AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Ugs. Yes or no?
-
- Posts: 336
- Old WHO Number: 224273
- Has liked: 23 times
- Been liked: 46 times
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1063
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 510 times
- Been liked: 488 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
"I've seen them, but the shape and materials mean it's a big NOPE from me. I would panic if I had to wear those. Far too warm with all that sheepskin up to calf level. If my feet are not comfortable for any reason, I can't function."
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 794
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 440 times
- Been liked: 289 times
-
- Posts: 118
- Old WHO Number: 245976
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 4 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
They are a generic term for sheepskin boots that were made by lots of small companies-people all over Australia and were cheap as chips then the name was registered by an American group and stated to sue all the Aussie companies that had been making them for donkeys years. They then started charging a fortune for inferior products made in China and made a global brand. Capitalism at its worst.
- chim chim cha boo
- Posts: 443
- Old WHO Number: 17737
- Has liked: 24 times
- Been liked: 33 times
- chim chim cha boo
- Posts: 443
- Old WHO Number: 17737
- Has liked: 24 times
- Been liked: 33 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
No. I don't think it's in any way controversial to say that anyone caught wearing them should have their feet removed with a chainsaw and sent to Rwanda.
-
- Posts: 1145
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 402 times
- Been liked: 412 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
"They tend to have a reputation for being worn by Essex slags. But, then again, what's wrong with that?"
-
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
-
- Posts: 422
- Old WHO Number: 17468
- Has liked: 120 times
- Been liked: 91 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
I once tried some on at an after party. They were incredibly comfortable. For that reason I am IN