anyone who has played the game knows that you defend best as a team and the better you are at it further up the pitch the less of the load on the back 4 etc.  Reduce the number of crosses into the box.  Starts with pressing CBs and the opposition back line into passing but then makimg it hard to progress through midfield.  Chelsea changes were designed to bolster midfield and get down the flanks. Nuno needed someone like Marshall and one other ( could even be a midfielder or defender so long as they have legs / stamina ) to come on last 20 mins and to simply press relentlessly. In midfield, same remit to refresh the middle and contimue pressing. Magassa is good at interceptions and would like Potts be told to run their arses off for 20 mins. KWP to replace Bowen to plug the wide right flank and I would have preferred Mayers on with Scarles to add legs and pace on the left and give Neto, Palmer and co far less space and time.  Stick with 2 CBs. Stop the supply.  Nuno has never tried anything but adding the slow, hesitant Kilman as a third CB.  He got the Scarles for Diouf sub right but as memtioned needed the legs and pace of Mayers too down that left side as that was the main area where the threat was coming from.

It would seem ( as we suspected ) Nuno is tactically limited. Would be interesting to know what Paco was saying to him ( if anything ) and whether he listened?
Rossal
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Rossal »

Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:33
Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:56 The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
While you've made some good points, I can't believe that a young player like Pablo can't get through 90 minutes. 
Fair point, he was sweating his tits off on about 30 mins when the camera went to him. 

The whole team seemed to lose energy and half a yard as soon as they scored their first. Whether its a mentality thing, or whether its Nuno not reacting to their subs and putting fresh legs into the middle of the pitch I dunno.  But we seemed to lose the intensity in our press as soon as we conceded. 
Rossal
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Rossal »

Tomshardware wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:31
Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:26
Tomshardware wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:14
Hanging on doesn’t work and is so often the reason we end up losing games.   There is no reason that the player coming on for Pablo can't do the same role (even if it's not the natural position for the player coming on) Closing down and making a general nuisance in the final third.   Bringing a centre half on is an invitation to the opposition to attack, and for our own players to retreat.  We know what happens next.
Yep i totally agree.  The issue is that on that bench there isn't anyone that presses from the front and can hold the ball  up. Thats the issue. Pablo is good at taking the ball back to goal and linking up with the midfield. Asking a Potts or Magassa to do that against centre halves is pointless.  Wilson can do it, but he doesnt press half as good and is usually up there on his own by the time he comes on. 

There's no solution to the problem with this squad. Combined with the fact we cant keep a clean sheet, expect many more points dropped form winning positions in the second half of games. 
I'd argue that we would have had a better chance with Potts or Magassa coming on in Pablo position.   A player who is at least up the pitch and able to get involved.    Bringing on a centre half was waving the white flag.    Chelsea obviously have a superior squad but we made it easier for them than it had to be.
I am agreeing with you mate, my point is if Nuno wants to play that way and has seen this month that it works........then we need another striker or attacking midfielder to avoid us having to change tactics every single match for the closing stages. 
Dick Shaftsbury
Posts: 322
Old WHO Number: 319145
Has liked: 321 times
Been liked: 183 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Dick Shaftsbury »

Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:56 The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
While you've made some good points, I can't believe that a young player like Pablo can't get through 90 minutes. 
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1166
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 559 times
Been liked: 264 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Tomshardware »

Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:26
Tomshardware wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:14
Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:56 The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
Hanging on doesn’t work and is so often the reason we end up losing games.   There is no reason that the player coming on for Pablo can't do the same role (even if it's not the natural position for the player coming on) Closing down and making a general nuisance in the final third.   Bringing a centre half on is an invitation to the opposition to attack, and for our own players to retreat.  We know what happens next.
Yep i totally agree.  The issue is that on that bench there isn't anyone that presses from the front and can hold the ball  up. Thats the issue. Pablo is good at taking the ball back to goal and linking up with the midfield. Asking a Potts or Magassa to do that against centre halves is pointless.  Wilson can do it, but he doesnt press half as good and is usually up there on his own by the time he comes on. 

There's no solution to the problem with this squad. Combined with the fact we cant keep a clean sheet, expect many more points dropped form winning positions in the second half of games. 
I'd argue that we would have had a better chance with Potts or Magassa coming on in Pablo position.   A player who is at least up the pitch and able to get involved.    Bringing on a centre half was waving the white flag.    Chelsea obviously have a superior squad but we made it easier for them than it had to be.
Rossal
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Rossal »

Tomshardware wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 09:14
Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:56 The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
Hanging on doesn’t work and is so often the reason we end up losing games.   There is no reason that the player coming on for Pablo can't do the same role (even if it's not the natural position for the player coming on) Closing down and making a general nuisance in the final third.   Bringing a centre half on is an invitation to the opposition to attack, and for our own players to retreat.  We know what happens next.
Yep i totally agree.  The issue is that on that bench there isn't anyone that presses from the front and can hold the ball  up. Thats the issue. Pablo is good at taking the ball back to goal and linking up with the midfield. Asking a Potts or Magassa to do that against centre halves is pointless.  Wilson can do it, but he doesnt press half as good and is usually up there on his own by the time he comes on. 

There's no solution to the problem with this squad. Combined with the fact we cant keep a clean sheet, expect many more points dropped form winning positions in the second half of games. 
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1166
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 559 times
Been liked: 264 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Tomshardware »

Rossal wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:56 The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
Hanging on doesn’t work and is so often the reason we end up losing games.   There is no reason that the player coming on for Pablo can't do the same role (even if it's not the natural position for the player coming on) Closing down and making a general nuisance in the final third.   Bringing a centre half on is an invitation to the opposition to attack, and for our own players to retreat.  We know what happens next.
Rossal
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Rossal »

The upturn in form for me is largely due to the new lads up top. Their energy up there and pressing from the front means we are winning the ball much higher up the pitch allowing us to get our dangerous players in dangerous areas more often and also allowing us to create more up the right end of the pitch. 

On 60 mins though Pablo is fucked, Taty's levels drop and then the thing that makes us look like a decent side can't happen for the final 20 mins as we cant replicate it from the bench. 

It feels like the only way to win matches is to be winning with 20-30 mins left and then hang on. There is no other way to win looking at the blueprint of the squad. 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4344
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Manuel »

A third goal would have killed it and we got in some good positions, usually wide right, but Fernandes had a good opportunity where he cut in from the left inside the box and had pretty much the whole back stick to aim at but went more central and it was blocked. How come you never saw Paqueta in those positions, I think he got a nose bleed if he entered the 18 yard area. 

Once it went 1-2 it was all so inevitable. At least take a point from it ffs.
Dick Shaftsbury
Posts: 322
Old WHO Number: 319145
Has liked: 321 times
Been liked: 183 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Dick Shaftsbury »

Iron Duke" wrote: 02 Feb 2026, 08:43 What was he so angry about? 
I think its just that Cucurella has the most punchable face. I would do that same in that position. 
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 1267
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Iron Duke »

Apart from the Wolves game, we usually play well for about 60 minutes. We don’t have loads of options on the bench, but this time we at least had Potts, Magassa and Wilson. Nuno clearly made the wrong substitutions and not for the first time.

As the media reported, it was a tactical masterclass from Rosenior, bringing on three players at halftime who cost a combined £200m. A mark of a true genius.

We bring on a bodybuilder with roid rage. By the way, what a fucking idiot. He had just won us a corner in the last minute and decided to go mental. What was he so angry about? Todibo was also stupid but it all stemmed from muscle Mary getting all upset over nothing.
Rossal
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Rossal »

Watching the game we should have been 3 or 4 up on 60 mins. Soon as they scored the team just stopped doing what was so good for the first 60 mins. Sitting deeper, no press from the front. Not getting into them in the midfield. We shat ourselves, theres no leadership on the pitch to sort things out. 

Nuno then fucks it as per with 5 at the back and Kilman. He had a easy ball upfield to play, shits himself goes to play it to Diouf and sends it off for a throw. Was that then the start of the equaliser?    Thought Mavro had to do much better for the first in marking Pedro. Takes a step forwards just before he crosses it for no reason whatsoever. Unfortunately Mavro and Kilman for two league games could prove fatal for us. 

Traore is an absolute disgrace. Debut and he goes and does that. Complete retard. Todibo is also thick as shit, 3 game ban for our best defender over some handbags. Should be a 2 week wage fine. Love that he sticks up for his teamates but dont get played to get banned for 3 games. 

3 points dropped yet again, there is huge pressure on the next two now without our best CB.  
honky cat
Posts: 1586
Has liked: 932 times
Been liked: 653 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post honky cat »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 01 Feb 2026, 18:07 We might have lost the game but....



Adama threw that Pedro bloke like a ragdoll.
i quite like that jimmy comes piling in at the end as well.
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1171
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 503 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post wils »

honky cat wrote: 01 Feb 2026, 20:16
stubbo-admin wrote: 01 Feb 2026, 20:06
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 01 Feb 2026, 12:44 Image
This, IMO, is to try and stop a 3 game ban becoming a 5 game ban.
Im genuinely worried this is going to be looked at again on monday, and mavvers will end up joining him. If traore is banned i'll throw a party.

Anyway, who have we got in the the youth team?

TBH, Pedro annoyed me so much I would accept relegation as a consequence of Tobido or whoever landing one on his smug face. It would be worth it.

But seriously, Tobido has gone up in my estimation for his reaction.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3983
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham | PL | 31.1.26 | Predictions & Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

Eastside surge" wrote: 01 Feb 2026, 19:50 If Cole palmer wasn’t a footballer he’d be riding around on a bike dressed in black including a balaclava with a man bag containing weed and a zombie knife!
and Rosenier ( Liam not Leroy ) winds me up as well got an arrogant air about him with no good reason 
or in a remake of Deliverance, playing a Banjo
Post Reply