Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Fury v Usyk

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Phall Throw
Posts: 196
Old WHO Number: 307525

Fury v Usyk

Post Phall Throw »

Fury to win? Usyk to win? Draw? Called off at the last moment? Fixed? Not interested? May have to actually pay form this one as I can't be fucked arsing around with shit streams that buffer every 3 seconds. Fury inside 8 if he is 100% prepared Usyk on points if he has a good night Draw for the purpose of a rematch and more money could be a good punt You cunts?
LeroysBoots
Posts: 436
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post LeroysBoots »

"With you on that, couldn't give a toss"
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Manuel »

"Ultimately, is there anyone that really gives two hoots?? Genuine question."
Alfs
Posts: 834
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 55 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Alfs »

"Agree, Fonz. Also mental that Fury thought he'd won. Or is it just a part of the theatre, as he knows he has another 50 million payday coming in October?"
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

not one of u is commending my opinion. i was almost bang on. dont apologies but respect the opinion next time lol. read my breakdown of what would happen and why now if u ask nicely i will tell u what marvellous marvin hagler told me about the SRL fight. we had dinner and i finally had the courage to ask. give me a day or so to deal wtih a fellow hammer in trouible and then ill tell u xxxx
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 256 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

zebthecat 3:45 With the ‘knockdown’ you’ve at least 6 points too many there mate ;-) Maximum of 228.
Johnson
Posts: 142
Old WHO Number: 22778

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Johnson »

"Usyk was the better fighter, think that’s Fury’s lot. If he takes the rematch he’ll have to get some aggression in to him and I’m not sure he’s got that anymore. Usyk is nails, one of the best of the modern era."
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post onsideman »

Agree with that. Should've been stopped... but then boxing has been bent since the dawn of time
Ron Eff
Posts: 515
Old WHO Number: 229621
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 112 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Ron Eff »

"Fury thinking he won that when if it was anybody else that fight is stopped when his eyes were in the back of his head while he was staggering into the ropes. I wanted Fury to win, but Usyk was the clear winner. Shame Fury had to reference the war and claim it as a reason for the judges the decision. He should be thankful he got a split decision. It should have been unanimous. A cruiserweight dominating the so called best heavyweight division for years."
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3036
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Takashi Miike »

"ended up a comfortable win. fury, if he takes the rematch needs to start faster and realise that he's not going to outbox usyk. tyson showed he could hurt him but a more aggressive approach may lead to a knock out. usyk's a great champion"
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3036
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Takashi Miike »

"ended up a comfortable win. fury, if he takes the rematch needs to start faster and realise that he's not going to outbox usyk. tyson showed he could hurt him but a more aggressive approach may lead to a knock out. usyk's a great champion"
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1519
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post zebthecat »

That is the thing. Usyk can definitely go again.
threesixty
Posts: 674
Old WHO Number: 14819
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post threesixty »

"I thought Usyk would do it or it would draw. I just think he’s a better boxer overall. Wish Fury would have some class and not go one about the war and shit. Same with Joshua when he lost. Is that just a British thing to talk shit after you lose? Anyways, how fury recovers from shit is incredible. Never seen anything like it. But overall, that round done him. Cant get knocked out like that and win fights in my opinion. It’s not right."
Hermit Road
Posts: 194
Old WHO Number: 212340
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Hermit Road »

"I thought Fury had him worked out and then his ego took over and he forgot that he had to keep fighting for the whole fight. Once he went into cruise mode, Usyk came back like the warrior he is and Fury was lucky to survive to the end. Still think it could have gone either way. Lot of close rounds."
Pagey
Posts: 121
Old WHO Number: 11091

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pagey »

"Usyk showed his class there, especially from round 7 onwards. It looked like Fury had worked him out but that was an outstanding flurry of punches from Usyk. Fury should have gone down, but his pride was probably stopping him. Ridiculous that it was even a split decision, but at least Usyk got the result. It was a decent fight. I’m not sure if Fury has more to offer in October. It will be another lovely payday though."
The Fonz
Posts: 363
Old WHO Number: 224414

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post The Fonz »

Mental how that was a split decision.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1519
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post zebthecat »

Loved the blast of Killing Joke after the decision.
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post happygilmore »

Deserved for Usyk. Hopefully the cսnt fucks back off to tarmacadam but there is a rematch clause....
Alfs
Posts: 834
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 55 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Alfs »

It's being referred to VAR.
The Fonz
Posts: 363
Old WHO Number: 224414

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post The Fonz »

Usyk masterclass. Looking froward to the rematch.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1519
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post zebthecat »

I had it 118:115 Usyk
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4396
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

"Wow!! Didn’t see that coming, Fury was absolutely done!! Surely Usyk has won this by 3 or 4."
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 202 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

How Fury stayed up is unreal.
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post happygilmore »

I'd pay good money to see someone box the head off Ronaldo in the ring
happygilmore
Posts: 892
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post happygilmore »

Warren looks like a man that won't be on this planet much longer Won't be missed
Post Reply