AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Lucas Paquet?°
-
- Posts: 436
- Old WHO Number: 10197
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 14 times
-
- Posts: 2689
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 271 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Not a medical man but given he was allowed to start at Arsenal you'd imagine you'd be very cautious and keep him in cotton wool til the Sheff Utd game rather than risk him v Bristol. Calf injuries are very temperamental so better to be cautious. Hopefully 2 months is pessimistic
-
- Posts: 1697
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Agree to a point Pickle! but how do you not know the medical staff had told Moyes he was good to play? Maybe even the player himself thought he was ok, it's by no means certain this is all down to Moyes. But he should perhaps clarify..........."
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Paqueta was not fit to start last game and had to leave the field within 10 minutes. Those are the facts of this contingency - how a manager's responsibility is interpreted in this light largely depends on your own capacity to manage and take responsibility. I say Moyes should stand up and say ""I took a risk and now he's out for xxx according to the medical staff"". And I say Moyes's failure to do the basics in pretty much every contingency is glaring."
-
- Posts: 336
- Old WHO Number: 14384
-
- Posts: 1697
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Does anyone know the ""official"" verdict of what is wrong with him and this injury and importantly when he is back? We seem to swing from a week or 2 to being totally crocked for at least 2 months. All we have from the man himself is calm down?"
-
- Posts: 236
- Old WHO Number: 254112
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Even someone with an eyesight way worse than the real Marty Feldman. Could see how good pacqueta is . Unbelievable the amount the slagging off he's got on here . He's Gascoigne with a left foot . If he played for the N17 mob the media would be rimming him as much as they'd be sucking him off .
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Ha ha criticism of Moyes’s management is BAD-MOUTHING BROOKING. Truly the curse of the absurd flabby over-inflated ego strikes again.
-
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Fucking hell has some thick Moyes rimmer just linked the possibility of Moyes managing a master craftsman of a footballer in Sir Trev? Guess who would be getting cunted off by the Moyes brigade because he tried to do a neat one/two in the oppositions half…..and lost the ball because there was no one there to do the one/two with….
- factory seconds
- Posts: 164
- Old WHO Number: 294848
- Been liked: 64 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
moyes wasn't interested in paqueta as he was busying tripping over his own tongue lusting over lingard. he didn't even know how to use him until after the world cup where it was clear he was better in a deeper role.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3040
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 643 times
- Been liked: 946 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Extra Thick Lubricant. 'you lot' are the ones that think we're capable of better football, so this latest moronic narrative should be kept inside that peanut brain of yours. the only ones who bad mouthed paqueta are now the ones rimming moyes on a daily basis"
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Bet you lot would have bad mouth Brooking if this site was around in his time . cant you just enjoy his skills? to much to ask?
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Think he was asking us to “stay calm” rather than “calm down”. Use the existing thread etc.
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
-
- Posts: 1060
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 329 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Hammer and Pickle 2:15 Fri Dec 8 Well, you say Moyes is a very, very lucky boy to have him. But if the club has targeted Paqueta and Moyes sanctioned the move, then is he lucky? Its like saying Guardiola is lucky to have Haaland. Or Spurs are lucky to have Madison. Klopp with Salah. The clubs went out and got these players so its not really luck, is it?"
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"I’m sure we’ve all seen that pic of him on the deck looking up as his plan to force his man into a foul came off. It must be a nightmare to contain him and he was literally everywhere last night as he galvanised them into that second half performance. Moyes is a very, very lucky boy to have him."
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"And you're a liar goose and I can't be arsed to argue with a spamming, waste of time, wanker liar..."
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
Think about it goose. Don't know why DiCanio played so much and WH fans only had one song. You don't have a beard and it was a wind-up so just get over it.
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Yeh it is as deffo a wind-up, well played Will. **itches beard** Paqueta will start wide left tonight, the right back will press so he constantly receives the ball with his back to goal and has to pass backwards. Good times ?üëç"
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Teams have worked out that the way to neutralise the Paquet?° threat is to get the ball out wide quick where he has to come to it. Than if he gets it, crowd him out or cut out his pass to any forward player who can do anything with the ball, which eliminates Soucek. Odd isn‚Äôt it that Moyes still hasn‚Äôt seen it."
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Teams have worked out that the way to neutralise the Paquet?° threat is to get the ball out wide quick where he has to come to it. Than if he gets it, crowd him out or cut out his pass to any forward player who can do anything with the ball, which eliminates Soucek. Odd isn‚Äôt it that Moyes still hasn‚Äôt seen it."
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3093
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 445 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"""Of course he's not spending 90 minutes on the left wing, no players stays in one position for a whole game, be he is playing left midfield and spends most of his time there. To make out it's any different is bizarre."" This. Not sure you even need to be sat in the stadium live to realise this."
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"fraser - Yep, all fair enough, also because Paqueta isn't a natural wide man he is naturally going to want to come inside more where he is used to playing, where say with Benny or Cornet that's their natural position so are more likely to stay out there. The obvious question is why Moyes doesn't see it, well he does of course, but has to fit in potato salad no matter what. I'll stick me neck out though and say I fancy we might see a change tonight, think Moyes has been hinting at it too after Palace."
Re: Lucas Paquet?°
"Manuel - of course that's true. But I'm over by the left hand corner flag and so many times we get the ball there's never an option there. Even if Emerson gets it he often has to turn back or come inside.. So we're predictable, and slow with it... We're easy to defend against we rarely open teams up. JWP was over there Sunday when we scored the goal, we actually moved the ball quickly but we rarely do."