Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Lucas Paquet?°

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
LeroysBoots
Posts: 436
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 14 times

Lucas Paquet?°

Post LeroysBoots »

"Sell him Showboating twat 85 million ?, you're having a laugh !"
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2690
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 271 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Fauxstralian »

Not a medical man but given he was allowed to start at Arsenal you'd imagine you'd be very cautious and keep him in cotton wool til the Sheff Utd game rather than risk him v Bristol. Calf injuries are very temperamental so better to be cautious. Hopefully 2 months is pessimistic
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1697
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Sydney_Iron »

"Agree to a point Pickle! but how do you not know the medical staff had told Moyes he was good to play? Maybe even the player himself thought he was ok, it's by no means certain this is all down to Moyes. But he should perhaps clarify..........."
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"Paqueta was not fit to start last game and had to leave the field within 10 minutes. Those are the facts of this contingency - how a manager's responsibility is interpreted in this light largely depends on your own capacity to manage and take responsibility. I say Moyes should stand up and say ""I took a risk and now he's out for xxx according to the medical staff"". And I say Moyes's failure to do the basics in pretty much every contingency is glaring."
mashed in maryland
Posts: 336
Old WHO Number: 14384

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post mashed in maryland »

I'm just glad we can slag Moyes off for playing someone instead of resting them
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1697
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Sydney_Iron »

"Does anyone know the ""official"" verdict of what is wrong with him and this injury and importantly when he is back? We seem to swing from a week or 2 to being totally crocked for at least 2 months. All we have from the man himself is calm down?"
marty feldman
Posts: 236
Old WHO Number: 254112

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post marty feldman »

Even someone with an eyesight way worse than the real Marty Feldman. Could see how good pacqueta is . Unbelievable the amount the slagging off he's got on here . He's Gascoigne with a left foot . If he played for the N17 mob the media would be rimming him as much as they'd be sucking him off .
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Ha ha criticism of Moyes’s management is BAD-MOUTHING BROOKING. Truly the curse of the absurd flabby over-inflated ego strikes again.
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Side of Ham »

Fucking hell has some thick Moyes rimmer just linked the possibility of Moyes managing a master craftsman of a footballer in Sir Trev? Guess who would be getting cunted off by the Moyes brigade because he tried to do a neat one/two in the oppositions half…..and lost the ball because there was no one there to do the one/two with….
User avatar
factory seconds
Posts: 164
Old WHO Number: 294848
Been liked: 64 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post factory seconds »

moyes wasn't interested in paqueta as he was busying tripping over his own tongue lusting over lingard. he didn't even know how to use him until after the world cup where it was clear he was better in a deeper role.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3042
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 643 times
Been liked: 946 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Takashi Miike »

"Extra Thick Lubricant. 'you lot' are the ones that think we're capable of better football, so this latest moronic narrative should be kept inside that peanut brain of yours. the only ones who bad mouthed paqueta are now the ones rimming moyes on a daily basis"
wd40
Posts: 228
Old WHO Number: 275868

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post wd40 »

Bet you lot would have bad mouth Brooking if this site was around in his time . cant you just enjoy his skills? to much to ask?
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Think he was asking us to “stay calm” rather than “calm down”. Use the existing thread etc.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Ah OK. How about “privileged” or “very fortunate”?
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1060
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 329 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Russ of the BML »

"Hammer and Pickle 2:15 Fri Dec 8 Well, you say Moyes is a very, very lucky boy to have him. But if the club has targeted Paqueta and Moyes sanctioned the move, then is he lucky? Its like saying Guardiola is lucky to have Haaland. Or Spurs are lucky to have Madison. Klopp with Salah. The clubs went out and got these players so its not really luck, is it?"
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"I’m sure we’ve all seen that pic of him on the deck looking up as his plan to force his man into a foul came off. It must be a nightmare to contain him and he was literally everywhere last night as he galvanised them into that second half performance. Moyes is a very, very lucky boy to have him."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4402
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post goose »

Yeh you’re best off making the most of the time you have left.
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Willtell »

"And you're a liar goose and I can't be arsed to argue with a spamming, waste of time, wanker liar..."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4402
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post goose »

actually i do have a beard and i'm itching it right now. if it was an attempt at humour (it obvs wasnt) then it was shit. so are you stupid or unfunny? or both. i'm going for both.
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Willtell »

Think about it goose. Don't know why DiCanio played so much and WH fans only had one song. You don't have a beard and it was a wind-up so just get over it.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4402
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post goose »

"Yeh it is as deffo a wind-up, well played Will. **itches beard** Paqueta will start wide left tonight, the right back will press so he constantly receives the ball with his back to goal and has to pass backwards. Good times ?üëç"
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"Teams have worked out that the way to neutralise the Paquet?° threat is to get the ball out wide quick where he has to come to it. Than if he gets it, crowd him out or cut out his pass to any forward player who can do anything with the ball, which eliminates Soucek. Odd isn‚Äôt it that Moyes still hasn‚Äôt seen it."
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"Teams have worked out that the way to neutralise the Paquet?° threat is to get the ball out wide quick where he has to come to it. Than if he gets it, crowd him out or cut out his pass to any forward player who can do anything with the ball, which eliminates Soucek. Odd isn‚Äôt it that Moyes still hasn‚Äôt seen it."
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3093
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 445 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Lee Trundle »

"""Of course he's not spending 90 minutes on the left wing, no players stays in one position for a whole game, be he is playing left midfield and spends most of his time there. To make out it's any different is bizarre."" This. Not sure you even need to be sat in the stadium live to realise this."
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post Manuel »

"fraser - Yep, all fair enough, also because Paqueta isn't a natural wide man he is naturally going to want to come inside more where he is used to playing, where say with Benny or Cornet that's their natural position so are more likely to stay out there. The obvious question is why Moyes doesn't see it, well he does of course, but has to fit in potato salad no matter what. I'll stick me neck out though and say I fancy we might see a change tonight, think Moyes has been hinting at it too after Palace."
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2035
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: Lucas Paquet?°

Post fraser »

"Manuel - of course that's true. But I'm over by the left hand corner flag and so many times we get the ball there's never an option there. Even if Emerson gets it he often has to turn back or come inside.. So we're predictable, and slow with it... We're easy to defend against we rarely open teams up. JWP was over there Sunday when we scored the goal, we actually moved the ball quickly but we rarely do."
Post Reply