Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
charleyfarley
Posts: 546
Old WHO Number: 13854
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 11 times

‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread

Post charleyfarley »

". ........... V St James‚Äô Park 30th Mar 12:30 GMT VAR David Coote Rob Jones: (17) - 79 4 D??bravka, Livramento, Lascelles ¬©, Sch?§r, Burn, Longstaff, Guimar?£es, Willock, Murphy, Gordon, Isak Subs: Karius (GK), Dummett, Hall, Ritchie, Krafth, Anderson, Almir??n, Barnes, White Areola, Coufal, Mavropanos, Zouma ¬©, Emerson, Ward-Prowse, Souƒçek, Paquet?°, Kudus, Bowen, Antonio Subs: Fabia?Ñski (GK), Johnson, Cresswell, Ogbonna, Phillips, Earthy, Cornet, Ings, Mubama Newcastle 7/8: Draw 14/5: West Ham 5/2 discovery +/TNT Sports 1/TNT Sports Ultimate ."
Headtheball
Posts: 72
Old WHO Number: 214582
Been liked: 2 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Headtheball »

Today's result and the manner of the defeat has knocked the stuffing out of me. Really feel low. We were 3-1 up and always a threat on the break. Should have been a straight swap in midfield or bring Ings on for Antonio. The penalty decision was atrocious and changed the game. I do wonder if there is a deliberate attempt to stop us getting close to the top six as we have had some awful VAR and referee decisions go against in this period over the last few years.
zico
Posts: 4072
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 259 times
Been liked: 165 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post zico »

I don't mind protecting a lead when you are 3-1 up away from home but there seems to be this myth especially amongst Moyes supporters in the media that he is a defensively organised and solid manager and yet we have the only minus goal difference in the Top 9 and oddly enough have also scored the second least amount of goals in the Top 9. Out of the Top 9 only the bottom three have conceded more than us.
Exiled In Surrey
Posts: 21
Old WHO Number: 33133

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Exiled In Surrey »

Get the attacking winning joke of a manager out now.
marty feldman
Posts: 236
Old WHO Number: 254112

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post marty feldman »

Theres no doubting Moyes fucked up . That's his forte . But the Geordies 2nd penalty was absolutely scandalous. As bad a decision as I've ever seen watching football in 40 odd years. And yes I've us giving dodgy decisions as well. But that was beyond the pale .
jfk
Posts: 260
Old WHO Number: 225167

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post jfk »

"I don’t care what the refs decision are,always seem To be on the wrong end of things.much more importantly once again Moyes tactics were wrong,after the second goal went in we should have taken full advantage of a team dropping like flies that ain’t all that. Take the fuckers to the cleaners it was easy to see our attack was troubling them. To sit back and lose is one I’ll remember. We all know what we’re capable of with Paqueta ,kudus,Bowen and eager fit Antonio. Moyes chooses once again not to go for the jugular after a team almost playing a second 11. This fucking wanker needs to go,perhaps if any pundits watched todays game these’d understand why most of us detest the fucking bloke."
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1445
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Mex Martillo »

"I now understand why Newcastle have so many injuries. Bunch of porcelain dolls, slightest touch or even no touch at all, like Paqueta kicking the ball at one to get a corner and they are all down broken. Really pathetic. Fucking cheats, especially that Gordon wanker. Has to be said though, it was the Moyesias negative subs to defend 1-3 that lost us the game. Getting very tiring."
Hammer-ed
Posts: 23

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Hammer-ed »

"Massive Attack mentioned that too at 7:37 Sat Mar 30. Many Sane minded people would placed Cornet or Ings in the forward position rather then putting Kelvin Philipps in the midfield and have Lucas Paquet?° .up front. Thus Moyles fucked up the ""balance of the team"" but by thinking defensively we lost yet again We had the winning formula when we were 3-1 up bur Moyles fuck it up yet again."
gph
Posts: 359
Old WHO Number: 10584
Been liked: 1 time

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post gph »

"The Newcastle fans who were quite happy to see Paqueta's making a mountain out of a molehill being ignored by the ref, think that Kudus' goal shouldn't have stood because their player was ignored while doing exactly the same thing? Who do they think they are, ManU?"
zico
Posts: 4072
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 259 times
Been liked: 165 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post zico »

"Can't believe the Toon fans on social media claim Kudus goal should ever have stood because of a ""head injury"". This I think was the same big defender who shoulder barged Kudus when he was clean through with no attempt to play the ball. They have to find a way to stop this cheating, when someone just brushes your nose with a finger, and I include the likes of Paqueta in that. It's embarrassing."
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3357
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Massive Attack »

"Oneside: ""and would have realised that attack was very much the best form of defence"" Oh no Oneside, only a thick idiot would think that......you're absolutely correct by the way."
User avatar
factory seconds
Posts: 164
Old WHO Number: 294848
Been liked: 64 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post factory seconds »

Maybe to counter the chance of a bent official giving a pen away we might contrive to have the ball somewhere other than at the feet of the opposition in our own box.
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post onsideman »

"Moyes makes the same subs at more or less the same time, every game. He would try to defend the change as a way of tightening things up or bolstering the midfield, but anyone watching the fucking game would have seen how disjointed and disorganised Newcastle were at the back and would have realised that attack was very much the best form of defence. We looked dangerous going forward all game but calamitous in defence... and we just forgot to go forward"
Eastside surge
Posts: 106
Old WHO Number: 213924
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Eastside surge »

"Just watched the highlights, and just confirming what I already knew but the game is simply riddled with cheating players and every team has them. But now added with cheating overseers watching on from afar. Glad I attended matches when I did from the late seventies as I simply couldn't stomach watching what modern football has now become."
Eastside surge
Posts: 106
Old WHO Number: 213924
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Eastside surge »

"Just watched the highlights, and just confirming what I already knew but the game is simply riddled with cheating players and every team has them. But now added with cheating overseers watching on from afar. Glad I attended matches when I did from the late seventies as I simply couldn't stomach watching what modern football has now become."
Gaffer58
Posts: 238
Old WHO Number: 292526
Been liked: 31 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Gaffer58 »

"Dean Ashton on Talksport said our average possession for the season is 40%, that basically means we will spend more time defending then attacking, but as our defence is slow and crap and our goal difference is the worse in the top half Moyes decides to yet again “ shut up shop” and once again we concede ( 3 in this case). It’s the same mistakes time after time and the useless Jock never learns."
User avatar
chim chim cha boo
Posts: 436
Old WHO Number: 17737
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post chim chim cha boo »

"Has Calvin Philips got a football curse hanging over him? It doesn't matter how much money he makes, what the FUCK can you do if you try and put your laces through a ball coming straight for you when as you swing for it a foot appears from a player you haven't even seen because he's behind you? What was he supposed to do? The commentary didn't even mention it, an ex-pro, well, Owen Hargreaves at least says it was a penalty and those cunts at Stockley Park give it to the ref to revue? Football has become something I can't really understand anymore. It MUST be as bent as fuck, surely?"
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post onsideman »

"claypole 7:56 Sat Mar 30 He had no grounds to do so. He hadn't told our players to wait for the whistle so once the ball was static and in the correct spot he couldn't then change his mind. The ref was dire though, however it was Coote who was responsible for the 2nd penalty. Wasn't given on the field"
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Iron Duke »

The second penalty was fucking ridiculous and completely changed the outcome of the game. But…Moyes gave them the initiative by making the wrong negative bollocks substitution…again.
smartypants
Posts: 76
Old WHO Number: 292451
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post smartypants »

"What you ranting at me for, all I’ve said is the penalty shouldnt have been given and changed the result, get a fucking grip"
nychammer
Posts: 1413
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post nychammer »

"In Singapore and couldn’t get out to watch the game. THANK FUCK. Sounds like a proper case of bad luck and poor subs to match their decent ones. You really have to have a hard look at yourself when you’re 3-1.up and lose 4-3. We’d have Been level with Man U and well clear of Newcastle had we won. Very fitting that as West Ham we should somehow conspire to throw it away in our finest tradition. On the positive side of things, it goes to show just how limited we are under Moyes and that to progress we must not give him another contract"
RM10
Posts: 565
Old WHO Number: 15416
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post RM10 »

I thought they were soft pens hope we get similar to even them out eh.
Nutsin
Posts: 2239
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post Nutsin »

"Nothing to defend here, no player exhaustion issues. The substitution was purely tactical and Phillips shit the bed again. He shouldn’t see the pitch again this season unless there is an injury. Never an easy place to go and get something but being 3-1 up and losing 4-3 is shocking. Not gonna defend today’s performance from Moyes or Phillips. The refereeing and VAR is and has been corrupt for a long time. There is no way they will allow us to overtake Man U if they can help it."
daveyg
Posts: 368
Old WHO Number: 17168

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post daveyg »

Smarty Phillips coming on for Antonio was wrong. Phillips not clearing the ball first time like the player he and he Moyes thinks he is is the the issue. What don't you get. Moyes for signing him then thinking he can do a job. For the winning goal Phillips is beaten to easily. He should have come off for Ings then.
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 781
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 99 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post RootsRadical »

Anyone who still doesn't think the game is BENT hasn't seen the 2nd penalty.
claypole
Posts: 590
Old WHO Number: 240662
Has liked: 30 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: ‚ö? Newcastle v West Ham - Official Match Thread - Preview

Post claypole »

I thought the ref was poor but i thought he did well to allow our 2nd to stand another ref would have blown before the ball hit the net.
Post Reply