Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 716
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 91 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:43
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:35
Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.

As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.

By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
 
Let's take slow, so I am clear.

You know that your EES NI is not the sum total your tax burden right?  That is what you said went down 2%.

I guess what do you think EES NI means?
Its a waste of time you dont understamd any of it do you.

You thought Ers NI was a tax on the individual!!!!

You are just being pedantic my Ees NI went down by 2% points therefore my tax was reduced not overall by 2% but it still went down significantly. Or are you jow just going to pick me up on that and again change the argument.

Simple question did the taxes I pay rise last year? Answer no they went down.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:32
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:23
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:02
Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?
 
Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.

Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax 🤔 😆
I’m asking billy son, because you seem to think that a pre election sweetner (as you admitted) is somehow a reflection of the change in tax burden over the last 20 years. 

honestly, you’re so out of your depth it’s astounding to read.
 
 
And you seem to be grasping at straws because you dont get how taxes work.

Go on show me where and when any of the current or previous govts have specifically increased taxes due to Asylum seeker numbers increasing.

That budget has always been there as it covers all sorts of foreign aid and yes it goes up and down depending on the need and yes it goes up to cover asylum seekers but at no point in history has any govt raised the rate of VAT or Ees NI or Excise duty specifically to cover in incease in that part of the budget so it does not directly cost me more.

The cost of asylum seekers is so negligible compared to the overall budget that any increase or decrease in that cost wont affect the taxes the individual is asked to pay.

What dont you understand!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

“Over the past decade, the financial impact of illegal immigration on UK taxpayers has escalated significantly. In the fiscal year 2019/20, the Home Office planned to spend £430 million on asylum, border, visa, and passport operations. However, by 2023/24, actual spending had surged to approximately £4 billion, reflecting a substantial increase in costs associated with managing illegal immigration and asylum seekers.”
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:35
Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.

As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.

By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
 
 
Let's take slow, so I am clear.

You know that your EES NI is not the sum total your tax burden right?  That is what you said went down 2%.

I guess what do you think EES NI means?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:35
ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:11
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:51 BillyJenningsBoots
 
Sorry, mate

Are you naive enough to believe the government honestly tells you exactly what they are doing with your money?  It's political suicide. If you believe it has and will never abuse surveilence power...I guess you might be. 

But just in this specific area - your taxes have risen to pay for the increased cost of the NHS, you said asylum seekers add to the cost of the NHS.  You therefore are paying more taxes because of it - by your statements. 


Please fill yer boots arguing that the UK should be paying more to support asylum seekers because...its the right thing to do. Its a postion.  But please don't pretend there isn't a cost and that the cost is not carried by the taxpayer. 

Have a good Sunday. 
 
Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.

As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.

By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
 
 
So in 10 years the tax burden has gone up for everyone except you? 😂 

in the meantime the uk population has grown by 4.2m people. Absolutely no link between the two facts.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:27
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:54
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
Wait one second.

Surely you don't think that that your ERS NI is the only indication of the tax you pay?
Ffs Ers NI is paid by the Employer not me... the argument is about ME paying more personally out of my pay packet or VAT, excise duty etc. Prove that any of those have been increased over the last 10 years to specifically cover an increase in the numbers Asylum seekers.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:11
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:51 BillyJenningsBoots
 
Sorry, mate

Are you naive enough to believe the government honestly tells you exactly what they are doing with your money?  It's political suicide. If you believe it has and will never abuse surveilence power...I guess you might be. 

But just in this specific area - your taxes have risen to pay for the increased cost of the NHS, you said asylum seekers add to the cost of the NHS.  You therefore are paying more taxes because of it - by your statements. 


Please fill yer boots arguing that the UK should be paying more to support asylum seekers because...its the right thing to do. Its a postion.  But please don't pretend there isn't a cost and that the cost is not carried by the taxpayer. 

Have a good Sunday. 
 
 
Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.

As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.

By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:23
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:02
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:54
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?
 
Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.

Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax 🤔 😆
I’m asking billy son, because you seem to think that a pre election sweetner (as you admitted) is somehow a reflection of the change in tax burden over the last 20 years. 

honestly, you’re so out of your depth it’s astounding to read.
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:54
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
Wait one second.

Surely you don't think that that your ERS NI is the only indication of the tax you pay?
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 21:02
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:54
ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:40
"Not all" = some are. Correct?

So you your self have established that there is a cost to the NHS from asylum seekers. 

You pay for that.  Case closed.
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?
 
 
Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.

Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax 🤔 😆
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:51
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:59
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:50
No I havent I do not pay more tax because of asylum seekers. When did the govt increases taxes specifically to cover asylum costs? Answer : they didnt.

Youve changed your question to has it impacted how its distributed. Answer : yes by something like 0.1 of 1%.

You think asylum seekers are responsible for the £9bn increase in NHS costs do you?
Of course you pay more tax. You’ve been shown how the tax burden has risen with inflation, you’ve also got the chancellor outlining the pressures it causes on tax revenue.

nobody said £9bn is solely down to immigration, but it’s a simple fact that more people = more higher cost of running the NHS.
 
What are you not getting I do not pay more tax and neither do you.

So costs rise, the Chancellor wants more funds to pay for everything what did she do - she increased Employers NI. Did that increase my tax - no! Did she say due to the increased costs of Asylum seekers we are increasing Ers NI or was it due to the rising costs of the NHS, Education etc and the overall budget defecit left by the previous govt? Yes she did say that.

Oh and that tax budget includes Asylum seeker costs which is less that 0.3% of the total. So is materially negligible and was not the reason Ers NI was increased. 

In fact inspite of the rising costs of the NHS and Education etc to this country my tax has fallen in the last 12 months as the prev govt reduced Ees NI by 2%age points as an election sweetener. Sorry forgot about that FACT!
The last 12 months?? Hahaha come on billy you cannot be this dumb. How about over the past 12 years? Or did the population growth only happen in 1 year?

lol “my NI went down therefore I’m exempt from funding anything to do with illegal immigration”
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:51 BillyJenningsBoots
 
 
Sorry, mate

Are you naive enough to believe the government honestly tells you exactly what they are doing with your money?  It's political suicide. If you believe it has and will never abuse surveilence power...I guess you might be. 

But just in this specific area - your taxes have risen to pay for the increased cost of the NHS, you said asylum seekers add to the cost of the NHS.  You therefore are paying more taxes because of it - by your statements. 


Please fill yer boots arguing that the UK should be paying more to support asylum seekers because...its the right thing to do. Its a postion.  But please don't pretend there isn't a cost and that the cost is not carried by the taxpayer. 

Have a good Sunday. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:54
ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:40
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:28

 
"Not all" = some are. Correct?

So you your self have established that there is a cost to the NHS from asylum seekers. 

You pay for that.  Case closed.
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:40
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:28

They are not all asylum seekers and not all asylum seekers are claiming dole either its housing them and keeping them that costs.
 
"Not all" = some are. Correct?

So you your self have established that there is a cost to the NHS from asylum seekers. 

You pay for that.  Case closed.
Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.

Case closed!
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:59
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:50
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:29
1) billy you’ve just pointed out that illegal immigration does impact you and the tax you pay.
2) any guesses what impact a growing population has on the NHS.
No I havent I do not pay more tax because of asylum seekers. When did the govt increases taxes specifically to cover asylum costs? Answer : they didnt.

Youve changed your question to has it impacted how its distributed. Answer : yes by something like 0.1 of 1%.

You think asylum seekers are responsible for the £9bn increase in NHS costs do you?
Of course you pay more tax. You’ve been shown how the tax burden has risen with inflation, you’ve also got the chancellor outlining the pressures it causes on tax revenue.

nobody said £9bn is solely down to immigration, but it’s a simple fact that more people = more higher cost of running the NHS.
 
 
What are you not getting I do not pay more tax and neither do you.

So costs rise, the Chancellor wants more funds to pay for everything what did she do - she increased Employers NI. Did that increase my tax - no! Did she say due to the increased costs of Asylum seekers we are increasing Ers NI or was it due to the rising costs of the NHS, Education etc and the overall budget defecit left by the previous govt? Yes she did say that.

Oh and that tax budget includes Asylum seeker costs which is less that 0.3% of the total. So is materially negligible and was not the reason Ers NI was increased. 

In fact inspite of the rising costs of the NHS and Education etc to this country my tax has fallen in the last 12 months as the prev govt reduced Ees NI by 2%age points as an election sweetener. Sorry forgot about that FACT!
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 20:28

They are not all asylum seekers and not all asylum seekers are claiming dole either its housing them and keeping them that costs.
"Not all" = some are. Correct?

So you your self have established that there is a cost to the NHS from asylum seekers. 

You pay for that.  Case closed.






User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:55
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:23
I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?
 
I was first permanently in the UK as a student (before my family stuff came through), I paid a fee every year to access the NHS.  I also had to guarantee funding (scholarships primarly but beyond that I had to literally get a bank statement from my mother and have her sign a legal statement that she would support me in an emergency) so I would not access other government services - essentially the dole. 

The fees I paid decreased the need for your taxes to fund the NHS, assuming you were paying taxes then.  

Do you believe all people entering the UK now support your governement with similar fees?

If not you government has to look elsewhere, like your taxes or borrowing (the interest increases your taxes) or printing money (inflation - your money buys less).
Well done you! The 100s of thousands of migrants that come in on workers and student visa pay tax and also contribute positively to this country.

They are not all asylum seekers and not all asylum seekers are claiming dole either its housing them and keeping them that costs.

So not sure what your point is!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

*immigration not inflation 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:50
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:29
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:23
My tax rate has not changed because of Asylum costs and neither has the amount of tax I pay.

Whether that is PAYE,VAT fuel duty or the price of pint its all tax and it has not increased directly because of asylum seekers.

You really think that asylum costs are a major factor of pressure on this or previous govts to increase taxes it amounts to less than half a percent of the total budget. I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?

BTW the net migration figures show that asylum seekers are a small percentage of the overall net migration numbers that are mostly workers via visas and students. The largest number in recent years were from India and not Palestine or Syria.
1) billy you’ve just pointed out that illegal immigration does impact you and the tax you pay.
2) any guesses what impact a growing population has on the NHS.
No I havent I do not pay more tax because of asylum seekers. When did the govt increases taxes specifically to cover asylum costs? Answer : they didnt.

Youve changed your question to has it impacted how its distributed. Answer : yes by something like 0.1 of 1%.

You think asylum seekers are responsible for the £9bn increase in NHS costs do you?
Of course you pay more tax. You’ve been shown how the tax burden has risen with inflation, you’ve also got the chancellor outlining the pressures it causes on tax revenue.

nobody said £9bn is solely down to immigration, but it’s a simple fact that more people = more higher cost of running the NHS.
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:23
I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?
 
 
I was first permanently in the UK as a student (before my family stuff came through), I paid a fee every year to access the NHS.  I also had to guarantee funding (scholarships primarly but beyond that I had to literally get a bank statement from my mother and have her sign a legal statement that she would support me in an emergency) so I would not access other government services - essentially the dole. 

The fees I paid decreased the need for your taxes to fund the NHS, assuming you were paying taxes then.  

Do you believe all people entering the UK now support your governement with similar fees?

If not you government has to look elsewhere, like your taxes or borrowing (the interest increases your taxes) or printing money (inflation - your money buys less).
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:29
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:23
ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:48
 
Let's naively pretend that tax is the only way you pay for government spending, for the sake of simplicity...

...so your tax rate has not increased at any level - ever. 

Be honest. 
My tax rate has not changed because of Asylum costs and neither has the amount of tax I pay.

Whether that is PAYE,VAT fuel duty or the price of pint its all tax and it has not increased directly because of asylum seekers.

You really think that asylum costs are a major factor of pressure on this or previous govts to increase taxes it amounts to less than half a percent of the total budget. I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?

BTW the net migration figures show that asylum seekers are a small percentage of the overall net migration numbers that are mostly workers via visas and students. The largest number in recent years were from India and not Palestine or Syria.
1) billy you’ve just pointed out that illegal immigration does impact you and the tax you pay.
2) any guesses what impact a growing population has on the NHS.
No I havent I do not pay more tax because of asylum seekers. When did the govt increases taxes specifically to cover asylum costs? Answer : they didnt.

Youve changed your question to has it impacted how its distributed. Answer : yes by something like 0.1 of 1%.

You think asylum seekers are responsible for the £9bn increase in NHS costs do you?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 19:23
ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:48
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:42
No I dont pay more tax... you clearly dont know unserstand how the tax system works. My same tax will be distributed differently maybe but I wont pay more because of it!
 
Let's naively pretend that tax is the only way you pay for government spending, for the sake of simplicity...

...so your tax rate has not increased at any level - ever. 

Be honest. 
My tax rate has not changed because of Asylum costs and neither has the amount of tax I pay.

Whether that is PAYE,VAT fuel duty or the price of pint its all tax and it has not increased directly because of asylum seekers.

You really think that asylum costs are a major factor of pressure on this or previous govts to increase taxes it amounts to less than half a percent of the total budget. I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?

BTW the net migration figures show that asylum seekers are a small percentage of the overall net migration numbers that are mostly workers via visas and students. The largest number in recent years were from India and not Palestine or Syria.
1) billy you’ve just pointed out that illegal immigration does impact you and the tax you pay.
2) any guesses what impact a growing population has on the NHS.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

ironsofcanada wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:48
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:42
No I dont pay more tax... you clearly dont know unserstand how the tax system works. My same tax will be distributed differently maybe but I wont pay more because of it!
 
Let's naively pretend that tax is the only way you pay for government spending, for the sake of simplicity...

...so your tax rate has not increased at any level - ever. 

Be honest. 
My tax rate has not changed because of Asylum costs and neither has the amount of tax I pay.

Whether that is PAYE,VAT fuel duty or the price of pint its all tax and it has not increased directly because of asylum seekers.

You really think that asylum costs are a major factor of pressure on this or previous govts to increase taxes it amounts to less than half a percent of the total budget. I think the increase in NHS costs are a bigger impact on UK tax dont you?

BTW the net migration figures show that asylum seekers are a small percentage of the overall net migration numbers that are mostly workers via visas and students. The largest number in recent years were from India and not Palestine or Syria.
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:42
No I dont pay more tax... you clearly dont know unserstand how the tax system works. My same tax will be distributed differently maybe but I wont pay more because of it!
 
 
Let's naively pretend that tax is the only way you pay for government spending, for the sake of simplicity...

...so your tax rate has not increased at any level - ever. 

Be honest. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:42
goose wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:23
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 23 Feb 2025, 18:20
I dont pay any additional tax specifically to cover for undocumented immgrants especially as they cant claim benefits and only the cost of housing them maybe a consideration, as I say it really has no direct impact on me
You’ve just pointed out that it does impact you. 
You absolutely do pay additional tax because of it.
No I dont pay more tax... you clearly dont know unserstand how the tax system works. My same tax will be distributed differently maybe but I wont pay more because of it!
Last ten years the tax burden of uk tax payers has gone up from 32% of GDP to 37% of GDP.

Unless you have a magic tax code, you do pay more tax.

Even if you didn’t (you do), the distribution of tax revenue still has a direct impact on your life.
Last edited by goose on 23 Feb 2025, 18:50, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply