Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Paqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
LeroysBoots
Posts: 435
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

Paqueta Paqueta

Post LeroysBoots »

"85 million !?! Lol, if we get that I'd piss myself Bloke was fucking terrible today, showboating twat"
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Hammer and Pickle »

It’s interesting it’s always the same emotionally retarded type that wants him benched for the same reactive reasons. Think it’s more their way of making some kind of contact with each other rather than anything to do with what is actually happening on the field of play. 
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Mex Martillo »

Has 2 goals and 1 assist.
I like watching skilful players.
I'd also say looking at our squad is there better to replace Paqueta in his present form? I think only Bowen is doing better.
It is truely sad what Lopetegui is getting from our recognised tallent.
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: Paqueta

Post only1billybonds »

He hasn't really created much seeing as he's supposed to be our most creative player. Don't know what his problem is but he hardly merits a place in the team, bench warmer at best ATM.
Hope he turns some sort of corner soon.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Manuel »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 10:55 He was excellent for us towards the end of his first season, so much so that even COYI came on to post he was wrong about him.. 

He started last season on fire he had the best stats for any midfielder in the top 5 leagues in Europe, in fact he was so shit City were gonna buy him for £85 million.. Since then he has fallen off a cliff. 

So he was in his best form for us when the accusations went against him. 

But he's still involved in a large percentage of our goals. I thought he'd improved at home to Everton where he created three good chances and was Motm against Newcastle where he had most passes, most tackles won and created the most chances... I was hoping he'd finally turned a corner.. Wont judge him against Arsenal because the whole team were shit. 

 
STILL refusing to criticize him despite doing fuck all for a year and costing us numerous goals with his appalling ''passing''. Some of you cult followers are just bizarre and wouldn't change your mind even if he scored a hattrick of own goals against Spurs. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Massive Attack »

I think he underestimated the seriousness of it all from the beginning and thought it would soon blow over. Longer it's gone on though, the severity then dawned on him and struggled to shake it off ever since. 
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Motivation is definitely an issue though I don’t think its lack stems so much from the failed move to Man City as having to play for managers who can’t use him properly.
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Mex Martillo »

I think at first the accusations and interest from M City motivated Paqueta, but as it has dragged on and limited his career he has lost form. I hope he sues the cunts behind it all.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: Paqueta

Post fraser »

He was excellent for us towards the end of his first season, so much so that even COYI came on to post he was wrong about him.. 

He started last season on fire he had the best stats for any midfielder in the top 5 leagues in Europe, in fact he was so shit City were gonna buy him for £85 million.. Since then he has fallen off a cliff. 

So he was in his best form for us when the accusations went against him. 

But he's still involved in a large percentage of our goals. I thought he'd improved at home to Everton where he created three good chances and was Motm against Newcastle where he had most passes, most tackles won and created the most chances... I was hoping he'd finally turned a corner.. Wont judge him against Arsenal because the whole team were shit. 
 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Manuel wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:53
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:44 It really coincided with the ALLEGED betting scam malarkey he absolutely never had a part to play in....

Before then he was quality for us most games, helping us to win a pot. He was key to all that.

Sadly now hes gone to rat shit since the FA have been on his case. Such a West Ham thing to happen when we finally get nice things to enjoy..
Utter fucking nonsense. Stop making excuses for him, this cult following he has is just fucking weird off the back a few half decent games way back. He went to shit way before this charge, and why would you not be able to pass a ball to a team mate because of it? Never heard such bollocks in all my time. The reality is he's only ever had about max 10 good games for us and when he finally goes he will quickly be forgotten about.
 
 
5 goals, 7 assists as well as contributed a lot towards us winning a Cup and generally entertained a lot of the time too in his debut season before the scandal broke. I can think of a lot worse debut seasons for us. But since the scandal broke, nothing at all seems to come off for him anymore. He's never been perfect but when he's fully focused and on form, he is a joy to watch and can cause Teams a lot of problems. I doubt we'll ever see that again though.
kinglewy
Posts: 17
Location: South Devon
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Paqueta

Post kinglewy »

I would drop him and play Kudus central with Summerville wide left.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Paqueta

Post goose »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:57 Many named him MoTM for our last win. Now I know that it’s a bit of a stretch for some but it was only three games back.
One performance in 15 games by our record signing?fucking hell you’re desperate.

Who named him man of the match btw?
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Many named him MoTM for our last win. Now I know that it’s a bit of a stretch for some but it was only three games back.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Manuel »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:44 It really coincided with the ALLEGED betting scam malarkey he absolutely never had a part to play in....

Before then he was quality for us most games, helping us to win a pot. He was key to all that.

Sadly now hes gone to rat shit since the FA have been on his case. Such a West Ham thing to happen when we finally get nice things to enjoy..
Utter fucking nonsense. Stop making excuses for him, this cult following he has is just fucking weird off the back a few half decent games way back. He went to shit way before this charge, and why would you not be able to pass a ball to a team mate because of it? Never heard such bollocks in all my time. The reality is he's only ever had about max 10 good games for us and when he finally goes he will quickly be forgotten about.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Massive Attack »

It really coincided with the ALLEGED betting scam malarkey he absolutely never had a part to play in....

Before then he was quality for us most games, helping us to win a pot. He was key to all that.

Sadly now hes gone to rat shit since the FA have been on his case. Such a West Ham thing to happen when we finally get nice things to enjoy..
dealcanvey
Posts: 343
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 36 times

Re: Paqueta

Post dealcanvey »

All going a bit like Anderson.

Brazilian signed for big money. Sets the world alight and then turns bang average. 

Really would not care if he went elsewhere in Jan as he is way off it.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Massive Attack »

goose wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:31
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:24
Rossal wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 08:14 'And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.'

Bit like Paqueta with his 6 assists in his last 43 league games....... 0 assists in 12 this season 
Maybe you should watch what actually happens on the pitch rather than the stats when it comes to the lead-up to most of our goals this season?

That should give you a bit of much-needed clarity on Paqueta’s performance (albeit below-par).
lets see all the goals that paqueta was involved in then............... top of my head i can think of one (second goal at newcastle).
Off the top of my head Brentford for Souceks as well, but then I'm struggling to think of all these hatful of goals he has had a part to play in the build up.  
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Paqueta

Post goose »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 09:24
Rossal wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 08:14 'And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.'

Bit like Paqueta with his 6 assists in his last 43 league games....... 0 assists in 12 this season 
Maybe you should watch what actually happens on the pitch rather than the stats when it comes to the lead-up to most of our goals this season?

That should give you a bit of much-needed clarity on Paqueta’s performance (albeit below-par).
lets see all the goals that paqueta was involved in then............... top of my head i can think of one (second goal at newcastle).
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Rossal wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 08:14 'And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.'

Bit like Paqueta with his 6 assists in his last 43 league games....... 0 assists in 12 this season 
Maybe you should watch what actually happens on the pitch rather than the stats when it comes to the lead-up to most of our goals this season?

That should give you a bit of much-needed clarity on Paqueta’s performance (albeit below-par).
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Massive Attack »

I'm hoping the spell on the bench was the kick up the arse he needed. Was long overdue but glad it finally happened. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Paqueta

Post goose »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 05 Dec 2024, 08:03 I'm not sure what motivates all the hate and sniping. One thing is clear - it's not any higher-level knowledge of football or awareness like empathy. And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.
In a nutshell, his shitty performances.

You’ve got some front bitching about football knowledge btw.
Rossal
Posts: 624
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Rossal »

'And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.'

Bit like Paqueta with his 6 assists in his last 43 league games....... 0 assists in 12 this season 
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Hammer and Pickle »

I'm not sure what motivates all the hate and sniping. One thing is clear - it's not any higher-level knowledge of football or awareness like empathy. And it's totally unproductive from the point of view of West Ham's fortunes on the field of play.
Rossal
Posts: 624
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Rossal »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 02 Dec 2024, 08:42 He should have taken a booking in the Arsenal game, that way he'd have been suspended for the game he's away for.

I'm sure, for him, it wouldn't have been too difficult to take a sneaky booking,.
Ah i said to my mate 'Paqueta is flying around on a mission to get booked' 

Makes sense now, he was trying to be fair to him 
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Mex Martillo »

Thought he looked very motivated when he was subbed on in Leicester. I would definitely start him on Monday.
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Paqueta

Post Mex Martillo »

I read first he was told he could do the the questions in parliament by video link so he didn't miss the game. Then he was told he didn't have to do it if he didn't want to, so he said he didn't want to be questioned and is no longer going to be questioned.
The fucking FA is the only organisation in the world taking this seriously. No trails in Brazil. Spanish, just ignore Luis Henrique where there is apparently more evidence. It's typical British to take this nonsense seriously.
Post Reply