Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

New WHO | Site Feedback

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 615
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 176 times

New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo »

If you've got any (useful) feedback about the new site, feature requests or any issues spotted, reply to this message and we'll investigate!
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Come On You Irons »

I really like the new forum. Modernising it was long overdue as the old forum was frankly an embarrassment in terms of look and feel.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Manuel »

stubbo-admin wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 16:07
Manuel wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 15:55
collyrob wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 13:50 I’m definitely in the minority, I get that. I just preferred the old lay out. It’s hard to describe I just feel like it was easier to read and see usernames as you were reading. 

I don’t like all the images as well. 

but again, fair play for doing it. And the majority seem to prefer it this way. 
Agree with the usernames, you now have to have a 'proper' look to see who the post is from, but hey.. 
Would something like this be better?

big-usernames.PNG
I think so but not my call, maybe make the last poster name on the main forum page slightly larger too.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Nurse Ratched »

It's growing on me. Pleasantly. 

Would it be possible to simplify the process of sending WHOmail? I hesitate to send this comment because I don't have the energy to get drawn into a long conversation about it, but I don't think it needs to be that cluttered.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

Manuel wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 15:55
collyrob wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 13:50 I’m definitely in the minority, I get that. I just preferred the old lay out. It’s hard to describe I just feel like it was easier to read and see usernames as you were reading. 

I don’t like all the images as well. 

but again, fair play for doing it. And the majority seem to prefer it this way. 
Agree with the usernames, you now have to have a 'proper' look to see who the post is from, but hey.. 
Would something like this be better?
big-usernames.PNG
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Manuel »

collyrob wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 13:50 I’m definitely in the minority, I get that. I just preferred the old lay out. It’s hard to describe I just feel like it was easier to read and see usernames as you were reading. 

I don’t like all the images as well. 

but again, fair play for doing it. And the majority seem to prefer it this way. 
Agree with the usernames, you now have to have a 'proper' look to see who the post is from, but hey.. 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

Trilby55 wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 14:07 I tried to join as my previous name Lab but it wouldn’t let me , probably because I didn’t follow correct procedure . If admin can change it back to that ?
We can get you access to the 'Lab' account which does exist with your old posts, and then see if we can move the posts you've done as Trilby across to that account.

Send me a WHOmail / Private Message to sort out.
ludo21
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 240355
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post ludo21 »

stubbo and the others have done a great job. Very painless to the user anyway. Well done all.


I do miss the old site though. It was very very simple, which is why I liked it.

For a 'modern' site this isn't too bad, definitely seen a lot worse but like all new things takes some getting used to.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

collyrob wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 13:50 I’m definitely in the minority, I get that. I just preferred the old lay out. It’s hard to describe I just feel like it was easier to read and see usernames as you were reading. 

I don’t like all the images as well. 

but again, fair play for doing it. And the majority seem to prefer it this way. 
Sent you a Private Message...
Trilby55
Posts: 85
Has liked: 62 times
Been liked: 21 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Trilby55 »

I tried to join as my previous name Lab but it wouldn’t let me , probably because I didn’t follow correct procedure . If admin can change it back to that ?
1965
Posts: 8

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post 1965 »

It's too posh for us lot.
collyrob
Posts: 409
Old WHO Number: 226068
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post collyrob »

I’m definitely in the minority, I get that. I just preferred the old lay out. It’s hard to describe I just feel like it was easier to read and see usernames as you were reading. 

I don’t like all the images as well. 

but again, fair play for doing it. And the majority seem to prefer it this way. 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

collyrob wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 13:40 I appreciate the effort that’s been made. But it just doesn’t feel like WHO anymore. 
What's missing?  
collyrob
Posts: 409
Old WHO Number: 226068
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post collyrob »

I appreciate the effort that’s been made. But it just doesn’t feel like WHO anymore. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post fraser »

Yes he is and not in the way we are here.. Censorship 
Haz
Posts: 168
Old WHO Number: 11745
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 10 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Haz »

fraser wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 12:28
Mad Ferret" wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 12:20 Can see stubbo becoming a bit like Up the Junction on Kumb…

Hope I’m wrong.
Really, I can't. What's he done to make you think that. 

UTJ is a massive cսnt 
Up Th Junction is a massive cսnt??  Well, he'd fit right in on here then, wouldn't he?
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

Mad Ferret" wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 12:20 Can see stubbo becoming a bit like Up the Junction on Kumb…

Hope I’m wrong.
What would "becoming like UTJ" look like? 

Currently just trying to get the thing working, answering questions about decisions taken, and trying to make it a good experience for as many people as possible.

I'm like the 'tech guy' in all this.  No desire to become invovled in the forum politics, content moderation etc.   There's established guys for all of that.  Just wanted the thing to live on.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post fraser »

Mad Ferret" wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 12:20 Can see stubbo becoming a bit like Up the Junction on Kumb…

Hope I’m wrong.
Really, I can't. What's he done to make you think that. 

UTJ is a massive cսnt 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Mad Ferret »

Can see stubbo becoming a bit like Up the Junction on Kumb…

Hope I’m wrong.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post fraser »

Some proper miserable cunts on here, a great job has been done migrating the site. But of course it's going to be different from the old site and have different features... 

 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post stubbo-admin »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 10 Sep 2024, 08:19 I notice the 'football' and 'non-football' sub-forums have been done away with. Any particular reason for that?
Because there isn't a good way with the technology of then having them all show in a single list (whilst still having their own lists separately).  So the choice was between fragmenting the forum (and you have to navigate to different section to check for new content, post in the right place, etc), or having it all one place.

We went with the latter as it keeps us all aware of it all, and also reduces the moderator overhead of having to direct posters and move posts to the 'right' place all the time.
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 426
Has liked: 254 times
Been liked: 102 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post One Sunny Day »

It runs smoothly and doesn't take an age to load, you can quote other posters, have an avatar and post pictures. Nice to see WHO has finally joined the 21st century.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3085
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Lee Trundle »

I guess RyujiSaeki takes the award for the first user to be banned?
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1694
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Sydney_Iron »

Getting used to it, but as Vinny said at the end of Snatch "its been emotional" Or was it lock stock?

What's with the like and been liked thing? WTF, And how many times you have "been liked " or "has liked" what others have posted! Can we have a "DONT LIKE" or a cսnt off as well please.............🤣

Seriously though, who gives fuck about being liked or not? this is WHO FFS.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post Come On You Irons »

I notice the 'football' and 'non-football' sub-forums have been done away with. Any particular reason for that?
User avatar
wils
Posts: 843
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 242 times

Re: New WHO | Site Feedback

Post wils »

- WIPE KNOB ON SCREEN - if something isn't working, and is technology related. Usually resolves...otherwise turn it off and on.
And it all that fails. Try following the above using the COMMAND button instead of CTRL as you're probably using a Mac. :)
Post Reply