Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Potter Out

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 527
Been liked: 140 times

Potter Potter Out

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.  

11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.

Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Potter Out

Post twoleftfeet »

Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
 

The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Manuel »

Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
Nobody's having a go at you for being happy still. 
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Maverick180180 »

Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players 
Dick Shaftsbury
Posts: 191
Old WHO Number: 319145
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 86 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Dick Shaftsbury »

Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Maverick180180 »

I’m backing this 

you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza

This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal 

this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 527
Been liked: 140 times

Re: Potter Out

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Sir Alf" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:13 Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward.  We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
Except it's not Pep's brand the tedious cսnt has himself admitted his admiration of Roberto Martinez' possession based style.

We're totally fucked.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Sir Alf »

Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward.  We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Maverick180180 »

Sir Alf" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 14:46 Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem.  But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham.  Far less tiki taka.  

I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.  
 
 
Not sure how you’re seeing any comparison to us and Man City unless it’s from the 2001 season 
Pub Bigot
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 486 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Pub Bigot »

Manuel wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 14:31 Nick on C&B has officially gone Potter out :-)
 
 
I’m definitely Potter in then if that no mark fat cսnt is Potter out. 

it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August. 

The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag. 
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Sir Alf »

Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem.  But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham.  Far less tiki taka.  

I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.  
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Manuel »

Nick on C&B has officially gone Potter out :-)
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 781
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 99 times

Re: Potter Out

Post RootsRadical »

I said at the time he was sacked that Loppy should have been given until the end of the season to see how it looked then.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.

I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.



 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 527
Been liked: 140 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.

Re: Graham Potter

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54

Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere. 

West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
You nailed it.

Sadly the financials mean dismissal without a break clause is a non-starter.

The only other hope is the arrogant flake's ego can't handle the criticism his gutless, insipid football deserves, he mentally implodes and walks.

Meanwhile Spurs beat us to Iraola and Brady fellates Dyche and Ange.
Mr Anon
Posts: 575
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 130 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Mr Anon »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 08:18 If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.

Re: Graham Potter

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54

Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere. 

West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Agree with that, ironically for about a season each we played some of our most exciting football in my living memory under Moyes and Allardyce, trouble is it was one track and once teams learn and prep for it it becomes some of the worst to endure watching 
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 166
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 89 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

If we somehow get to have a decent transfer window next summer then no doubt results will improve. But wouldn't they under any manager? With "his team" in place the style of football won't change from what we see now because this is how he always has his teams play. I wrote the below on the day he was appointed, so it was clearly predictable from the start how he would set the team up and how most of our fans would respond to it.

Re: Graham Potter

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard » 09 Jan 2025, 06:54

Hope I'm wrong but I'm not expecting to be blown away by the style of football. Expect it will be much like Pellegrini's and Lopetegui's, focusing on keeping possession and slowly recycling the ball, hoping for an opening. Meanwhile the opposition defence has had time to park the bus and the attack ends with a desperate attempt from distance or a cross going nowhere. 

West Ham fans say they like possession based football, playing out from the back, etc. but really most like a more direct style of play, not dithering about but getting the ball quickly into the final third, like we often saw under Redknapp, Pardew and Bilic.
Mr Anon
Posts: 575
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 130 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Mr Anon »

Way too kneejerky, this isn't his team yet and the vitriolic tantrums should be saved for a couple of out "star" players 

Half the problem is the team have absolutely nothing to play for apart from pride and not enough of them are concerned about that anyway 
SnarestoneIron
Posts: 108
Old WHO Number: 226870
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post SnarestoneIron »

I didn't see the 4ft russian dwarf on the pitch!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post goose »

He’s not gonna get sacked, but I’m far from impressed by what I’ve seen.

We’re more solid defensively but that seems to have been achieved by just getting more bodies behind the ball. We do not have a clue how to attack teams. The players we have are not THAT bad, a decent coach should be able to get some kind of performance out of them.

I don’t think I’ve seen us put a performance together since Newcastle away.

As a club we’re fast approaching a season and a half of utter dog shit.
honky cat
Posts: 509
Has liked: 297 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post honky cat »

Chip Shop Charlie" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 00:10 And who's to say that Potter wants to stay after the end of the season?
i didnt want to say anything but he has seemed less interested the last couple of games.
Maybe he's seen enough and just more concerned with who he is bringing in next season . . 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Manuel »

It was poor defending by Sullivan for the Wolves goal, so let's not put this shit all on Potter.

I couldn't give one fuck if he stays or goes, the reality is it's game over for us and has been for a while. Close the club down.
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1694
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Sydney_Iron »

Pshyco scored all 4
Posts: 193
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Pshyco scored all 4 »

The issues run way deeper than potter . Namely the two foot russian hat wearing parasite .
Chip Shop Charlie
Posts: 103
Location: Spain / Sweden
Old WHO Number: 256863
Has liked: 176 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Chip Shop Charlie »

And who's to say that Potter wants to stay after the end of the season?
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3034
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 641 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post Takashi Miike »

we're fucked as long as the 4ft prick is selecting the manager, so I don't see any point changing again. survival is the only priority for the cսnt
honky cat
Posts: 509
Has liked: 297 times
Been liked: 181 times

Re: POTTER OUT

Post honky cat »

AVRAM IN
Post Reply