AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Potter Out
-
- Posts: 808
- Been liked: 193 times
Potter Out
Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
-
- Posts: 808
- Been liked: 193 times
Re: POTTER OUT
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
You nailed it.
Sadly the financials mean dismissal without a break clause is a non-starter.
The only other hope is the arrogant flake's ego can't handle the criticism his gutless, insipid football deserves, he mentally implodes and walks.
Meanwhile Spurs beat us to Iraola and Brady fellates Dyche and Ange.
Sadly the financials mean dismissal without a break clause is a non-starter.
The only other hope is the arrogant flake's ego can't handle the criticism his gutless, insipid football deserves, he mentally implodes and walks.
Meanwhile Spurs beat us to Iraola and Brady fellates Dyche and Ange.
Re: POTTER OUT
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Agree with that, ironically for about a season each we played some of our most exciting football in my living memory under Moyes and Allardyce, trouble is it was one track and once teams learn and prep for it it becomes some of the worst to endure watching
-
- Posts: 357
- Has liked: 40 times
- Been liked: 148 times
Re: POTTER OUT
If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Re: POTTER OUT
Way too kneejerky, this isn't his team yet and the vitriolic tantrums should be saved for a couple of out "star" players
Half the problem is the team have absolutely nothing to play for apart from pride and not enough of them are concerned about that anyway
Half the problem is the team have absolutely nothing to play for apart from pride and not enough of them are concerned about that anyway
-
- Posts: 110
- Old WHO Number: 226870
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
Re: POTTER OUT
He’s not gonna get sacked, but I’m far from impressed by what I’ve seen.
We’re more solid defensively but that seems to have been achieved by just getting more bodies behind the ball. We do not have a clue how to attack teams. The players we have are not THAT bad, a decent coach should be able to get some kind of performance out of them.
I don’t think I’ve seen us put a performance together since Newcastle away.
As a club we’re fast approaching a season and a half of utter dog shit.
We’re more solid defensively but that seems to have been achieved by just getting more bodies behind the ball. We do not have a clue how to attack teams. The players we have are not THAT bad, a decent coach should be able to get some kind of performance out of them.
I don’t think I’ve seen us put a performance together since Newcastle away.
As a club we’re fast approaching a season and a half of utter dog shit.
Re: POTTER OUT
Chip Shop Charlie" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 00:10 And who's to say that Potter wants to stay after the end of the season?
i didnt want to say anything but he has seemed less interested the last couple of games.
Maybe he's seen enough and just more concerned with who he is bringing in next season . .
Maybe he's seen enough and just more concerned with who he is bringing in next season . .
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: POTTER OUT
It was poor defending by Sullivan for the Wolves goal, so let's not put this shit all on Potter.
I couldn't give one fuck if he stays or goes, the reality is it's game over for us and has been for a while. Close the club down.
I couldn't give one fuck if he stays or goes, the reality is it's game over for us and has been for a while. Close the club down.
-
- Posts: 1872
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 164 times
- Been liked: 339 times
-
- Posts: 248
- Has liked: 318 times
- Been liked: 92 times
Re: POTTER OUT
The issues run way deeper than potter . Namely the two foot russian hat wearing parasite .
-
- Posts: 112
- Location: Spain / Sweden
- Old WHO Number: 256863
- Has liked: 203 times
- Been liked: 22 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3224
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 723 times
- Been liked: 1085 times
Re: POTTER OUT
we're fucked as long as the 4ft prick is selecting the manager, so I don't see any point changing again. survival is the only priority for the cսnt
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4571
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 30 times
- Been liked: 542 times
-
- Posts: 2163
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 79 times
- Been liked: 430 times
Re: POTTER OUT
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Apr 2025, 22:17 Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
I can’t be bothered.