Alan 8:45 Wed Jul 17
Paqueta - Latest news
|
Sport Bible
New report on Lucas Paqueta's spot-fixing charges reveals how much of next season West Ham star can play
There has been an update on Paqueta's case.
Alex Brotherton
Lucas Paqueta will be free to play for West Ham for most of next season despite facing spot-fixing charges.
Paqueta has been charged by the Football Association with four separate instances of spot-fixing.
The 28-year-old stands accused of deliberately getting himself booked during four Premier League matches.
It is one of the most serious cases of spot-fixing involving a top-flight player in England, and could land Paqueta with a lengthy ban.
However, the Brazil international can continue to play until the disciplinary process has been completed.
According to The Times, the outcome of the process could be delayed until the end of the 2024-25 season or beyond.
That is due to the complexity of the case; Paqueta's lawyers say it will take many months to secure all the witness statements and relevant information they need for their defence.
That's because the case spans three countries - England, Brazil and Spain - and involves a large number of people.
The charges allege that Paqueta got himself booked during matches against Leicester City, Aston Villa, Leeds United and Bournemouth over the past two seasons so that “one or more persons” could profit financially.
The investigation that preceded the charges took eight months.
In September 2023, Brazilian outlet Globo reported that suspicious gambling patterns were identified in Brazil relating to Paqueta being booked against Aston Villa in March that year.
The bets were reportedly made using West Ham's shirt sponsor Betway, via accounts belonging to people linked to Paqueta.
The FA initially gave the player until June 3 to respond to the charges, but his lawyers were granted an extension. English football's governing body has refused to put a timescale on the case.
Paqueta has been linked with a move to Brazilian giants Flamengo this summer, but this latest development will give encouragement to new West Ham boss Julen Lopetegui that he can use the midfielder this season.
|
|
![](dot.gif)
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Mex Martillo
8:54 Thu Jul 18
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
It's over a year ago that this all started and I remember Paqueta if anything played better when this was first announced and it supposedly screwed up the ManCity signing.
|
![](dot.gif)
Manuel
5:24 Thu Jul 18
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
mallard 9:19 Wed Jul 17
''It will be interesting to see how he performs with this hanging over him''
Don't see why it should effect him once he crosses the white line, if anything it's the one place he should forget about it the most. And it's not as if he's up for murder.
|
![](dot.gif)
Come On You Irons
2:02 Thu Jul 18
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Oh great. So we are stuck with another season of this showboating, diving twat in the midfield.
Was really hoping Man City would take him off our hands for his £85 million buy out fee.
|
![](dot.gif)
Sydney_Iron
12:51 Thu Jul 18
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Is he using the same legals as Man City? kicking this can further down the road and all that. LOL
Just hope he keeps his form up, we may have missed out on a big transfer fee, but on the positive side, a player of this caliber could make all the difference to getting a European spot or not
Look on the bright side i say.
|
![](dot.gif)
![](dot.gif)
![](dot.gif)
Eerie Descent
11:18 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Mashed, the difficult to prove bit is relevant only to a court of law. Unless they've got some cut & dry evidence, he won't be criminally convicted, and you would assume they haven't got hard evidence.
However, what he is being accused of is spot fixing, and he can be found guilty in the court of arbitration for sport, on the balance of probability (whether anyone thinks that's fair or not is neither here nor there, that's the rule). To be honest, the likelihood is he will be found guilty, given the FA are pressing full steam ahead.
The only hope we've got in that scenario is that it isn't a worldwide ban, and the Saudi's can pick him up on a decent enough fee, so we get something back at least. Wishful thinking maybe.
Just got to enjoy him for this season, I don't think we'll see him in our shirt after that regardless.
|
![](dot.gif)
Gary Strodders shank
11:02 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
You will still be able to back Paqueta to be booked with Betway next season. They went to big and got stung as far as I'm concerned Tinpot bookie with a shit website
|
![](dot.gif)
ray winstone
10:58 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Booked in the first game, nailed on n.
|
![](dot.gif)
mashed in maryland
10:57 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
The 6yo asked what about tactical fouling or giving away throw-ins? Could be argued they'd benefit your team. That's what I'd argue if I were a lawyer (I'm not)
Also what if they bet on 3 goals then were thru on goal for a 4th but cocked it up, intentionally or unintentionally?
Suppose I'm saying this sort of thing has got to be very difficult to prove. We've all seen players boot the ball out to time-waste or in petulance, and intentionally hacking someone down was normal for some clubs.
|
![](dot.gif)
Mr Anon
10:39 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
mashed in maryland 9:57 Wed Jul 17 Re: Paqueta - Latest news Silly question but if a player told someone "I'm going to score 3 goals so put a fiver on it" and then goes on and scores 3 goals... theoretically could similar charges be brought?
Legally what separates a goal from a booking/throw-in etc.?
Explain like I'm 6
id thought the difference would be obvious to a six year old, scoring for your own team is your intention anyway and doesn't corrupt the game, giving away free kicks and throw ins is not in your interest and corrupts the game
|
![](dot.gif)
Jaan Kenbrovin
10:31 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
The worst thing about this is it’s all due to Betway grizzling about 100k.
If I was Paqueta the last thing I’d want to wear is a shirt with their logo on it.
Sullivan should have told them they would be willing to tear up the sponsorship.
They are an absolutely appalling betting company and fuck punters about left right and centre. But then that’s in line with what Sullivan is like himself.
|
![](dot.gif)
mashed in maryland
9:57 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Silly question but if a player told someone "I'm going to score 3 goals so put a fiver on it" and then goes on and scores 3 goals... theoretically could similar charges be brought?
Legally what separates a goal from a booking/throw-in etc.?
Explain like I'm 6
|
![](dot.gif)
Gary Strodders shank
9:48 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
He is 28 now and will be nearer 30 by the time this is resolved so any big money move ain't going to happen regardless of whether he is found to be guilty or exonerated.
Let's hope he can leave it all behind him when he crosses the white lines and gives us 100% in effort and commitment.
|
![](dot.gif)
mallard
9:19 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
It will be interesting to see how he performs with this hanging over him
….thanks Alan
|
![](dot.gif)
Mex Martillo
9:18 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
I agree load of old bollocks Thought that from the very beginning
|
![](dot.gif)
Fauxstralian
9:00 Wed Jul 17
Re: Paqueta - Latest news
|
Any case that takes this long to resolve is obviously a load of old bollocks The club should sue the FA for the £85m transfer fee that Man City had agreed to give us. Also sue Prince William individually as FA President
|
![](dot.gif)
|