
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Sullivan out!
-
- Posts: 1179
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 276 times
-
- Posts: 395
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 731 times
- Been liked: 146 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑12 Jul 2025, 00:23 Nah he definitely holds a grudge against the hardcore fanbase since many of us made our feelings known about him (them) since the worst Stadium migration in world sport happened. He (like the witch) knows he's despised by true Hammers everywhere and the relationship is toxic as fuck. All they can cling on to now is the happily oblivious transient Tourist fan who lap up everything the Club does under their watch.
I think it's a pretty damning fact that as football teams around the world were tearing down their municipal athletics stadiums to build a proper football stadium modelled on the atmosphere of a traditional British ground that those idiots shoehorned us into the worst possible example of a municipal athletics stadium totally unfit for football.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4730
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 590 times
Re: Sullivan out!
XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Jul 2025, 02:26Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 23:55 Maybe, like several posters on here, Sullivan is holding a long term grudge against the club (not fellow supporters).
If you think back, he was only really interested in buying West Ham when there was the possibility of a Casino being attached somewhere along the line.
That never happened and so all things West Ham now boil his piss.Why do you make this shit up and post it?
To give you a reason to live.
Re: Sullivan out!
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 23:55 Maybe, like several posters on here, Sullivan is holding a long term grudge against the club (not fellow supporters).
If you think back, he was only really interested in buying West Ham when there was the possibility of a Casino being attached somewhere along the line.
That never happened and so all things West Ham now boil his piss.
-
- Posts: 5781
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3348 times
- Been liked: 1666 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Nah he definitely holds a grudge against the hardcore fanbase since many of us made our feelings known about him (them) since the worst Stadium migration in world sport happened. He (like the witch) knows he's despised by true Hammers everywhere and the relationship is toxic as fuck. All they can cling on to now is the happily oblivious transient Tourist fan who lap up everything the Club does under their watch.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4730
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 33 times
- Been liked: 590 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Maybe, like several posters on here, Sullivan is holding a long term grudge against the club (not fellow supporters).
If you think back, he was only really interested in buying West Ham when there was the possibility of a Casino being attached somewhere along the line.
That never happened and so all things West Ham now boil his piss.
If you think back, he was only really interested in buying West Ham when there was the possibility of a Casino being attached somewhere along the line.
That never happened and so all things West Ham now boil his piss.
-
- Posts: 605
- Old WHO Number: 10365
- Has liked: 286 times
- Been liked: 104 times
Re: Sullivan out!
But the vast majority of fans swallowed those lies hook line and sinker. The poison dwarf and his highly paid brass have been lying ever since.
-
- Posts: 395
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 731 times
- Been liked: 146 times
Re: Sullivan out!
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 20:26Westside wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 19:56 "so do you support the Board?"
Not all of them. But when they have done the odd thing for the benefit of the club, I'll point it out. Like the £30 million rights issue and Kretinsky's £125 million he pumped in. And although they were well rewarded with interest payments, the loans they provided to the club, on relegation, back in the day, meant we didn't go into administration. And the owners (not Brady) have never drawn dividends or salaries.
For the money we pay Brady, I refuse to believe we coudn't get a more adept, brighter, sharper CEO (or what ever her job title is).Fuck me, are you Jack Sullivan?
by the looks, this board must rank in the worst in Premiership history (short history it is mind), we used to make decent signings back in the day, remember Parks being the most expensive keeper ever? still how we have fallen, at least the old board from times past had decent connections to the club as supporters... am I disillusioned?, since these cunts took over yes, how Birmingham fans celebrated when they left & laughed like hyenas when they took over West Ham, the bullshit & lies ever since and most lap it up with expectation (realising too late it was just more bullshit)
still as long as the club is leveraged to the hilt & run like a micky-mouse outfit to the benefit of the midgets mates & co, some will be moon bound... pray tell me, how many would sell a fully paid-up house to move into a rental-property?
this coming season fills me with dread, we have been lucky not to have been relegated in the last couple of seasons, hopefully we can avoid it again(sic).
still as long as the club is leveraged to the hilt & run like a micky-mouse outfit to the benefit of the midgets mates & co, some will be moon bound... pray tell me, how many would sell a fully paid-up house to move into a rental-property?
this coming season fills me with dread, we have been lucky not to have been relegated in the last couple of seasons, hopefully we can avoid it again(sic).
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1473
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 504 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Oh dear Westside....aren't you lucky to feel like having such caring and supportive owners. Bless you
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3757
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 721 times
Re: Sullivan out!
"Not sure what point you’re trying to make, seems like you’re just reinforcing that they’re shit owners compared to every other club whilst trying be a picky fucker."
The point is, you criticise them, for things which are untrue, which makes you look the right knob, you are.
The point is, you criticise them, for things which are untrue, which makes you look the right knob, you are.
-
- Posts: 346
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 103 times
- Been liked: 86 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Westside wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 19:56 "so do you support the Board?"
Not all of them. But when they have done the odd thing for the benefit of the club, I'll point it out. Like the £30 million rights issue and Kretinsky's £125 million he pumped in. And although they were well rewarded with interest payments, the loans they provided to the club, on relegation, back in the day, meant we didn't go into administration. And the owners (not Brady) have never drawn dividends or salaries.
For the money we pay Brady, I refuse to believe we coudn't get a more adept, brighter, sharper CEO (or what ever her job title is).
Fuck me, are you Jack Sullivan?
-
- Posts: 346
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 103 times
- Been liked: 86 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Westside wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 18:59 "Apart from the initial buy the board haven’t put any money in to the club apart from when it’s earning them 6%, it’s the clubs money."
And the £30 million they put in, via a share rights issue during Covid.
Yes, we do owe a fortune to other clubs for transfers. Standard practice. What would you prefer, that, or paying all the money due on a transfer up front? Which in itseslf, would incur more borrowing costs.
Plenty to criticise the board for, without getting things wrong.
Not sure what point you’re trying to make, seems like you’re just reinforcing that they’re shit owners compared to every other club whilst trying be a picky fucker.
-
- Posts: 5781
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3348 times
- Been liked: 1666 times
Re: Sullivan out!
"so do you support the Board?"
Not all of them. But when they have done the odd thing for the benefit of the club, I'll point it out. Like the £30 million rights issue and Kretinsky's £125 million he pumped in. And although they were well rewarded with interest payments, the loans they provided to the club, on relegation, back in the day, meant we didn't go into administration. And the owners (not Brady) have never drawn dividends or salaries.
For the money we pay Brady, I refuse to believe we coudn't get a more adept, brighter, sharper CEO (or what ever her job title is).
Not all of them. But when they have done the odd thing for the benefit of the club, I'll point it out. Like the £30 million rights issue and Kretinsky's £125 million he pumped in. And although they were well rewarded with interest payments, the loans they provided to the club, on relegation, back in the day, meant we didn't go into administration. And the owners (not Brady) have never drawn dividends or salaries.
For the money we pay Brady, I refuse to believe we coudn't get a more adept, brighter, sharper CEO (or what ever her job title is).
Re: Sullivan out!
Westside wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 18:59 "Apart from the initial buy the board haven’t put any money in to the club apart from when it’s earning them 6%, it’s the clubs money."
And the £30 million they put in, via a share rights issue during Covid.
Yes, we do owe a fortune to other clubs for transfers. Standard practice. What would you prefer, that, or paying all the money due on a transfer up front? Which in itseslf, would incur more borrowing costs.
Plenty to criticise the board for, without getting things wrong.
so do you support the Board? or would you rather have some other owners with a vested interest in the club who have a plan for the future?
in truth, I'd rather have the Cearns at least we had entertaining footie and the occasional Cup-run when we actually won something of note (I don't include the recent tin-pot cup win).
in truth, I'd rather have the Cearns at least we had entertaining footie and the occasional Cup-run when we actually won something of note (I don't include the recent tin-pot cup win).
Re: Sullivan out!
"Apart from the initial buy the board haven’t put any money in to the club apart from when it’s earning them 6%, it’s the clubs money."
And the £30 million they put in, via a share rights issue during Covid.
Yes, we do owe a fortune to other clubs for transfers. Standard practice. What would you prefer, that, or paying all the money due on a transfer up front? Which in itseslf, would incur more borrowing costs.
Plenty to criticise the board for, without getting things wrong.
And the £30 million they put in, via a share rights issue during Covid.
Yes, we do owe a fortune to other clubs for transfers. Standard practice. What would you prefer, that, or paying all the money due on a transfer up front? Which in itseslf, would incur more borrowing costs.
Plenty to criticise the board for, without getting things wrong.
-
- Posts: 395
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 731 times
- Been liked: 146 times
Re: Sullivan out!
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 11:25 Unfortunately by the time a lot of our fans wake up to the fact that Sullivan doesn’t give a fuck for the club or its supporters, he only sees it as a money maker. Everyone is making the assumption that the club will survive no matter what, they see that the worst that could happen is relegation. Him, Brady and Gold (when he was here) have fleeced and lied to the support for as long as they have been here, systematically selling off, re mortgaging, over inflating the costs of players who have been bought through preferred agents. Apart from the initial buy the board haven’t put any money in to the club apart from when it’s earning them 6%, it’s the clubs money, Kretinsky bought in and his money was used but all GSB seemed to have done is run the club on borrowing. Fuck me are we really any better off than when they rocked up?
The cheapest stadium, stewarding and policing costs in probably all the divisions, training facilities that are totally eclipsed by clubs with a third of the gates we get and still we have no money even though we’re being overseen by a self proclaimed business genius. She’s a genius at making Sullivan money, They’re asset stripping the club, and if you looked through anything different than your claret and blue spectacles more would see it.
We apparently owe other clubs we’ve bought players from a fortune because of the way we structure payments, everything is mortgaged even the shitty training ground, we own fuck all and will always own fuck all while these are bleeding out the club. I don’t think the fanbase will realise until Sullivan says one day “fuck you all, I’ve had enough and made enough, there’s fuck all left”.
"The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood, he was one of them."
An old proverb from the southern reaches of Europe
An old proverb from the southern reaches of Europe
-
- Posts: 346
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 103 times
- Been liked: 86 times
Re: Sullivan out!
Unfortunately by the time a lot of our fans wake up to the fact that Sullivan doesn’t give a fuck for the club or its supporters, he only sees it as a money maker. Everyone is making the assumption that the club will survive no matter what, they see that the worst that could happen is relegation. Him, Brady and Gold (when he was here) have fleeced and lied to the support for as long as they have been here, systematically selling off, re mortgaging, over inflating the costs of players who have been bought through preferred agents. Apart from the initial buy the board haven’t put any money in to the club apart from when it’s earning them 6%, it’s the clubs money, Kretinsky bought in and his money was used but all GSB seemed to have done is run the club on borrowing. Fuck me are we really any better off than when they rocked up?
The cheapest stadium, stewarding and policing costs in probably all the divisions, training facilities that are totally eclipsed by clubs with a third of the gates we get and still we have no money even though we’re being overseen by a self proclaimed business genius. She’s a genius at making Sullivan money, They’re asset stripping the club, and if you looked through anything different than your claret and blue spectacles more would see it.
We apparently owe other clubs we’ve bought players from a fortune because of the way we structure payments, everything is mortgaged even the shitty training ground, we own fuck all and will always own fuck all while these are bleeding out the club. I don’t think the fanbase will realise until Sullivan says one day “fuck you all, I’ve had enough and made enough, there’s fuck all left”.
The cheapest stadium, stewarding and policing costs in probably all the divisions, training facilities that are totally eclipsed by clubs with a third of the gates we get and still we have no money even though we’re being overseen by a self proclaimed business genius. She’s a genius at making Sullivan money, They’re asset stripping the club, and if you looked through anything different than your claret and blue spectacles more would see it.
We apparently owe other clubs we’ve bought players from a fortune because of the way we structure payments, everything is mortgaged even the shitty training ground, we own fuck all and will always own fuck all while these are bleeding out the club. I don’t think the fanbase will realise until Sullivan says one day “fuck you all, I’ve had enough and made enough, there’s fuck all left”.
Re: Sullivan out!
Yep I feel the same, if it goes bad on the pitch I hope it goes worse in the stands enough is enough.
Re: Sullivan out!
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025, 07:58I've got the same sense as well. I said on the transfer thread that the Kudus sale might a prelude for a pretty shitty season.
At least it's not likely to be a boring season with all the toxicity around the place, even if we are shit.
You haven't any sense whatsoever and how you going to feel if we do OK this season?
I'm going to cheer the team on rather than creating toxicity around the place
Sullivan ain't going anywhere unfortunately
I'm going to cheer the team on rather than creating toxicity around the place
Sullivan ain't going anywhere unfortunately
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3757
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 721 times
Re: Sullivan out!
I've got the same sense as well. I said on the transfer thread that the Kudus sale might a prelude for a pretty shitty season.
At least it's not likely to be a boring season with all the toxicity around the place, even if we are shit.
At least it's not likely to be a boring season with all the toxicity around the place, even if we are shit.
Re: Sullivan out!
I’ve a feeling this will be his last season involved (fingers crossed). Nothing more than a hunch really, but I have said before, the apathy is slowly turning back to anger, and we could see another ‘Burnley’ or something even more embarrassing for Sullivan.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Old WHO Number: 311212
- Has liked: 1165 times
- Been liked: 285 times