AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Potter Out
-
- Posts: 527
- Been liked: 140 times
Potter Out
Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
-
- Posts: 1849
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 330 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
Nobody's having a go at you for being happy still.
-
- Posts: 401
- Has liked: 49 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players
-
- Posts: 191
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 86 times
Re: Potter Out
Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
-
- Posts: 401
- Has liked: 49 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Re: Potter Out
I’m backing this
you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza
This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal
this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club
you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza
This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal
this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club
-
- Posts: 527
- Been liked: 140 times
Re: Potter Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:13 Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward. We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
Except it's not Pep's brand the tedious cսnt has himself admitted his admiration of Roberto Martinez' possession based style.
We're totally fucked.
We're totally fucked.
Re: Potter Out
Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward. We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
-
- Posts: 401
- Has liked: 49 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Re: Potter Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 14:46 Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem. But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham. Far less tiki taka.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
Not sure how you’re seeing any comparison to us and Man City unless it’s from the 2001 season
Re: Potter Out
I’m definitely Potter in then if that no mark fat cսnt is Potter out.
it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August.
The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag.
it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August.
The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag.
Re: Potter Out
Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem. But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham. Far less tiki taka.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
- RootsRadical
- Posts: 781
- Old WHO Number: 321614
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 99 times
Re: Potter Out
I said at the time he was sacked that Loppy should have been given until the end of the season to see how it looked then.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.
I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.
I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.
-
- Posts: 527
- Been liked: 140 times
Re: POTTER OUT
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
You nailed it.
Sadly the financials mean dismissal without a break clause is a non-starter.
The only other hope is the arrogant flake's ego can't handle the criticism his gutless, insipid football deserves, he mentally implodes and walks.
Meanwhile Spurs beat us to Iraola and Brady fellates Dyche and Ange.
Sadly the financials mean dismissal without a break clause is a non-starter.
The only other hope is the arrogant flake's ego can't handle the criticism his gutless, insipid football deserves, he mentally implodes and walks.
Meanwhile Spurs beat us to Iraola and Brady fellates Dyche and Ange.
Re: POTTER OUT
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Agree with that, ironically for about a season each we played some of our most exciting football in my living memory under Moyes and Allardyce, trouble is it was one track and once teams learn and prep for it it becomes some of the worst to endure watching
-
- Posts: 166
- Has liked: 19 times
- Been liked: 89 times
Re: POTTER OUT
If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Re: Graham Potter
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54
Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere.
West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Re: POTTER OUT
Way too kneejerky, this isn't his team yet and the vitriolic tantrums should be saved for a couple of out "star" players
Half the problem is the team have absolutely nothing to play for apart from pride and not enough of them are concerned about that anyway
Half the problem is the team have absolutely nothing to play for apart from pride and not enough of them are concerned about that anyway
-
- Posts: 108
- Old WHO Number: 226870
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
Re: POTTER OUT
He’s not gonna get sacked, but I’m far from impressed by what I’ve seen.
We’re more solid defensively but that seems to have been achieved by just getting more bodies behind the ball. We do not have a clue how to attack teams. The players we have are not THAT bad, a decent coach should be able to get some kind of performance out of them.
I don’t think I’ve seen us put a performance together since Newcastle away.
As a club we’re fast approaching a season and a half of utter dog shit.
We’re more solid defensively but that seems to have been achieved by just getting more bodies behind the ball. We do not have a clue how to attack teams. The players we have are not THAT bad, a decent coach should be able to get some kind of performance out of them.
I don’t think I’ve seen us put a performance together since Newcastle away.
As a club we’re fast approaching a season and a half of utter dog shit.
Re: POTTER OUT
Chip Shop Charlie" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 00:10 And who's to say that Potter wants to stay after the end of the season?
i didnt want to say anything but he has seemed less interested the last couple of games.
Maybe he's seen enough and just more concerned with who he is bringing in next season . .
Maybe he's seen enough and just more concerned with who he is bringing in next season . .
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: POTTER OUT
It was poor defending by Sullivan for the Wolves goal, so let's not put this shit all on Potter.
I couldn't give one fuck if he stays or goes, the reality is it's game over for us and has been for a while. Close the club down.
I couldn't give one fuck if he stays or goes, the reality is it's game over for us and has been for a while. Close the club down.
-
- Posts: 1694
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
-
- Posts: 193
- Has liked: 233 times
- Been liked: 69 times
Re: POTTER OUT
The issues run way deeper than potter . Namely the two foot russian hat wearing parasite .
-
- Posts: 103
- Location: Spain / Sweden
- Old WHO Number: 256863
- Has liked: 176 times
- Been liked: 18 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3035
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: POTTER OUT
we're fucked as long as the 4ft prick is selecting the manager, so I don't see any point changing again. survival is the only priority for the cսnt